Content Indian Navy to Commission Anjadip(ASW-SWC) Zero Defect, Zero Effect (ZED) & India’s Quality-Led Manufacturing Push Indian Navy to Commission Anjadip (ASW-SWC) Why is it in News? The Indian Navy is commissioning INS Anjadip, the 3rd vessel of the 8-ship ASW Shallow Water Craft project, on 27 February 2026 under the Eastern Naval Command. The induction strengthens India’s shallow-water Anti-Submarine Warfare capability and marks progress in indigenous warship construction by Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers under Aatmanirbhar Bharat. Relevance GS Paper III Security: Maritime security, coastal defence, submarine warfare. Defence indigenisation & Atmanirbhar Bharat. Infrastructure: Ports, EEZ security. Science & Technology in defence systems. Project & Platform Specifics 3rd vessel under 8-ship ASW Shallow Water Craft (ASW-SWC) project. Built by Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers. Inducted into Eastern Naval Command. Length: 77 metres. Maximum speed: ~25 knots. Propulsion: Water-jet system (suited for shallow draught operations). Primary sensor: Indigenous Hull Mounted Sonar (HMS) “Abhay”. Armament: Lightweight torpedoes (short-range ASW engagement). ASW rocket launchers (area saturation capability). Quantified Maritime Context India’s coastline: ~11,098.81 km. India’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ): ~2.37 million sq km. ~95% of India’s trade by volume and ~70% by value moves by sea. 12 major ports + 200+ non-major ports vulnerable to submarine infiltration in crisis scenarios. Bay of Bengal accounts for critical energy and container traffic towards East Asia. Strategic Threat Matrix (Submarine Dimension) Diesel-electric submarines (SSK) operate effectively in <200 m depth zones. Shallow water creates: High acoustic reverberation. Reduced sonar detection ranges. China operates 50+ submarines (mix of nuclear & diesel-electric). Increased PLAN submarine port calls in Indian Ocean since 2013. Dedicated shallow-water ASW platforms fill gap not efficiently covered by: 6 Scorpene-class submarines. 7–8 ASW corvettes (Kamorta class). Capability Gap Being Addressed Before ASW-SWC: Frigates/destroyers (~3,000–7,000 tonnes) not optimal for shallow waters. Limited number of dedicated ASW corvettes (~4 Kamorta-class operational). ASW-SWC Contribution: Specialised shallow-water detection role. High manoeuvrability due to water-jet propulsion. Faster coastal response cycle. Harbour defence reinforcement. Technological Significance Indigenous HMS “Abhay”: Reduces dependence on imported sonar systems. High indigenous content (recent naval platforms ~70–75% indigenous as per MoD data). Enhances: Indigenous underwater acoustics capability. Naval systems integration ecosystem. Water-jet propulsion: Lower cavitation. Improved control in low-depth zones. Economic Security Linkage India imports ~85% of crude oil (major portion via sea). LNG terminals and offshore platforms concentrated along coast. Any submarine-based disruption impacts: Energy security. Trade insurance premiums. Port operations. Industrial & Aatmanirbhar Dimension Built domestically by GRSE (Defence PSU). Boosts: Indigenous warship design capability. MSME vendor ecosystem (hundreds of suppliers per naval platform). Reflects shift from import-heavy 1990s to largely indigenous surface fleet construction. Prelims Pointers ASW-SWC = Shallow Water Craft (not frigate/destroyer). Length: 77 m. Speed: 25 knots. GRSE = Kolkata-based Defence PSU. EEZ of India: ~2.37 million sq km. Eastern Naval Command HQ: Visakhapatnam. Diesel-electric submarines are quieter than nuclear submarines in coastal waters. Practice Question “India’s maritime security architecture requires specialised shallow-water capabilities to counter emerging submarine threats.” Examine in light of recent naval inductions. (15M) Zero Defect, Zero Effect (ZED) & India’s Quality-Led Manufacturing Push Context Piyush Goyal (Minister of Commerce and Industry of India) at the National Quality Conclave (Feb 2026) reiterated PM’s “Zero Defect, Zero Effect” vision as the core of India’s manufacturing strategy for: $30–35 trillion economy by 2047   $2 trillion exports target (within 6–7 years) $1 trillion merchandise $1 trillion services Leveraging 9 FTAs covering 38 developed countries (≈ two-thirds of global GDP/trade) Institutional Anchors: Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) Quality Council of India (QCI) Relevance GS Paper III Industrial policy. Export competitiveness. MSME development. Environmental sustainability (CBAM). Technology in manufacturing. Static Background “Zero Defect, Zero Effect” (ZED) Launched in 2014 to: Ensure Zero Defect → high-quality, globally competitive products. Ensure Zero Effect → minimal environmental footprint. Primarily MSME–focused. Linked with: Make in India Atmanirbhar Bharat Export Promotion Mission National Manufacturing Policy (2011 – 25% GDP manufacturing target, not achieved) Quality Architecture in India BIS Act, 2016 – Mandatory standards & QCOs. National Accreditation Board (under QCI). WTO compliance: SPS (Sanitary and Phytosanitary) TBT (Technical Barriers to Trade) REACH (EU chemicals regulation) CBAM (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism – EU) Data & Evidence   India: 4th largest economy  Manufacturing share ≈ 15–17% of GDP (stagnant) Global trade share: ~2% of global merchandise exports MSMEs: ~30% of GDP ~45% of exports 11+ crore employment (MoMSME data) FTAs: UAE CEPA (2022) Australia ECTA (2022) Ongoing: EU, UK, Canada etc. Quality Gap Indicators: High rejection rates in pharma & agri exports due to SPS non-compliance. Textile sector faces sustainability scrutiny (water use, carbon intensity). Multi-Dimensional Analysis I. Constitutional / Legal Dimension Article 19(1)(g): Freedom of trade subject to reasonable restrictions (standards & safety). Article 21: Right to life includes right to safe products (Consumer Protection Act, 2019). Article 51(c): International law obligations → WTO TBT/SPS compliance. Environmental standards under: Environment Protection Act, 1986 Air/Water Acts Legal shift: From voluntary to mandatory Quality Control Orders (QCOs). II. Governance / Administrative Dimension Five-Pillar Roadmap Announced: SOP-based strict compliance from raw material to finished goods. Skilling & re-skilling (reduce wastage, enhance productivity). Gap analysis & benchmarking with global best practices. Streamlined testing & certification. Modern shared testing infrastructure in clusters. Administrative Innovations: 20+ cities consultations. 14 manufacturing clusters. 50+ regulators involved. “Gunvatta Manthan” dialogue mechanism → participatory governance. Shift: From inspection raj → quality ecosystem approach. From dual quality (export vs domestic) → uniform high standards. III. Economic Dimension A. Export Competitiveness FTAs give market access but: Non-tariff barriers increasing. Quality determines real market penetration. High-Potential Sectors: Textiles, Leather, Footwear, Pharmaceuticals Without quality: Tariff concessions ineffective, Trade deficits persist. B. Productivity & Cost Quality reduces: Rejections, Logistics returns, Warranty costs Enhances: Brand India, Value addition, Movement up Global Value Chains (GVCs) C. $30–35 Trillion Economy Target Requires: 8–9% sustained real growth. Manufacturing expansion to 22–25% of GDP. Quality-led capital deepening. IV. Social / Ethical Dimension Consumer dignity → No second-grade domestic products. Replacing “chalta hai” mindset with excellence culture. Employment quality: Skilled labour > informal low-skill labour. Inclusivity: MSMEs access global markets. Reduces regional disparities. Ethical Business Governance: ESG compliance. Transparency in certification. V. Environmental Dimension (Zero Effect) Sustainability embedded in exports. CBAM exposure: Steel, aluminium, cement, fertilisers. Textile sector: Water-intensive. Chemical discharge concerns. Shift required: Energy efficiency Circular economy Cleaner production technologies VI. Technology Dimension Automation in testing labs. Digital conformity assessment. AI-driven quality control. Blockchain for supply chain traceability. Industry 4.0 adoption. VII. Security / Strategic Dimension Quality = strategic credibility. Pharma reliability → health diplomacy. Defence exports require stringent quality standards. Supply chain resilience. Challenges / Structural Gaps Institutional Fragmented regulatory ecosystem. Overlapping certifications. State-level enforcement gaps. MSME Constraints High compliance costs. Limited testing infrastructure. Awareness deficit. Federal Issues States vary in industrial inspection regimes. Lack of harmonised enforcement. Capacity Constraints Shortage of accredited labs. Skill mismatch in workforce. Global Pressures Rising green protectionism. CBAM compliance costs. ESG audit burdens. Critical Evaluation Strengths: Institutionalisation via DPIIT + QCI. Cluster-based consultations. FTA alignment with quality push. Risks: Over-regulation could hurt MSMEs. Compliance-heavy model may increase informalisation. Infrastructure creation without behavioural change ineffective. Way Forward  National Quality Roadmap – legally harmonised standards. Unified digital quality portal (single-window certification). Cluster-based common testing labs (PPP mode). ZED incentives linked to PLI schemes. Carbon accounting support fund for MSMEs. State-level Quality Missions aligned with Ease of Doing Business. Skill India + Apprenticeship integration with quality modules. Export Rejection Data Dashboard for real-time corrective action. Alignment: SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation) SDG 12 (Responsible Production) Article 38 (Social Order) Cooperative federalism. Prelims Pointers ZED focuses on MSMEs. QCI is not a constitutional/statutory body; it is a public-private partnership. BIS Act, 2016 replaced 1986 Act. SPS and TBT are WTO agreements. CBAM is EU’s carbon border tax mechanism. Manufacturing share in GDP ~15–17% (not 25%). Practice Question “Quality, not cost arbitrage, will determine India’s export competitiveness in the coming decades.” Discuss in the context of recent policy initiatives. (15M)

Content India’s Energy Shift Through the Green Ammonia Route Stick together India’s Energy Shift Through the Green Ammonia Route Source : The Hindu A. Why in News? At India Energy Week 2026, PM highlighted $500 billion investment opportunity in energy transition, signalling shift from energy security to energy independence. SECI concluded landmark green ammonia auction under SIGHT (National Green Hydrogen Mission), institutionalising aggregated procurement. Discovered prices:₹49.75–64.74/kg ($572–744/tonne), nearly 40–50% lower than EU’s H2Global benchmarks. Contracts include 10-year fixed-price offtake agreements with fertiliser plants, ensuring long-term revenue certainty. B. Relevance GS II National Green Hydrogen Mission (2023) as strategic industrial policy. Climate commitments: Net-zero 2070, updated NDCs. Trade dimension: CBAM, hydrogen corridors, green certification regimes. GS III Energy transition & renewable integration. Industrial decarbonisation (fertiliser, shipping, power). Green finance, PPP, blended finance. Technology-led competitiveness in green manufacturing. C. Static Background 1. What is Green Ammonia? Produced by combining nitrogen (air separation) with green hydrogen via electrolysis powered by renewables. Unlike grey ammonia (natural gas-based), green ammonia is near-zero carbon, avoiding emissions from steam methane reforming. India is 2nd largest ammonia producer; nearly 80% consumption in fertiliser sector. Heavy dependence on LNG imports for grey ammonia exposes sector to global gas volatility. 2. Policy Framework National Green Hydrogen Mission (2023) targets 5 MTPA green hydrogen by 2030. SIGHT Programme provides production-linked incentives and aggregated demand aggregation via SECI. Strategic ambition: Position India as global hub for green hydrogen derivatives. Nodal agency: Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI). D. Economic Analysis 1. Price Discovery & Competitiveness Auction prices:₹49.75–64.74/kg ($572–744/tonne) versus grey ammonia at ~$515/tonne. Cost gap narrowed due to: 10-year fixed contracts. Production subsidies of ₹8.82/kg, ₹7.06/kg, ₹5.3/kg (tapering first three years). Price certainty shields producers from: Gas market volatility. Currency fluctuations. Geopolitical supply disruptions. 2. Market Design Innovation Aggregated procurement: 724,000 tonnes/year across 13 fertiliser plants. Pre-identified coastal delivery points enable shipping-based logistics. Auction saw 15 bidders, 7 awardees, enhancing competition and transparency. Contracts substitute nearly 30% of ammonia imports, improving trade balance. Compared to EU H2Global and Korea’s CHPS, India achieved broader participation and lower discovered prices. E. Strategic & Geopolitical Dimension 1. Energy Independence Shift India imports nearly 85% crude oil and relies on LNG for ammonia production. Green ammonia supports transition toward renewable-driven hydrogen economy and domestic industrial base. 2. Climate Diplomacy Contributes to Net-zero 2070 and 50% non-fossil capacity by 2030 targets. Export potential to: EU (CBAM exposure). Japan & South Korea (hydrogen import strategies). Enhances India’s credibility as clean energy supplier to Global South and OECD markets. 3. Maritime Fuel Future Green ammonia emerging as marine bunker fuel alternative. Aligns with IMO decarbonisation pathway for global shipping. Potential integration with port-led development under Sagarmala framework. F. Environmental Dimension Benefits Avoids CO₂ emissions from steam methane reforming. Decarbonises fertiliser supply chain, reducing embedded emissions. Enables movement toward circular nitrogen economy. Risks Ammonia toxicity and storage hazards. High water demand for electrolysis. Renewable intermittency affecting hydrogen production stability. Mitigation Hybrid renewable systems with storage integration. Strengthened industrial safety codes. Harmonised green certification standards aligned with global norms. G. Financial & Infrastructure Dimension Bankability Drivers 10-year fixed-price contracts enhance revenue stability. Blended finance and risk-mitigation instruments improve project viability. Sovereign-backed payment structures increase lender confidence. Infrastructure Requirements Dedicated renewable energy parks. Port storage terminals and ammonia handling facilities. Pipelines and cracking infrastructure. Robust monitoring and certification systems. H. Governance & Regulatory Challenges Regulatory clarity on grid access and banking provisions. Harmonised green taxonomy and certification. Alignment with evolving EU and OECD standards. First-mover risks and financial closure constraints. I. Critical Evaluation Strengths Aggregated demand reduces fragmentation. Competitive pricing relative to global benchmarks. Long-tenor contracts improve investor confidence. India’s low renewable tariffs provide structural advantage. Risks Fiscal sustainability of production subsidies. Land acquisition and grid integration constraints. Export market volatility. Technology obsolescence risk in rapidly evolving hydrogen economy. Core Insight India’s competitive edge lies in cheap renewables + scale + institutional innovation, enabling early-mover advantage in green ammonia markets. J. Way Forward Develop Green Ammonia Export Corridors (India–EU, India–Japan). Integrate green ammonia under PLI schemes for fertilisers. Establish nationally recognised green certification framework. Expand coastal storage and shipping infrastructure. Promote R&D in ammonia cracking technologies. Introduce Carbon Contracts for Difference (CCfD). Create dedicated green hydrogen trading exchange. Align with SDG 7, SDG 9, SDG 13 and Just Energy Transition principles. K. Prelims Pointers Green ammonia = nitrogen + green hydrogen. SIGHT operates under National Green Hydrogen Mission. SECI aggregates demand and conducts auctions. Grey ammonia derived from natural gas (SMR process). Target: 5 MTPA green hydrogen by 2030. Ammonia can function as marine fuel and hydrogen carrier. L. Practice Mains Question Discuss how green ammonia can bridge India’s transition from energy security to energy independence. (15M) Stick together Source : The Hindu A. Why in News? State visit (2026) of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva to India reaffirmed deepening India–Brazil strategic partnership amid global trade turbulence. Both nations agreed to double bilateral trade to $30 billion by 2030, signalling diversification beyond traditional commodity exchanges. MoUs signed on critical minerals, steel & mining, digital cooperation, aiming to reduce overdependence on China-centric supply chains. Visit occurred amid U.S.-imposed 50% tariffs on both countries and uncertainty after U.S. Supreme Court ruling on tariff authority. Leaders reaffirmed commitment to multilateral order, WTO centrality, and Global South solidarity. B. Relevance GS II India–Brazil bilateral relations and South–South cooperation. Reform of UNSC, WTO, Bretton Woods institutions. Multilateralism vs unilateral trade regimes. GS III Trade wars, protectionism, tariff weaponisation. Critical minerals security and supply chain resilience. Biofuel cooperation and alternative energy diplomacy. C. Static Background 1. Institutional Groupings India and Brazil are members of: BRICS – emerging economy bloc promoting multipolarity. IBSA (India–Brazil–South Africa Dialogue Forum) – democratic South–South platform. G20 – global macroeconomic coordination forum. G-4 (India, Brazil, Germany, Japan) – UNSC reform coalition. Co-founders of Global Biofuels Alliance (2023). BRICS’ New Development Bank (NDB) headquartered in Shanghai. Significance of Platforms Push for reform of Bretton Woods institutions. Greater voice for developing nations in global decision-making. Exploration of alternative financial mechanisms and local currency trade. D. Economic & Trade Dimension 1. Bilateral Trade Current trade stands near $15 billion; target of $30 billion by 2030. Key sectors: Agriculture (soy, sugar, meat). Pharmaceuticals. Engineering goods. Energy and biofuels. 2. Trade Diversification Strategy Reduce reliance on China-dominated supply chains. Cooperation in lithium, rare earths, steel, mining. Strengthen industrial resilience through diversified sourcing. 3. U.S. Tariff Shock Both nations faced 50% tariffs under U.S. reciprocal measures. Additional scrutiny linked to: BRICS alignment. Russian oil imports. Iran trade. Reflects weaponisation of trade policy and erosion of WTO norms. E. Geopolitical & Strategic Analysis 1. Global South Assertion Lula’s “unionise” metaphor emphasises collective bargaining power. Advocates coordinated approach instead of fragmented bilateral concessions. Reaffirms commitment to WTO-centred multilateralism and sovereign equality. 2. BRICS in Transition Expanded BRICS membership enhances representational legitimacy. Push for local currency settlements and alternative financial rails. Faces Western scepticism and possible sanctions pressures. 3. UNSC Reform Push India and Brazil seek permanent membership through G-4 coalition. Reform stalled due to P5 resistance and geopolitical rivalries. Convergence strengthens moral claim for equitable representation. F. Energy & Climate Cooperation Collaboration in bioethanol and renewable technologies. Coordinated stance on climate equity and just energy transition. Brazil: Global leader in bioethanol exports. India: 20% ethanol blending target achieved ahead of schedule trajectory. Supports green growth and South–South energy cooperation. G. Strategic Autonomy Dimension India balances Quad engagement with BRICS participation, avoiding bloc politics. Brazil pursues independent foreign policy rooted in strategic autonomy. Shared preference for multipolarity over bipolar confrontation. Emphasis on diversified partnerships amid global volatility. H. Risks & Constraints 1. Internal Constraints Brazil’s election cycle may disrupt diplomatic continuity. India–U.S. trade negotiations require calibrated diplomacy. 2. Structural Limits BRICS lacks enforcement or dispute resolution mechanisms. IBSA has limited operational momentum. WTO dispute settlement system remains weakened. 3. Divergences Different engagement patterns with China. Varied regional security priorities. Geographic distance increases logistics costs. I. Critical Evaluation Strengths High institutional density: BRICS + IBSA + G20 + G-4. Complementary economic structures. Shared Global South narrative in governance reform. Limitations Bilateral trade modest compared to China–Brazil trade. Limited private sector integration. Symbolic rhetoric often exceeds economic depth. Core Insight Strategic convergence must move beyond symbolism toward institutionalised economic integration and supply chain interdependence. J. Way Forward Fast-track feasibility of Preferential Trade Agreement. Operationalise local currency trade settlements. Establish India–Brazil Critical Minerals Corridor. Revitalise IBSA as democratic Global South forum. Submit coordinated proposals for WTO and UNSC reform. Develop BRICS-based supply chain resilience framework. Expand membership of Global Biofuels Alliance. Align cooperation with SDG 17 (Global Partnerships) and reform-based multilateralism. K. Prelims Pointers IBSA comprises India, Brazil, South Africa; separate from BRICS. G-4 includes India, Brazil, Germany, Japan. BRICS’ New Development Bank headquartered in Shanghai. Global Biofuels Alliance launched at G20 Delhi Summit 2023. Brazil is world’s largest exporter of ethanol. L. Practice Mains Question India–Brazil relations reflect the resurgence of Global South diplomacy. Discuss. (15M)

Content Centre Unveils National Counter Terrorism Policy (PRAHAAR) Neurotoxin (Tetrodotoxin) Suspicion in Kerala Seafood Deaths On the Independence of the Election Commission of India C. Rajagopalachari (Rajaji): Legacy and Contemporary Relevance India as a Major Contributor to Global Pesticide Toxicity India and the International Energy Agency (IEA) Membership Debate Organ Donation in India: The Deceased Donor Challenge National Monetisation Pipeline (NMP) 2.0 and Infrastructure Financing Centre unveils policy to tackle terrorism threats A. Why in News? Ministry of Home Affairs released first integrated National Counter Terrorism Policy – PRAHAAR (2026), formalising multi-domain response to evolving terror threats. Policy recognises threats across land, water and air. Notes increasing cyber intrusions on power grids and financial systems, especially post-2020 digital expansion. Emphasises protection of critical sectors contributing >50% of GDP, including power, transport, ports and atomic installations. Relevance : GS Paper III Internal security challenges Cyber security, drone threats, hybrid warfare Critical infrastructure protection B. Threat Landscape  1. Cross-Border Terrorism India has faced sustained infiltration attempts along LoC and IB, with dozens of infiltration bids detected annually. Global groups such as ISIS affiliates and Al-Qaeda-linked outfits have attempted recruitment in South Asia. 2. Drone & UAV Threats Punjab Police reported hundreds of drone sightings (2021–23) near border areas linked to arms and narcotics drops. Drones enable low-cost asymmetric warfare, bypassing conventional surveillance systems. India has begun deploying indigenous anti-drone systems by DRDO and private sector firms. 3. Maritime Vulnerability India’s coastline spans 11,098 km, with 12 major ports and 200+ non-major ports. Nearly 95% of India’s trade by volume moves by sea, making ports high-value targets. 4. Cyber Terrorism India ranks among top countries facing cyber-attacks on financial and power infrastructure (CERT-In reports). Rapid digitalisation post-2020 increased vulnerability of UPI, digital banking and smart grid systems. Hybrid warfare now includes cyber sabotage combined with physical attacks. C. Legal & Institutional Architecture UAPA (1967, amended 2019) empowers designation of individuals as terrorists. NIA Act, 2008 allows Centre to assume jurisdiction over terror investigations across States. Multi-Agency Centre (MAC) created post-26/11 to integrate intelligence inputs. India participates in FATF and complies with global anti-terror financing standards. D. Critical Infrastructure Protection India’s power sector capacity exceeds 420 GW installed capacity, making grid security crucial. Aviation sector handles over 300 million passengers annually, creating high-risk nodes. Atomic energy facilities and space installations represent strategic national assets. National Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Centre (NCIIPC) safeguards digital backbone. E. Governance & Federal Challenges Law and order falls under State List (List II), complicating centralised counter-terror action. Variation in policing capacity: metro cities better equipped than smaller States. Past debate over National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC) stalled due to federal concerns. F. Strategic Significance Terrorism increasingly linked with organised crime, narcotics trade and encrypted communications. Recognises shift toward hybrid and grey-zone warfare tactics. Aligns India with structured CT frameworks like U.S. National Counterterrorism Strategy. Integrates homeland security with economic resilience and digital security. G. Challenges Balancing preventive detention with Article 21 privacy protections (Puttaswamy 2017). Need for advanced AI-based predictive analytics for early threat detection. Ensuring judicial oversight to prevent misuse of terror laws. Funding constraints in upgrading anti-drone and cyber-forensic infrastructure nationwide. H. Way Forward Establish federal coordination body with safeguards to respect State autonomy. Expand coastal radar chain and anti-drone grid coverage along vulnerable borders. Strengthen cyber forensic labs and digital intelligence capacity. Conduct mandatory critical infrastructure security audits across sectors annually. Deepen cooperation with Interpol, FATF and UN Counter Terrorism Office. I.Prelims Pointers UAPA 2019 amendment allows individual terrorist designation. NIA Act 2008 enables central takeover of terror investigations. India’s coastline: 11,098 km. NCIIPC protects critical digital infrastructure. Law and order: State subject under Constitution. J. Practice Question Discuss how India’s National Counter Terrorism Policy reflects the shift from conventional to multi-domain security threats. (15M) Neurotoxin (TTX) Suspicion in Kerala Seafood Deaths  A. Why in News? Doctors in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala (2026) suspect Tetrodotoxin (TTX) poisoning after seafood consumption at Vizhinjam, causing multiple hospitalisations and two deaths within hours. Rapid onset of neurological symptoms and respiratory paralysis clinically consistent with TTX exposure, not bacterial food poisoning. Samples reportedly linked to red snapper (chemmeen/chempalli) sourced from Tamil Nadu coast; fish roe suspected contamination site. Incident highlights risks from marine biotoxins, extreme heat-stable compounds unaffected by routine cooking. Relevance : GS Paper III Environmental pollution & marine ecosystems Climate change & harmful algal blooms Food safety and public health risks GS Paper II Public health governance Food Safety regulatory mechanisms B. What is Tetrodotoxin (TTX)? Tetrodotoxin (TTX) is a potent marine neurotoxin, found in pufferfish, certain reef fish, octopus, and marine bacteria. Blocks voltage-gated sodium channels (Na⁺ channels) in nerve membranes, preventing nerve impulse transmission. Estimated lethal dose in humans is approximately 1–2 mg, making it one of the most potent non-protein neurotoxins. Classified internationally under Schedule 1 chemical threat monitoring categories due to high lethality and no antidote. C. Prelims Pointers Tetrodotoxin (TTX) blocks sodium channels in nerve cells. TTX is heat-stable, not destroyed by normal cooking. No specific antidote exists; treatment is supportive. Marine biotoxins often linked to algal blooms. India’s seafood exports exceed $8 billion annually. D. Practice Questions Examine the public health and biosecurity implications of marine neurotoxins in the context of climate change. (15M) On the Independence of the Election Commission (EC)  A. Why in News? Opposition alliance proposed motion to remove the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) amid allegations linked to Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. Around 65 lakh voter names reportedly deleted during SIR exercise in Bihar(2025), matter challenged before the Supreme Court. Controversy also surrounds the Chief Election Commissioner and other ECs (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Terms of Office) Act, 2023. Relevance : GS Paper II Constitutional bodies Article 324, 326 Basic Structure doctrine Electoral reforms B. Constitutional Foundations of EC Independence Article 324 vests superintendence, direction and control of elections in a permanent Election Commission. Adult franchise guaranteed under Article 326, forming core democratic principle of universal suffrage. In Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975), free and fair elections recognised as part of the Basic Structure doctrine. EC conducts elections to President, Vice-President, Parliament and State Legislatures, underscoring its national constitutional mandate. C. Appointment Controversy (2023 Act) 2023 Act provides selection committee comprising Prime Minister, Union Minister and Leader of Opposition. Supreme Court in Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India (2023) had included Chief Justice of India (CJI) in interim selection mechanism. Removal of CJI from statutory committee triggered concerns about executive dominance. Act challenged in Jaya Thakur v. Union of India (2024); next hearing scheduled for March 2026. D. Tenure & Service Safeguards CEC holds office for 6 years or until age 65, whichever earlier, under 2023 Act. Under Article 324(5), service conditions cannot be varied to CEC’s disadvantage during tenure. Financial independence ensured through charged expenditure on Consolidated Fund of India. Permanency of EC structure strengthens institutional continuity. E. Removal Procedure – Strong Constitutional Safeguard CEC removal follows procedure under Article 324(5) read with Article 124(4) (same as Supreme Court judge). Grounds limited to proved misbehaviour or incapacity, ensuring high constitutional threshold. Motion requires: Minimum 100 Lok Sabha members or 50 Rajya Sabha members (Judges Inquiry Act, 1968). Speaker/Chairman may admit or refuse motion; if admitted, a 3-member inquiry committee is constituted. F. Inquiry & Due Process Safeguards Committee comprises: CJI or Supreme Court Judge, Chief Justice of a High Court, Distinguished jurist. Charges must be formally framed and communicated to CEC. CEC entitled to reasonable opportunity of defence, reflecting doctrine of natural justice. If incapacity alleged, medical board examination mandated. G. Removal of Other Election Commissioners Other ECs removable by President on advice of CEC, ensuring internal institutional balance. In Vineet Narain v. Union of India (1997), SC held CEC cannot act arbitrarily or suo motu in such advice. Balances executive authority with collegial decision-making within Commission. H. Multi-Member Commission Structure EC made permanently multi-member on 1 October 1993. Validated by Supreme Court in T.N. Seshan v. Union of India (1995). Under Article 324(3), CEC acts as Chairman in multi-member body. Collegial structure ensures decisions are consensus-based rather than unilateral. I. Electoral Roll Controversy & SIR Allegations that Special Intensive Revision (SIR) led to deletion of approximately 65 lakh names in Bihar. Critics argue deletions may disproportionately affect minorities and opposition-supporting voters. EC maintains revisions are routine exercises under Representation of the People Act, 1950. Matter sub judice before Supreme Court, reflecting judicial oversight mechanism. K. Structural Strengths of EC Independence Constitutional status under Part XV of Constitution. Removal procedure mirrors that of Supreme Court judges. Fixed tenure and protected service conditions. Judicial review available against EC actions. Institutional legacy of assertive CECs (e.g., post-1990 electoral reforms era). L. Areas of Ongoing Debate Composition of selection committee under 2023 Act. Transparency in electoral roll revisions. Balance between executive role and institutional autonomy. Need for greater procedural clarity in large-scale voter deletions. M. Way Forward  Consider evolving towards a bipartisan or constitutionally entrenched appointment mechanism. Enhance transparency in electoral roll revision data and audit processes. Strengthen technological safeguards for voter database integrity. Institutionalise parliamentary consultations without undermining EC autonomy. Preserve balance between state authority and citizen liberty, consistent with Basic Structure doctrine. N. Prelims Pointers Article 324 – Powers of Election Commission. Article 326 – Adult suffrage. Anoop Baranwal (2023) – Interim selection committee ruling. T.N. Seshan (1995) – Validated multi-member EC. Removal of CEC similar to Supreme Court judge removal process. Practice Question Examine the constitutional safeguards that ensure the independence of the Election Commission of India. Are recent developments likely to affect its autonomy? (15M) C. Rajagopalachari (Rajaji)  A. Why in News? President unveiled bust of C. Rajagopalachari at Rashtrapati Bhavan (2026), marking symbolic effort to shed “colonial mindset” in national institutions. Bust installed at Grand Staircase, replacing statue of Edwin Lutyens, architect of New Delhi. Event framed within larger narrative of decolonisation of public spaces and institutions. Rajaji highlighted as only Indian Governor-General (1948–1950) of independent India. Relevance : GS Paper I Modern Indian History Freedom Movement (Vedaranyam Satyagraha) GS Paper II Constitutional transition (Governor-General role) Early post-independence politics B. Who Was Rajaji?  1. Early Life & Background Full name: Chakravarti Rajagopalachari (1878–1972). Born in Thorapalli, Tamil Nadu. Profession: Lawyer, freedom fighter, administrator, statesman. Close associate of Mahatma Gandhi; part of Congress inner circle. 2. Role in Freedom Movement Participated in Non-Cooperation Movement (1920) and Civil Disobedience Movement (1930). Led Vedaranyam Salt Satyagraha (1930) in Tamil Nadu, parallel to Dandi March. Imprisoned multiple times during freedom struggle. Advocated constitutionalism and gradual reform. 3. Administrative & Constitutional Roles Premier of Madras Presidency (1937–39) under Government of India Act, 1935. Governor of West Bengal (1947–48). Became last Governor-General of India (1948–1950) after Lord Mountbatten. Only Indian to hold that office before abolition under Constitution (1950). 4. Role in Post-Independence Politics Served as Home Minister of India (1951). Chief Minister of Madras State (1952–54). Introduced controversial “Modified Education Scheme” (Hereditary Education Policy). Advocated fiscal prudence and administrative efficiency. 5. Founder of Swatantra Party (1959) Founded Swatantra Party opposing Congress’ socialist economic model. Criticised Nehruvian planning and Licence-Permit-Quota Raj. Advocated: Free markets. Minimal state intervention. Civil liberties. Decentralisation. Swatantra Party became largest Opposition party in Lok Sabha (1967). 6. Ideational Contributions Advocated “mental decolonisation” and civilisational self-confidence. Translated and popularised Ramayana and Mahabharata in English and Tamil. Wrote extensively on ethics, governance and dharma. Strong believer in moral politics and Gandhian restraint. 7. Views on Partition & Politics Proposed CR Formula (1944) attempting compromise between Congress and Muslim League. Supported pragmatic negotiation to avoid prolonged conflict. Often seen as realist within Congress leadership. 8. Recognition & Legacy Awarded Bharat Ratna (1954) – among first recipients. Remembered as: Scholar-administrator. Liberal conservative thinker. Early advocate of economic liberalisation. C. Constitutional & Political Significance 1. Governor-General Role Oversaw transition from Dominion to Republic (1950). Ensured smooth constitutional continuity before office abolished under Constitution. Symbolised Indianisation of colonial institutions. 2. Economic Thought – Ahead of Time Opposed excessive state control during Nehru era. Advocated market reforms decades before 1991 Liberalisation. Critiqued command economy and centralised planning. 3. Federalism & Decentralisation Supported strong states within Union framework. Favoured local governance and minimal bureaucratic expansion. Ideological precursor to later fiscal federalism debates. D. Contemporary Relevance 1. Decolonisation Narrative Replacement of Lutyens’ statue with Rajaji’sbust symbolises: Indianisation of public memory. Reclaiming post-colonial institutional spaces. 2. Liberal Economic Legacy His advocacy of free markets resonates with: Post-1991 economic reforms. Contemporary entrepreneurship-driven growth model. G. Prelims Pointers Rajaji was only Indian Governor-General. Founder of Swatantra Party (1959). Led Vedaranyam Salt Satyagraha (1930). Recipient of Bharat Ratna (1954). Served as Premier of Madras Presidency (1937). H. Practice Question Discuss the political and intellectual contributions of C. Rajagopalachari in shaping post-independence India. (15M) India as a Major Contributor to Global Pesticide Toxicity A. Why in News? A recent Science journal (2024–25) study calculated Total Applied Toxicity (TAT) across 600+ pesticides in 65 countries (2013–2019). China, Brazil, U.S., and India together account for nearly 70% of global TAT, indicating concentration of ecological risk. Despite Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (2022) pledge to reduce pesticide risk by 50% by 2030, toxicity levels are rising. India’s pesticide regime under Insecticides Act, 1968 criticised as outdated amid expansion of non-agricultural pesticide uses. Relevance GS Paper III Environmental degradation Biodiversity loss Agriculture & sustainable farming Chemical pollution B. Understanding Total Applied Toxicity (TAT) TAT measures risk-weighted toxicity, not just volume of pesticide use. Calculation combines: Quantity applied. Chemical lethality. Toxicity to non-target organisms. Focus extends beyond pests to pollinators, soil organisms, fish, terrestrial arthropods, vertebrates and aquatic plants. Provides ecological risk perspective rather than simple tonnage comparison. C. India’s Position in Global Context India among top four contributors, together accounting for ~70% of global pesticide toxicity burden. Major crops driving pesticide use: Rice, Maize, Soybean, Fruits and vegetables, Cereals. Toxicity levels increased in India during 2013–2019 period. India uses at least 66 pesticides banned in several other countries. D. Ecological Impacts Identified Most affected organisms: Terrestrial arthropods (including pollinators). Soil organisms. Freshwater fish. Pollinator decline directly threatens food security and biodiversity stability. Soil toxicity undermines long-term agricultural productivity. Aquatic contamination impacts drinking water and fisheries. E. Human Health Dimension Pesticide residues increasingly found in: Stored grains, Domestic settings, Public spaces. Chronic exposure linked to: Neurological disorders. Endocrine disruption. Cancer risks (as per global epidemiological studies). Expanding “ordinary use” beyond agriculture includes paints, furniture treatments, fumigation. F. Legal & Regulatory Framework Insecticides Act, 1968 regulates manufacture, sale and agricultural use. Act largely focused on farm-level application; limited regulation of household and urban use. Criticism that Act does not adequately incorporate: Environmental liability. Long-term ecological monitoring. Cumulative toxicity risk assessment. Proposed Pesticides Management Bill, 2025 aims to: Promote safer alternatives. Encourage biological and traditional knowledge-based inputs. G. Policy & Governance Challenges Fragmented monitoring of pesticide residues across States. Limited real-time data on pesticide usage by active ingredient. Weak enforcement of safe handling norms among smallholder farmers. Subsidy-driven input model rooted in Green Revolution paradigm. Climate change increasing pest incidence, raising pesticide dependency. H. International Commitments India is party to: Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. Rotterdam Convention on Prior Informed Consent. 2022 CBD pact commits countries to reduce pesticide risk by 50% by 2030. Current trends suggest India not on track for this reduction target. I. Structural Drivers High population pressure and food security concerns. Small landholdings and risk-averse farmer behaviour. Aggressive agrochemical marketing. Limited adoption of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) at scale. Inadequate transition incentives for organic or natural farming. J. Critical Evaluation Strengths India’s pesticide use per hectare remains lower than some developed countries in volume terms. Increasing policy attention toward biological pesticides and nano-formulations. Growing expansion of natural farming initiatives (e.g., Andhra Pradesh model). Concerns Toxicity risk rising despite moderate volume growth. Continued approval of chemicals banned in OECD jurisdictions. Weak liability framework for environmental damage. Monitoring largely reactive rather than preventive. K. Way Forward Shift from input-intensive to agro-ecological farming models. Mandate annual public disclosure of pesticide use by active ingredient. Strengthen Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and bio-control adoption. Introduce polluter liability and compensation mechanisms. Align domestic regulation with global best practices. Invest in farmer training on safe handling and dosage. L. Prelims Pointers TAT = Total Applied Toxicity, measures ecological risk-weighted pesticide exposure. Insecticides Act, 1968 currently governs pesticide regulation. CBD 2022 target: 50% pesticide risk reduction by 2030. Major non-target species affected include arthropods, soil organisms and fish. M. Practice Question Critically examine India’s pesticide regulatory framework in light of rising ecological toxicity. (15M) India & International Energy Agency (IEA)  A. Why in News? At the IEA Ministerial Meeting (Paris, Feb 2026), progress discussed on India’s long-pending request for full membership. India currently holds association status (since 2017) but lacks voting rights in decision-making. Full membership requires amendment of IEA founding charter, currently limited to OECD members. Debate gains relevance amid global energy transition and geopolitical supply shocks post-Ukraine war. Relevance GS Paper II International relations Global energy governance Reform of multilateral institutions GS Paper III Energy security Strategic petroleum reserves Clean energy transition B. About the International Energy Agency (IEA) Established in 1974 after the 1973 oil crisis, triggered by Arab oil embargo. Objective: Ensure collective energy security, stable oil supplies and emergency response coordination. Operates under framework of OECD. Members must maintain 90 days of net oil import reserves. Currently comprises 32 OECD countries. C. India’s Current Status India became IEA Associate Member in 2017. Associates participate in: Policy discussions, Data sharing, Energy outlook collaboration. However, associates do not possess voting rights. India accounts for nearly 6% of global energy demand and is fastest-growing major energy consumer. D. Why India Seeks Full Membership ? To gain decision-making role in global energy governance. To influence policies on: Energy security. Critical minerals. Clean energy transitions. India’s energy demand expected to grow by 25% by 2040 (IEA projections). Ensures voice of Global South in traditionally OECD-centric institution. E. Structural Barrier – OECD Link IEA charter restricts membership to OECD countries. India is not an OECD member. Granting India membership requires: Amendment of IEA’s legal framework, or Relaxation of OECD linkage condition. Brazil (non-OECD) has also expressed interest. F. Energy Geopolitics Context Post-2022 Ukraine crisis exposed vulnerabilities in energy supply chains. IEA coordinated emergency oil stock releases during 1991 Gulf War and 2022 Ukraine invasion. Energy governance increasingly linked with: Climate change commitments. Critical mineral supply chains. Green hydrogen markets. India’s role significant as: 3rd largest oil importer. Major coal consumer. Rapid renewable capacity expansion. G. Strategic Implications Inclusion of India would reflect shift from OECD-centric energy governance to multipolar architecture. Strengthens global cooperation on: Energy transition finance. Data transparency. Emergency preparedness. Aligns with India’s growing influence in G20 and climate diplomacy. H. Challenges OECD members may resist dilution of charter norms. Oil reserve requirement may strain India’s fiscal capacity. Balancing fossil fuel security with net-zero commitments. Geopolitical sensitivities involving China (also associate, not member). I. India’s Energy Transition Profile Installed renewable capacity exceeds 180 GW (solar + wind combined). Target: 500 GW non-fossil capacity by 2030. Committed to Net-zero by 2070. Advocates lifestyle changes through LiFE (Lifestyle for Environment) initiative. J. Broader Institutional Debate Reflects larger trend of reforming post-1970s institutions. Similar debates ongoing in: WTO reform. UNSC expansion. Multilateral development banks. Question: Should global institutions reflect current energy demand realities? K. Way Forward Gradual reform of IEA charter to allow non-OECD membership. Creation of tiered voting structures reflecting energy demand weightage. Strengthening India–IEA technical collaboration in: Critical minerals mapping. Energy efficiency. Clean cooking transition. Ensure compliance with oil stock norms through strategic petroleum reserves expansion. L. Prelims Pointers IEA established in 1974 after oil crisis. Members must hold 90 days oil reserves. Operates under OECD framework. India became Associate Member in 2017. M. Practice Mains Questions Examine whether global energy governance institutions need structural reforms to reflect emerging economies. (15M) Organ Donation in India – Deceased Donor Challenge Analysis A. Why in News? In Mann Ki Baat (Feb 2026), Prime Minister highlighted need to expand organ donation awareness, noting rising transplant numbers yet persistent donor shortages. India recorded 18,911 total transplants in 2024, highest ever, but deceased donor numbers remain disproportionately low. Deceased organ transplants rose from 9,401 (2023) to 9,410 (2024), yet living donations dominate transplant ecosystem. Data sourced from National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organisation (NOTTO). Relevance : GS Paper II Public health policy Governance of medical institutions GS Paper III Health infrastructure gaps Insurance & Ayushman Bharat B. Current Organ Transplant Data (2024) Total transplants: 18,911 (2024) vs 18,378 (2023). Living donor transplants: 15,505 (2024). Deceased donor transplants: 3,406 (2024). Kidney transplants: 13,476 (largest share). Liver transplants: 4,901. Heart transplants: 253; Lung: 228. Pancreas and small bowel remain rare. C. Structural Gap – Deceased vs Living Donation India’s deceased donor rate is approximately 0.77 per million population (pmp). Comparatively: Spain: ~48 pmp. U.S.: ~26 pmp. China: ~6 pmp. Living donors account for nearly 80% of transplants, creating medical and ethical stress. Deceased donor ecosystem underdeveloped relative to global standards. D. Demand–Supply Imbalance Estimated 1.75–2 lakh kidney failure cases annually, but only ~13,000 transplants performed. Approximately 50,000 patients need heart transplants annually, yet only 253 performed. Liver transplant demand estimated at 25,000–30,000 annually, but ~5,000 conducted. Indicates massive unmet need in critical care. E. Legal & Institutional Framework Governed by Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act (THOTA), 1994, amended 2011. Establishes brain-death certification norms. NOTTO functions as apex national body for organ allocation and coordination. Online national registry introduced for transparent allocation. F. Geographic & Institutional Disparity States like Tamil Nadu, Telangana, Maharashtra show relatively better deceased donation rates. Northern and eastern States lag significantly. Urban tertiary hospitals dominate transplant infrastructure. Rural access to transplant facilities remains limited. G. Social & Cultural Factors Lack of awareness about brain death concept. Religious misconceptions about post-death donation. Family refusal rates remain high. Emotional distress at time of consent reduces conversion rates. H. Ethical & Governance Issues Risk of commercialisation in living donations. Need for strict monitoring against organ trafficking. Transparent allocation mechanisms crucial to maintain public trust. Balancing urgency, equity and medical compatibility in allocation. I. Global Best Practices Spain’s “opt-out” system and transplant coordinators model. Dedicated ICU-based organ retrieval protocols. Public campaigns normalising donation culture. Integrated national transplant registries with real-time tracking. J. Recent Reforms & Initiatives Government removed domicile requirement for organ registration. Introduced common national waiting list. Digital portal integration to improve allocation transparency. Public awareness drives via Mann Ki Baat and media campaigns. K. Key Challenges Low deceased donor conversion rate. Limited ICU infrastructure for brain-death certification. Inadequate trained transplant coordinators. Logistical challenges in organ transport (green corridors uneven). Financial burden of transplant procedures. L. Way Forward Institutionalise hospital-based transplant coordinators nationwide. Strengthen ICU infrastructure in district hospitals. Consider debate on presumed consent (opt-out) with safeguards. Enhance public awareness through sustained campaigns. Expand green corridor logistics network. Increase insurance coverage under Ayushman Bharat for transplant procedures. M. Prelims Pointers NOTTO = National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organisation. THOTA enacted in 1994, amended 2011. Brain death legally recognised for organ retrieval. Deceased donor rate in India ~0.77 pmp. N. Practice Question Examine the structural challenges in expanding deceased organ donation in India. (15M) National Monetisation Pipeline (NMP) 2.0 A. Why in News? Finance Minister announced that NMP 2.0 (FY26–FY30) aims to mobilise ₹16.72 lakh crore, exceeding the ₹10 lakh crore target in Union Budget 2025–26. NMP 1.0 (FY22–FY25) reportedly achieved annual targets, with monetisation proceeds peaking around ₹3.87 lakh crore (FY22). Second phase aligns with Asset Monetisation Plan 2025–30, expanding scope to logistics parks, ropeways, warehouses and digital infrastructure. Policy intended to unlock value from brownfield public assets, not new asset privatisation. Relevance : GS Paper III Infrastructure financing PPP models Fiscal policy & FRBM Logistics competitiveness GS Paper II Governance reforms Public asset management B. Conceptual Framework – What is NMP? Launched in 2021, NMP aims to monetise operational public assets to fund fresh infrastructure creation. Monetisation differs from privatisation: Ownership remains with government. Private sector operates assets for fixed tenure under PPP contracts. Anchored in National Infrastructure Pipeline (NIP) vision. Implemented via concession models like Toll-Operate-Transfer (TOT). C. Performance of NMP 1.0 (FY22–FY25) Total targeted mobilisation: ₹6 lakh crore. Annual realisation ranged between ₹1.4–3.8 lakh crore. Major contributors: National Highways Authority of India (NHAI). Power Grid Corporation. Railways freight corridors. Monetisation through: Asset leasing. Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvITs). PPP concessions. D. NMP 2.0 – Sectoral Focus (FY26–FY30) Highways: ~₹2.77 lakh crore. Railways: ~₹2.62 lakh crore. Power: ~₹2.77 lakh crore. Oil & gas pipelines: ~₹1.54 lakh crore. Warehousing & storage: ~₹1.8 lakh crore. Telecom: ~₹4.8 lakh crore (largest component). Airports, ports, ropeways and tourism assets included. E. PPP & Financial Instruments Monetisation via: Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvITs). Public-Private Partnerships (PPP). Direct asset leasing. NHAI’s TOT model auctions operational highways. BSNL tower monetisation part of telecom asset strategy. Assets remain government-owned; private players gain operational rights. F. Economic Rationale Helps bridge infrastructure funding gap estimated under NIP (~₹100+ lakh crore). Frees up public capital for greenfield projects. Reduces fiscal pressure and public debt burden. Encourages long-term institutional investors like pension and sovereign wealth funds. Enhances asset efficiency and service quality via private management. G. Governance & Fiscal Context Proceeds credited mainly to: Consolidated Fund of India. Or respective ministry allocations. Asset monetisation mandated under FRBM discipline and capital expenditure push. Aligns with government’s emphasis on capital expenditure multiplier effect. H. Key Concerns & Criticisms Risk of underpricing strategic public assets. Potential tariff hikes affecting users (e.g., highway tolls). Limited domestic long-term institutional investor base. PPP models historically faced issues of contract renegotiation and litigation. Revenue projections sensitive to economic cycles. I. Strategic Significance Promotes infrastructure-led growth model. Supports logistics efficiency, reducing India’s logistics cost (~13–14% of GDP). Enhances competitiveness under PM Gati Shakti National Master Plan. Enables development of multi-modal logistics parks and ropeways in hilly regions. J. Ropeways & Logistics Parks – Emerging Assets Ropeways align with National Ropeways Development Programme (Parvatmala). Logistics parks support: Multi-modal integration. Warehousing modernisation. Supply chain resilience. Critical for achieving India’s manufacturing and export ambitions. K. Way Forward Strengthen transparent asset valuation mechanisms. Improve contract design to minimise renegotiation risk. Develop domestic infrastructure bond markets. Expand role of InvITs and REITs. Ensure user interest protection through regulatory oversight. L. Prelims Pointers NMP launched in 2021. Monetisation ≠ privatisation. TOT = Toll-Operate-Transfer model. InvITs allow pooled investment in infrastructure assets. NMP 2.0 target: ₹16.72 lakh crore (FY26–FY30). M. Practice Question Evaluate the role of the National Monetisation Pipeline in financing India’s infrastructure ambitions. (15M)