Content DRDO celebrates 68th Foundation Day Jan Samarth Portal DRDO celebrates 68th Foundation Day Why in News ? DRDO celebrated its 68th Foundation Day on 01 January 2026. Review of 2025 achievements & 2026 targets by Raksha Mantri and DRDO leadership. Record defence indigenisation momentum: 22 Acceptance of Necessity (AoN) approvals worth ~₹1.30 lakh crore for DRDO-developed systems to be manufactured by Indian industries — highest ever in a single year. 11 acquisition contracts worth ₹26,000 crore signed with DRDO production partners. Relevance   GS 3 — Internal Security & Defence Technology Indigenous defence R&D, strategic autonomy, Aatmanirbhar Bharat in defence Force modernisation — missiles, air defence, EW, naval systems, ISR, artillery Defence production ecosystem, DPSU–private–MSME integration Technology depth — cyber, AI, space, hypersonics, CBRN capabilities Import substitution + export orientation in defence manufacturing DRDO — Basics Founded: 1958 Headquarters: New Delhi Parent Ministry: Ministry of Defence Head: Secretary, Defence R&D & Chairman DRDO Mandate: Indigenous development of missiles, radars, EW, naval systems, aeronautics, armaments, life sciences, CBRN, AI & cyber systems. Vision: Strengthen strategic deterrence & defence self-reliance (Aatmanirbhar Bharat). Network: ~50+ laboratories, strong industry-academia ecosystem. Key Highlights of 2025 – Output & Indigenisation Push AoN approvals (~₹1.30 lakh crore) for major systems including: IADWS, Conventional Ballistic Missile System QRSAM ‘Anant Shastra’, LRASSCM IDDIS Mk-II, Astra Mk-II (BVRAAM) NAG (Tracked) Mk-2, Advanced Light Weight Torpedo PBMM-NG mines, AEW&C Mk-1A Mountain Radars, LCA Mk-1A Full Mission Simulator 11 signed contracts (~₹26,000 crore) for: Nag Missile System, Ashwini LLTR Radar ADFCR, EW Suite for Mi-17 V5 Area Denial Munition, HEPF-Pinaka Infantry Floating Foot Bridge Wargaming System ACADA, ATAGS, etc. User Evaluation Trials — Completed / Final Stage Pralay (S-to-S Missile) Akash-NG Pinaka – Guided Extended Range Advanced Light Weight Torpedo ER-ASR, MPATGM EW Systems for plains/deserts Border Surveillance System (BOSS) Software Defined Radio CBRN Water Purification System Pipeline for 2026 Induction Indian Light Tank VSHORADS, VL-SRSAM NASM-SR, Long Range LACM Rudram-2 ULPGM-V3 CL-ATGM for Arjun MBT Long-Range Glide Bomb ‘Gaurav’ Long-Range & VHF Radars High-Power Microwave Systems Microwave Obscurant Chaff Rockets OBOGS-centric ILSS (LCA) Automatic Fire Protection (Dornier-228) Strategic Significance Boost to Defence Self-Reliance Largest-ever AoN + contracting pipeline → reduces import dependence. Technology Depth Shift toward next-gen domains: cyber, space, AI, EW, hypersonics, advanced missiles. Operational Edge Enhances air defence, precision strike, naval ASW, border surveillance, artillery lethality. Industrial Multipliers Strengthens MSME–DPSU–private sector value chains. Export Potential Several systems (Pinaka, radars, missiles) align with India’s defence export push. Way Forward — Policy & Capability Priorities Accelerate spiral development & modular upgrades. Deepen private-sector prime integration in complex platforms. Invest in materials, propulsion, EW & sensor fusion research. Expand dual-use & civilian spin-offs (cyber, space, disaster management). Strengthen export certification & after-sales frameworks. Jan Samarth Portal Why in News ? Credit Guarantee Scheme for Exporters (CGSE) made operational through the Jan Samarth Portal from 1 December 2025. In the first month (till 31 Dec 2025): 1,788 applications worth ₹8,599 crore received 716 sanctions worth ₹3,141 crore Government provides 100% credit guarantee for additional export-linked loans. Scheme supports liquidity, market diversification, competitiveness and employment, especially for MSME exporters. Relevance   GS 3 — Economy (Growth, MSMEs, Exports) Export competitiveness, market diversification, current-account stability MSME integration into global value chains; employment in export clusters Credit access & risk-sharing mechanisms to strengthen trade finance Counter-cyclical liquidity support during global economic headwinds Basics — Jan Samarth Portal  Launched: 2022 Purpose: National credit-linked schemes platform integrating banks & government schemes. Enables end-to-end digital processing: Eligibility check → Application → Approval → Tracking Covers schemes under DFS, MSME, Housing, Education, Agriculture, etc. For CGSE, it acts as the digital facilitation and monitoring platform. Credit Guarantee Scheme for Exporters (CGSE) — Key Features Implementing Ministry: Department of Financial Services (DFS), Ministry of Finance Guarantee Agency: NCGTC (National Credit Guarantee Trustee Company Ltd.) Beneficiaries: MSME and non-MSME exporters (direct & indirect exporters) Nature of Support: Additional collateral-free working capital Up to 20% of existing export credit / WC limits Government Guarantee: 100% guarantee on the additional facility Scheme Size / Cap: Up to ₹20,000 crore guarantees Validity: Till 31 March 2026 or till guarantees of ₹20,000 crore are issued Lending Agencies: Member Lending Institutions (MLIs) — banks & FIs Operational Objectives Cushion exporters during global uncertainty & trade headwinds Improve liquidity and business continuity Enable market diversification & competitiveness Support employment in export-oriented industries Reinforce macro–stability via export performance Context & Economic Significance Exports = ~21% of India’s GDP ~45 million people employed (direct + indirect) in export sectors MSMEs ≈ 45% of India’s total exports Sustained exports help: Current Account Balance Foreign exchange stability Manufacturing ecosystem & supply chains How CGSE Works ? Exporter applies via Jan Samarth Portal Bank assesses existing limit + 20% top-up eligibility Loan sanctioned without additional collateral NCGTC issues guarantee to the bank Reduces lender risk → increases credit flow to exporters Challenges / Risks Need to avoid over-leveraging of stressed MSMEs Monitoring of credit quality & end-use essential Awareness gap among smaller exporters / cluster firms Coordination needed between banks–NCGTC–DGFT ecosystems Way Forward Expand coverage to supply-chain vendors of export firms Faster portal-based turnaround time (TAT) Integrate with trade finance, invoice discounting, TReDS Encourage transition from short-term liquidity → capability upgrading Strengthen export credit analytics & risk scoring

Content Mob rule Between India and EU, a carbon gap and an FTA bridge Hate-linked Vigilantism Why in News? Late-2025 saw multiple mob-violence incidents across Kerala, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand and elsewhere where Indian citizens — mostly migrant workers and students — were falsely branded as “Bangladeshis” or “Chinese” and attacked. The pattern reflects: Rising xenophobic profiling based on language, region, appearance, or presumed nationality. A spill-over from political rhetoric on “illegal infiltration”, particularly in election-bound regions. Relevance GS-II (Polity & Governance) Vulnerable sections, constitutional morality, rule of law, federal policing responsibility Role of civil services, Centre–State coordination in law & order GS-III (Internal Security) Social tensions, misinformation, mob mobilisation through digital platforms Impact on labour mobility, urban security, and economic activity Practice Question Mob violence poses a serious challenge to constitutional morality and rule of law in India. Examine the structural causes behind the recent surge in identity-linked mob attacks and suggest institutional reforms to address them. (250 Words) What is Happening? Mob violence / lynching = extra-judicial killing/assault by a group claiming to enforce “suspicion-based justice”. Victims in these cases: Indian internal migrants and youth from the Northeast, Bengal, Odisha, Chhattisgarh etc. Trigger factors: identity demands, accent/language suspicion, racialised stereotypes, rumours amplified through social media. Scale, Patterns & Data  Internal migration: Census 2011 — 45.6 crore migrants (~37% of population); 2020-25 estimates place internal migrants at 55–60 crore. High-dependence states for migrant labour: Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Gujarat. Hate/mob crimes data: NCRB does not maintain a separate “lynching” category; such crimes appear under murder/rioting/assault. Independent trackers (academia/civil society) show post-2015 rise in identity-linked mob violence, especially where rumours of theft, cow-related suspicion, or “illegal immigrant” labels are invoked. Northeast discrimination trend: Multiple commissions have highlighted racial slurs, stereotyping, and targeted assaults against people from Northeastern states in metros. (Data caveat: absence of a statutory category means under-reporting and classification gaps.) Drivers — What Explains the Spike? Political narrative effects Election-time messaging around “illegal infiltration” (Bangladesh-linked) normalises suspicion against Bengali-speaking and migrant communities. Stereotyping & racialisation Northeastern Indians misidentified as “foreigners/Chinese”; linguistic profiling of workers from Bengal/Odisha. Weak deterrence Slow trials, poor investigation quality, low conviction in crowd-violence cases → mob impunity. Digital rumours & performative violence Filming and circulating assaults on social media → copy-cat behaviour and mob mobilisation. Labour precarity Migrant workers lack documents, networks, and bargaining power, increasing vulnerability to vigilante suspicion. Legal–Constitutional Lens Fundamental rights violated: Art. 14 (equality), Art. 15 (non-discrimination), Art. 19(1)(d)/(e) (movement/residence), Art. 21 (life & dignity). Applicable penal provisions: IPC/CrPC: 302 (murder), 307 (attempt to murder), 323/325 (hurt), 341/342 (wrongful restraint), 153A, 295A, 505 (hate speech & provocation), criminal conspiracy, unlawful assembly. Supreme Court — Tehseen Poonawalla (2018) guidelines: State nodal officers, preventive policing, fast-track trials, victim compensation, accountability of district administration. Implementation remains patchy. State-level initiatives (uneven): Anti-lynching bills/ordinances proposed or passed in some states (e.g., Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Manipur) — national framework still absent. Governance & Security Implications Internal security: fear among migrants → labour shortages, informalisation, social unrest in host states. Federal labour economy: sectors such as construction, hospitality, logistics, plantations depend heavily on migrants — violence threatens supply chains. Social cohesion: normalisation of vigilantism erodes rule of law and police legitimacy. Human rights & international image: recurring mob violence undermines India’s constitutional morality and commitments to equality and dignity. Editorial Overview Rhetoric around “infiltrators” creates moral licence for mobs to police identities. Policing responses limited to post-facto arrests rather than preventive intelligence, hotspot monitoring, and narrative correction. Absence of centralised data & statutory category prevents targeted policy action. Way Forward — Policy & Administrative Actions Implement SC anti-lynching guidelines in letter and spirit; designate nodal officers and district-level tasking. Create a statutory offence of mob lynching with command-responsibility and time-bound trial provisions. Data architecture: NCRB to add distinct categories for hate/mob crimes; disaggregate by motive and victim profile. Police reforms: Rumour-control protocols, social-media monitoring, early-warning grids in migrant-dense localities. Witness/victim protection & compensation. Political and civic messaging: bipartisan condemnation; avoidance of xenophobic election rhetoric; community outreach with employers and labour contractors. Migrant inclusion measures: registration, helplines, inter-state coordination cells, awareness of legal rights; grievance kiosks at workplaces and transport hubs. Education & sensitisation: anti-discrimination campaigns in schools, workplaces, and transport systems — especially regarding Northeast communities and inter-state migrants. Between India and EU, a carbon gap and an FTA bridge Why in News? From 1 January 2026, the EU will start imposing full tariffs under the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) on imports of steel, aluminium, cement, fertilizers, electricity, hydrogen, etc. Indian steel and aluminium exports to the EU already face higher compliance costs under the transition phase since October 2023. CBAM is emerging as a trade barrier + climate instrument, impacting India–EU trade, FTA negotiations, industrial competitiveness, and carbon pricing strategy. Relevance   GS-III (Economy | Environment | Industry) Green industrial transition, trade-climate nexus, carbon pricing, competitiveness Impact on steel, aluminium and MSME supply chains Practice Question CBAM represents the emergence of climate-aligned protectionism in global trade. Analyse its likely impact on India’s export competitiveness and suggest a policy roadmap for adaptation and resilience. (250 Words) What is CBAM? CBAM is the EU’s mechanism to equalise carbon costs between: EU producers covered under EU-ETS (carbon pricing) Foreign exporters whose countries lack similar carbon pricing. Importers must purchase CBAM certificates proportional to the embedded emissions during production. Covers only Scope-1 & Scope-2 emissions (fuel + electricity used in production). Transport and downstream emissions are excluded. Goal: Prevent carbon leakage (firms shifting production to low-regulation countries) and protect EU industry. What Changes for India? The tax may reduce 16–22% of the price actually received by Indian exporters due to: certificate cost, compliance expenses, buyer price discounts, renegotiated contracts. In FY2025, exports of Indian steel & aluminium to EU = $5.8 billion — already down 24% YoY, despite no carbon tax yet → anticipatory compliance burden. EU buyers are demanding lower prices upfront to hedge expected CBAM costs. How CBAM Liability is Calculated ? Benchmark EU carbon price ≈ €80 per tonne of CO₂ If exporters don’t submit verified plant-level data: EU applies default emission values (30–80% higher) → increases payable tax. From 2026, emissions must be ISO-14065 verified by EU-approved auditors → increases compliance cost. Sector-wise Impact Steel — Highest Risk Blast Furnace–Basic Oxygen Furnace (BF-BOF): Highest emissions → CBAM burden ~€80–€120 per tonne Could raise costs by 50–70%. Gas-based Direct Reduced Iron (DRI): Lower CBAM hit. Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) using scrap: lowest burden — favoured by CBAM. Aluminium Electricity-intensive → emissions linked to grid carbon factor. EU share in India’s aluminium exports ≈ 10% of global trade exposure. Competitiveness Comparison China’s carbon price ≈ 10% of EU level → much lower CBAM pass-through. Rich countries can absorb climate costs better → competitive asymmetry. Key Economic Effects Highlighted Pricing pressure on exporters (buyers discount prices to offset CBAM). Contract renegotiations and reopening of long-term supply agreements. Shift in supply chains toward: low-carbon technology, scrap-based/EAF routes, relocation to countries with carbon pricing alignment. Compliance & Governance Gaps Many firms lack: plant-level emissions measurement systems, verifiable data & auditors, internal carbon accounting. Risk of exporters relying on default EU emission factors → higher tax liability. Opportunities if India Responds Strategically Firms that measure accurately, verify early, and decarbonise can: retain margins, avoid deep price cuts, secure contracts via carbon-differentiated pricing. CBAM can act as a push factor for low-carbon industrial transition. Broader Trade & Policy Implications CBAM overlaps with India–EU FTA negotiations: India seeks market access + rules discipline. EU uses CBAM as climate-trade conditionality. The editorial frames CBAM also as: industrial protection + revenue generation tool for the EU, not merely a climate instrument. Strategic Risks for India Export erosion in high-emission sectors. Rising compliance costs → affects MSME suppliers. Possible trade diversion away from EU. Competitive disadvantage without: domestic carbon market, industrial decarbonisation incentives. Policy Priorities for India Domestic Carbon Pricing / Carbon Market (phased, industry-linked). Green steel pathway: EAF transition, scrap recycling, hydrogen pilots. National MRV framework: plant-level Measurement–Reporting–Verification. Financial support for energy-efficient retrofits. FTA strategy: secure transition support, mutual recognition of carbon accounting systems. Data ecosystem: emissions registries, verified auditors, standardised protocols. Critical Assessment CBAM reflects climate-aligned protectionism — climate goal + competitiveness shield. For India, the risk is not only tax burden but structural competitiveness loss if industrial decarbonisation lags. Early compliance + technology transition is economically superior to late adjustment.

Content Centre’s tobacco tax rejig to take effect from Feb. 1 Ancient Marathi literature reveals savannas are not degraded forests Why does India need climate- resilient agriculture? Ikkis: The story of 2nd Lt Arun Khetarpal & the Battle of Basantar Amazonian stingless bees first insects to get legal rights in the world Centre’s tobacco tax rejig to take effect from Feb. 1 Why in News ? The Union Finance Ministry has issued notifications to implement a new taxation regime on tobacco products from 1 February 2026 under the Central Excise (Amendment) Act, 2025. Key elements include: Revival and revision of excise duty on cigarettes (earlier reduced to a nominal level under GST). Enforcement of a cess on pan masala units under the Health Security and National Security Act, 2025. End of the GST Compensation Cess from 1 February. Revision of GST rates on tobacco products — beedis shifted to 18% (from the earlier 28% slab); other tobacco products moved to a 40% slab. The Ministry flagged that cigarette affordability has not declined in the past decade, contrary to global public-health guidance recommending annual real price increases through higher specific excise duties. Relevance   GS-3 (Economy) Taxation, GST architecture, cess vs tax, fiscal federalism, sin-tax economics, price elasticity. GS-2 (Health & Governance) Public health policy, NCDs, regulation of harmful products, Centre–State coordination. Conceptual Foundations  Indirect Taxes on Tobacco (Pre-GST vs Post-GST) Pre-GST: Central excise + State VAT + surcharges. Post-GST (2017): GST (12/18/28% slabs), plus GST Compensation Cess; central excise continued only on cigarettes (but reduced to a nominal level). Types of Tobacco Taxes Specific excise → fixed per unit (effective for health policy; raises price uniformly). Ad valorem tax → % of price (can be evaded via down-trading to cheaper brands). GST Compensation Cess (2017–2022, later extended) Purpose: compensate States for revenue losses due to GST implementation. Funded partly by cess on sin/luxury goods (incl. tobacco). Economic Rationale for “Sin Taxes” Correct negative externalities (health costs, productivity loss). Recommended by WHO-FCTC: regular increases in real prices; prefer specific excise. Price Elasticity of Demand for Tobacco Low but not zero; higher among youth & low-income users → taxation is an effective control tool. What Has Changed — Policy Moves from 1 Feb 2025 Excise Duty on Cigarettes Raised/Restored from nominal levels to a meaningful specific levy. Cess on Pan Masala Units brought into force under the 2025 Act. GST Compensation Cess Ends from 1 February. Re-structuring of GST Rates on Tobacco Beedis: moved to 18% category (from the now-defunct 28% slab). Other tobacco products: shifted to 40% slab. Policy Logic Cited by Government Cigarettes have become more affordable relative to income growth. Aim is to align with global public-health benchmarks mandating periodic excise hikes. Implications — Economy, Health, Governance Public Health Likely reduction in initiation and consumption over time, especially among youth. Supports NCD control, lowers long-term healthcare burden. Revenue & Fiscal Federalism Higher excise may boost Union revenues; cessation of compensation cess changes Centre–State fiscal dynamics. States may seek alternative revenue sources post-cess. Equity & Behavioural Effects Taxes are regressive in incidence but progressive in health gains (larger benefits for poorer households). Industry & Supply Chain Possible down-trading to cheaper/illicit products; need strong track-and-trace enforcement. Beedi sector largely informal → compliance and monitoring challenges. Trade & Compliance Risk of illicit cross-border trade → requires customs vigilance and FCTC-aligned controls. Analytical Perspectives  Does tobacco taxation balance revenue and health objectives? Compare specific vs ad valorem models; global lessons (WHO-FCTC, Thailand, Philippines). Post-GST cess withdrawal and States’ revenue space Options: buoyancy via GST expansion vs targeted sin-tax rationalisation. Beedi sector paradox High consumption, low taxation, informal labour → policy trade-offs (health vs livelihoods). Prelims-Ready Pointers Excise duty on cigarettes continues outside GST (Union power). Compensation Cess → designed to offset States’ GST revenue losses; ends from 1 Feb 2025. From 1 Feb 2025: Beedis → 18% GST category. Other tobacco products → 40% GST slab. Specific excise is considered more effective for tobacco control than ad valorem taxes. Way Forward  Periodic, inflation-indexed specific excise increases. Track-and-trace systems to curb illicit trade. Differential taxation aligned to harm continuum (discourage smoked forms strongly). Health-earmarked revenues for NCD prevention and cessation programmes. Support measures for workers/farmers in tobacco & beedi value chains during transition. Ancient Marathi literature reveals savannas are not degraded forests Why in News ? A new study published in People and Nature (British Ecological Society) shows that the savannas of western Maharashtra are ancient ecosystems, not degraded forests. Using medieval Marathi literature, oral traditions, archival records, and ecological evidence, researchers trace open tree–grass landscapes back at least 750 years, predating colonial timber extraction. The study challenges the prevailing narrative that savannas are the result of deforestation or anthropogenic degradation, and calls for distinct conservation policies that value both biodiversity and local culture. Relevance GS-1 (Geography / Indian Society) Physical geography of biomes, human–environment interactions, cultural landscapes. GS-3 (Environment & Ecology) Ecosystem classification, biodiversity conservation, grasslands vs forests, policy impacts. Basics — Concepts & Foundations What are Savannas? Mixed tree–grass ecosystems with open canopies, seasonal drought, and fire–grazing interactions. Characterised by thorny trees, drought-adapted shrubs, perennial grasses, and browsing-resilient species. Savannas vs Forests (Conceptual Difference) Savannas → Fire- and grazing-maintained, open, low tree density, grass-dominated. Closed Forests → Dense canopy, shade-tolerant species, fire-sensitive ecology. Indian Ecological Terminology (Historical) vana / jāgala → wild, open, drier landscapes (scrub, savanna, grasslands). anūpa → wetter marshes and closed forests. Modern misinterpretation equates vana with “dense forest”, leading to policy misclassification. Two Savanna Types in Maharashtra Fine-leaf savannas → drier belts (≤1000 mm rainfall). Broadleaf savannas → wetter belts (≥700 mm rainfall). Both co-occur across the 700–1000 mm rainfall zone. Evidence Base — What the Study Found ? Textual & Oral Records (13th–20th centuries) Sources: ovis, narrative poems, hagiographies, myths across Pune, Satara, Solapur, Sangli, Nashik. Recurrent descriptions of: thorny trees, grasslands, seasonal drought pastoral livelihoods & grazing landscapes Sacred landscapes (e.g., Shinganapur / Kothalāgirī) embed tree species as cultural symbols. Flora Identified (62 species) 27 savanna indicators; 14 forest species → strong signal of historic open-canopy ecologies. Key species: Vachellia leucophloea, Senegalia catechu, Capparis divaricata, Butea monosperma, and grasses like Sehima nervosum. Functional Traits Indicating Savanna Ecology thick bark, spines, clonal resprouting, fire & grazing tolerance. Triangulated with 11 Independent Evidence Lines Archival photos & paintings → sparsely wooded uplands. Colonial revenue records → pasture commons, hay meadows. Hunting logs & bird lists → savanna-specialist fauna. Hero stones → pastoral conflict & cattle raids. Archaeological evidence → blackbuck motifs, grazer remains in Chalcolithic contexts. Conclusion: Savannas are ancient and persistent ecosystems, not outcomes of recent deforestation. Why This Matters ?  Ecological Misclassification Problem Policies often treat savannas as “wastelands” or degraded forests → leads to: inappropriate afforestation/plantation drives, biodiversity loss (grassland fauna decline), disruption of pastoral livelihoods. Cultural-Ecological Linkages Savannas host sacred groves, pastoral traditions, ritual landscapes. Conservation must integrate local knowledge + biodiversity objectives. Conservation Reorientation Needed Manage as distinct ecosystems (fire-grazing dynamics, native grasses), Avoid blanket tree-plantation policies in open landscapes. Why does India need climate- resilient agriculture? Why in News ? Climate shocks, soil degradation, water stress, and rising input volatility are weakening India’s agricultural productivity and farmer incomes. A policy commentary highlights the need for Climate-Resilient Agriculture (CRA) — integrating biotechnology, bio-inputs, genome-edited seeds, precision & digital tools, and climate advisories — to safeguard food security while reducing ecological stress. Despite initiatives such as NICRA (ICAR, 2011) and the National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture (NMSA), adoption gaps, poor bio-input quality, digital divides, and fragmented policy coordination constrain progress. Relevance   GS-1 (Geography / Society) → climate variability, livelihoods, rainfed agriculture. GS-3 (Economy & Environment) → food security, agricultural productivity, biotechnology, sustainable agriculture, climate change adaptation, bio-inputs, resource efficiency. Concepts & Foundations  Climate-Resilient Agriculture (CRA): Core Idea Adapt farming systems to climate variability, extreme weather, and resource stress while maintaining productivity and environmental sustainability. Key Components Biotechnology tools — climate-tolerant & genome-edited crops (heat, drought, salinity, pest tolerance). Bio-inputs — biofertilizers, biopesticides, soil-microbiome approaches (reduced chemical dependence). Digital & AI tools — precision irrigation, crop-health monitoring, yield prediction, climate advisories. Climate-smart practices — zero tillage, residue management, SRI, aerobic/direct-seeded rice, diversified systems. Conceptual Distinction (Static) CRA ≠ only mitigation → mainly adaptation + risk-proofing agriculture. Linked syllabus themes: sustainability, food security, resource efficiency, technology & innovation. Why India Needs Climate-Resilient Agriculture ? High exposure to climate risk ~51% of net sown area is rainfed; produces ~40% of food → highly vulnerable to rainfall variability and drought. Rising frequency of climate extremes Heatwaves, erratic monsoons, floods, pest outbreaks → yield instability and income shocks. Degrading natural resources Soil nutrient depletion, groundwater stress, stubble burning, chemical-input dependency. Food security & demographic pressure Large and growing population → need stable, climate-proof productivity. Environmental health & sustainability CRA reduces chemical load, emissions, and ecosystem damage while preserving productivity. Where India Stands — Policies, Institutions, Initiatives NICRA (ICAR, 2011) 448 climate-resilient villages; demonstrated SRI, zero-till wheat, residue incorporation, climate-tolerant varieties, aerobic/direct-seeded rice. National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture (NMSA) Focus: rainfed areas, integrated farming, soil health, water-use efficiency, resource conservation. BioE3 Policy (recent) Positions CRA as a biotechnology-led adaptation pathway; promotes genome-edited crops and bio-inputs. Market & technology ecosystem Growing bio-input industry; expanding agritech & AI advisory platforms, precision irrigation, crop-monitoring tools. Key Challenges in Scaling CRA  Low adoption among small & marginal farmers Constraints: awareness, affordability, access to technologies & advisory services. Quality risks in bio-inputs Inconsistent standards for biofertilizers/biopesticides → distrust, poor outcomes. Slow rollout of climate-resilient / gene-edited seeds Uneven State-level distribution; regulatory caution slows diffusion. Digital divide Limited access to devices, connectivity, data literacy → weak penetration of AI/precision tools. Resource stress outpacing adaptation Soil degradation, water scarcity, rising climate volatility. Fragmented policy & institutional coordination Overlaps across agriculture, biotechnology, environment, and rural development → implementation friction. Why CRA is Strategic for India ? Risk-buffering for farmers → stabilises yields & incomes under climate uncertainty. Productivity with sustainability → reduces chemical dependence while improving soil & ecosystem health. Tech-led structural transformation → strengthens innovation, agri-value chains, and agri-startup ecosystems. Supports national priorities → food security, SDGs, NDC adaptation goals, water & soil conservation. Way Forward — Policy & Implementation Priorities Accelerate climate-tolerant & genome-edited crop deployment with strong regulatory clarity. Strengthen standards & certification for biofertilizers and biopesticides; build reliable supply chains. Last-mile digital inclusion → climate advisories, AI decision tools, precision farming access for smallholders. Financial enablers → climate insurance, concessional credit, transition incentives, outcome-based support. Integrated national CRA roadmap (BioE3-aligned) → unify biotechnology, climate adaptation, and agriculture policy for scale & coherence. Localised extension & capacity-building → community participation, farmer-producer organisations, region-specific packages. Prelims-Ready Pointers ~51% rainfed area → ~40% food output → high climate vulnerability. CRA tools: bio-inputs, genome-edited seeds, soil-microbiome insights, AI-based advisories, precision irrigation. Flagship initiatives: NICRA (ICAR), NMSA, BioE3-aligned biotechnology push. Key barriers: quality of bio-inputs, digital divide, slow seed rollout, fragmented coordination. Ikkis: The story of 2nd Lt Arun Khetrapal & the Battle of Basantar Why in News ? A recent feature revisits the Battle of Basantar (Indo-Pakistan War, 1971) through the story of Second Lieutenant Arun Khetrapal, the youngest recipient of the Param Vir Chakra. The narrative is linked to the film Ikkis, which portrays his courage during one of the most decisive tank battles on the western front of the 1971 war. Relevance GS-1 (History — Post-Independence India) Major wars, national security events, military leadership and heroism. GS-3 (Internal Security / Defence) Border security, armoured warfare, strategic geography (Shakargarh Bulge, riverine barriers). Context & Background Indo-Pakistan War of 1971: Two Fronts Eastern Theatre → Liberation of Bangladesh (offensive operations). Western Theatre → Objective was to contain Pakistan and prevent escalation; included key defensive–offensive battles such as Basantar. Location Shakargarh Bulge (between the Ravi & Chenab rivers, near Jammu–Pathankot axis). A strategic wedge—if Pakistan broke through, it could threaten Punjab, Pathankot, and access to Kashmir. Battle of Basantar (Dec 1971) — Core Idea Indian aim: secure a bridgehead across the Basantar river, block Pakistani armoured thrusts, and hold territory under heavy counter-attacks. Operational Overview — What Happened ? Indian Advance Indian armoured & infantry units crossed the heavily mined Basantar river, creating a bridgehead under intense fire. Pakistani Counter-attacks Multiple Patton tank assaults to dislodge Indian forces. Role of 2nd Lt Arun Khetrapal (Poona Horse Regiment) Refused to abandon his burning tank, fought on, and destroyed several enemy tanks. Continued firing despite being ordered to withdraw; died in action after disabling another advancing tank. His actions were pivotal in breaking the Pakistani assault and holding the bridgehead. Decorated Soldier — Key Facts for Prelims 2nd Lt Arun Khetrapal Param Vir Chakra (Posthumous) — youngest recipient. National Defence Academy parade ground and gates at IMA, Dehradun & NDA, Khadakwasla named in his honour. Strategic Significance of the Battle Military Significance Prevented Pakistan from penetrating the western sector. Secured the Pathankot–Jammu axis, protecting vital logistics corridors. Psychological & Doctrinal Impact Demonstrated armoured warfare capabilities and combined-arms coordination. Reinforced the role of defensive-offensive operations on active borders. War Outcome Context Contributed to favourable ceasefire terms on the western front. Overview Shakargarh Bulge as a Vulnerability Natural salient projecting into India → high-value defensive priority. Armour vs Armour Battles in South Asia Basantar illustrates terrain–engineering–minefield integration as decisive in tank warfare. Role of Individual Leadership in War Outcomes Tactical courage at the platoon level can shape operational success. Prelims-Ready Pointers Battle of Basantar → Western Front, Dec 1971, Shakargarh Bulge. Regiment involved → Poona Horse (armoured regiment). Award → Param Vir Chakra (youngest awardee). Objective → Hold bridgehead across Basantar; repel Pakistani tank counter-attacks. Way Forward Preserve battlefields & regimental histories as military-heritage resources. Integrate lessons on combined arms, logistics protection, and armoured tactics in professional military education. Use biographies and films to strengthen public awareness of national security history. Amazonian stingless bees first insects to get legal rights in the world Why in News ? A municipal ordinance in Satipo, Peru (Amazon region) has granted legal rights to native Amazonian stingless bees — the first case in the world where insects have been recognised as rights-bearing entities. The Declaration of Rights for Native Stingless Bees grants them the right to exist, thrive, restore habitats, live in pollution-free environments, and be legally represented in cases of harm. The initiative was led by Amazon Research Internacional (Rosa Vásquez Espinoza) in collaboration with the Earth Law Center, aligning Indigenous ecological knowledge and Rights-of-Nature jurisprudence. Relevance GS-3 (Environment & Ecology) Biodiversity conservation, pollinators, ecosystem services, invasive species, climate impacts. Environmental governance, Rights of Nature, community-based conservation. Concepts & Foundations Rights of Nature — Core Idea A legal-philosophical approach where ecosystems or species possess inherent legal rights, independent of human use-value. Earlier examples: Whanganui River (New Zealand, 2017) — granted legal personhood. Ganga & Yamuna (India, 2017—judicial recognition, later limited in scope). Amazon & Andes jurisdictions — constitutional or municipal nature-rights frameworks (Ecuador, Bolivia). What Makes This Case Distinct First time a specific insect group has been recognised as a legal rights holder rather than merely a protected species. Who Are Stingless Bees? (Ecology Basics) Ancient lineage of bees; non-stinging, cavity-nesting, highly social species. Keystone rainforest pollinators — pollinate >80% of Amazon flora and crops like coffee, cocoa, avocado, blueberries. Culturally important to Indigenous Amazonian communities (medicine, livelihoods, rituals). What the Ordinance Recognises  Right to exist and thrive Right to maintain healthy populations Right to a pollution-free habitat Right to ecologically stable climatic conditions Right to regenerate natural cycles Right to legal representation in cases of threat or harm Implication: Harm to bees or their habitats can be pursued as a legal injury. Why Protection Was Needed ?— Risk Drivers Climate change → heat stress, rainfall disruption Deforestation & habitat loss Pesticide exposure Competition from introduced European honeybees Erosion of Indigenous knowledge systems Significance — Governance, Law, Environment Shift from conservation-as-resource to conservation-as-rights Recognises species as moral and legal stakeholders. Integration of Indigenous knowledge & modern science Supports biocultural heritage preservation. Precedent-setting value Could influence municipal and national biodiversity laws globally. Operational Challenges Defining guardianship & representation mechanisms. Balancing economic uses (apiculture, agriculture) with species-rights claims. Monitoring compliance in remote rainforest landscapes. Prelims-Ready Pointers First insects to receive legal rights → Amazonian stingless bees (Peru, Satipo ordinance). Key rationale → ecological keystone role + Indigenous cultural significance. Rights granted include existence, healthy populations, habitat protection, climate stability, regeneration, legal representation. Led by Rosa Vásquez Espinoza (Amazon Research Internacional) with Earth Law Center. Pollinate >80% of Amazonian flora and several global crops. Way Forward Strengthen pollinator protection frameworks (wild bees beyond honeybees). Integrate community stewardship and traditional knowledge into conservation. Promote pesticide regulation, habitat corridors, diversified agro-ecosystems. Explore rights-based or trustee-based models for critical ecosystems/species where appropriate.