Content:
- Vande Bharat trains have weak defences against even cattle, says new safety report
- U.S. visas issued to Indian students decline by 30%
- Diving into SC’s verdict on Governors
- India, EU can collaborate on space policy, says envoy
- Two cheetahs move to new home in Madhya Pradesh
- Scientists find green way to recycle toxic perovskite solar cells
Vande Bharat trains have weak defences against even cattle, says new safety report
Context : The Vande Bharat Express, India’s flagship semi-high-speed train under the ‘Make in India’ initiative, has been hailed for its speed and comfort. However, a recent safety report has raised concerns about its vulnerability to accidents, especially during cattle run-overs.
Relevance : GS 3 (Infrastructure)
Key Safety Concerns Highlighted in the Report
- Vulnerability to Collisions:
- The leading coach of Vande Bharat is significantly lighter than a traditional locomotive.
- At high speeds (160 kmph), even a minor obstruction or cattle run–over can lead to serious accidents.
- Design Limitations:
- Unlike conventional trains with heavy locomotives at the front, Vande Bharat has a distributed power configuration (trainset model).
- This leads to less impact resistance in case of frontal collisions.
- High-Speed Risks:
- Current track infrastructure and absence of robust fencing expose trains to frequent trespassing and cattle intrusion, especially in rural stretches.
Recommendations by the Safety Report
- Physical Infrastructure:
- Sturdy fencing must be installed along routes where Vande Bharat operates at high speeds to prevent cattle and human trespass.
- Level crossings must be eliminated and replaced with overpasses or underpasses (especially on 160 kmph corridors).
- Trespass Management:
- Railways must identify high-risk zones prone to cattle and human movement.
- Implement subways, patrolling, and deployment of RPF (Railway Protection Force) at such points.
Counterview by ICF Engineer (Shubhranshu)
- Front-End Design Justification:
- The nose cone is designed to crumple, absorbing impact energy to minimize damage.
- A cattle guard/scoop is installed to deflect obstructions on tracks.
- Weight Argument:
- The lighter design is intentional and standard in EMUs/MEMUs globally, and is not inherently unsafe.
- Distributed propulsion allows better acceleration and energy efficiency.
- Comparative Design Philosophy:
- Worldwide, modern trainsets do not rely on heavy locomotives and yet operate safely under strict corridor protection.
Structural & Operational Gaps
- Speed vs. Safety Infrastructure Mismatch:
- India is running high-speed trains on semi-modernized tracks without adequate fencing or full-grade separation.
- Under-prepared Ecosystem:
- Rapid rollout of Vande Bharat trains (136 services as of Dec 2024) is not matched with supporting safety upgrades in tracks, crossings, and patrols.
Wider Implications
- Public Safety Risk:
- Frequent nose damage and accidents due to cattle hit have already been reported — raising questions on readiness for full-speed operations.
- ‘Make in India’ Under Scrutiny:
- While a major success story, the sustainability and safety of the Vande Bharat model may come under criticism if systemic support is lacking.
Way Forward
- Comprehensive Corridors:
- Treat Vande Bharat corridors akin to dedicated freight or bullet train tracks with strict access control.
- Upgrade Safety Protocols:
- Integrate thermal cameras, animal sensors, geo-fencing, and real-time alerts into train operation systems.
- Policy-Level Interventions:
- Ensure inter-ministerial coordination between Railways, Environment (for cattle protection), and State authorities to manage encroachment and rural interface.
U.S. visas issued to Indian students decline by 30%
Context : In February 2025, the U.S. issued 30% fewer student visas to Indians compared to the same month in 2024 — the sharpest decline among top source countries. This comes amid rising visa denials and terminations affecting international students, especially from India.
Relevance : GS 2(International Relations)
- 30% Decline for Indian Students:
- In February 2025, F-1 visas issued to Indian students fell from 590 (2024) to 411, marking a 30% drop.
- This is the steepest drop among the top four countries sending students to the U.S.
- Global Context:
- Overall student visas (F-1) dropped by only 4.75%.
- Visa Wait Times Disparity:
- Indian students face longest wait times — 58 days in Delhi.

Concerning Trends
- Unprecedented Visa Terminations:
- Over 1,100 students, including many Indians, had visas revoked without clear reasons.
- Reported in 170+ colleges across the U.S.
- Legal challenges filed, e.g., by Manikanta Pasula and Chinmay Deore.
- Indian Govt’s Shift in Stance:
- Initially urged students to “follow the law.”
- Now offering legal support and advising pursuit of legal remedies.
Wider Structural Issues
- High Rejection Rates Post-COVID:
- Post-pandemic visa surge led to rising denials.
- 2024 F-1 visa denial rate: 41%
- All other visa denial rate: 22.1%
- Sharp divergence in rejection rates compared to pre-COVID years.
- Long-Term Visa Denial Data:
- From 2013 to 2021: denial rates for F-1 and other visas were comparable.
- From 2022–24: growing gap; over 500,000 students denied visas in just two years.
India-Specific Implications
- Impact on Global Education Mobility:
- India is a major source of international students — this trend threatens educational aspirations.
- Could shift preference toward Canada, Australia, Europe.
- Brain Drain & Soft Power:
- Reduced access to U.S. education could affect India’s tech workforce pipeline and diaspora diplomacy.
- Economic Consequences:
- Indian students contribute significantly to U.S. universities’ revenue.
- A sharp drop could prompt a revaluation of bilateral education policies.
Geopolitical Angle
- Possible Impact of Trump’s Return:
- The sharp drop coincides with Trump’s second term beginning.
- Suggests early signs of tighter immigration control or protectionist policy resurgence.
Diving into SC’s verdict on Governors
Background of the Case
- The Tamil Nadu Governor delayed action on 10 Bills passed by the State Legislative Assembly.
- He neither assented, returned, nor referred them to the President — effectively exercising a pocket veto (not envisaged in the Constitution).
- Upon the Supreme Court’s push, the Governor returned the Bills, and later referred them to the President after reconsideration.
Relevance : GS 2(Polity, Governance)
Key Issues Before the Supreme Court
- Can a Governor indefinitely delay assent on State Bills?
- Can a Governor return a Bill and then refer it to the President?
- What happens when constitutional silences are misused to delay democratic processes?
Supreme Court’s Core Observations
- Pocket Veto is Unconstitutional: The Constitution doesn’t allow indefinite inaction by a Governor.
- Sequence of Actions Invalid: Returning a Bill and referring it to the President isn’t allowed — it must be either/or, not both.
- Federalism Must Be Respected: The will of the State legislature — as an elected body — must be respected unless there is a constitutional reason to override it.
- President’s Role Limited: Assent can be withheld only for constitutionally valid reasons (e.g., conflict with Union law).
Prescribing Timelines (Controversial Move)
- The court laid down specific timelines for Governors and the President to act on Bills — despite the Constitution being silent on this.
- This was done to ensure no abuse of power through indefinite delays.
- Critics argue this is judicial overreach — creating new norms that ideally should be the Legislature’s domain.
Use of Article 142 – “Complete Justice”
- Supreme Court invoked Article 142 to deem the Bills as passed and thus enforceable as law.
- Tamil Nadu promptly notified and enforced the Acts the next day.
- Critics argue this bypassed the legislative process; defenders say it was the only recourse to uphold constitutional morality.
The Tension:
- The tension between a nominated Governor and elected State government is structurally embedded and unresolved.
Federalism and Democratic Principles
- The judgment reasserts the importance of:
- Cooperative Federalism — the Centre-State balance must be preserved.
- Legislative Sovereignty of States — elected Assemblies must not be undermined by unelected functionaries.
- Time-bound Governance — Constitutional processes cannot be stalled indefinitely.
Criticism & Concerns
- Judicial Overreach? Prescribing timelines and deeming Bills passed are arguably legislative functions.
- Sustainability Issues: Ad hoc judicial fixes can’t substitute for long-term institutional reforms.
- Potential Precedent: Will courts now routinely intervene in State-Governor stand-offs?
Verdict as a Temporary Fix
- Seen as a “band-aid” solution to deeper systemic flaws in India’s federal structure.
- Reinforces the urgent need for reform:
- Revisit the role of Governors.
- Introduce codified procedures and time limits in constitutional processes.
- Rebalance centralising features of the 1949 Constitution with modern federal realities.
Way Forward
- Legislative Reform: Codify timelines for gubernatorial and presidential assent.
- Rethink Governor’s Role: Time to reassess the utility and powers of the Governor in a matured democracy.
- Strengthen Federal Norms: Institutional mechanisms to resolve Centre-State frictions without judicial dependence.
India, EU can collaborate on space policy, says envoy
Strategic Context
- India-EU Space Dialogue: A formal “space dialogue” is being proposed as a first step to deepen bilateral collaboration.
- Broader Strategic Framework: This aligns with the growing India–EU strategic partnership, including tech, trade, and defense.
Relevance : GS 2(International Relations)
Key Security Concerns in Outer Space
- ASAT Debris Generation:
- The envoy emphasized the global concern over debris from destructive Anti-Satellite (ASAT) weapons tests.
- India’s 2019 ASAT test was referenced — a direct “hit-to-kill” test at ~300 km Low Earth Orbit (LEO).
- EU’s Stand: Supports ban on destructive ASAT testing in the UN context.
- RPO (Rendezvous and Proximity Operations):
- Defined as one satellite maneuvering near another, potentially for docking or inspection.
- Concerns: When done without prior notification or by adversarial actors, RPOs pose a threat to satellite safety.
- EU’s View: RPOs aren’t inherently dangerous, but need internationally agreed norms to prevent misuse.
- Cybersecurity Threats:
- Jamming and spoofing of satellite signals threaten critical services (navigation, communication, etc.).
- Emphasis on the need for space cyber-resilience.
Regulatory Collaboration
- Norms for Responsible Behaviour:
- India and EU can collaborate in shaping global norms, rules, and principles of responsible conduct in outer space.
- Need for rules-based order in space, akin to maritime/airspace norms.
- Space Situational Awareness (SSA):
- Shared concern on tracking and managing space debris and unauthorized satellite proximity.
- EU Space Act (Upcoming):
- Focus: EU internal coordination for competitiveness in the space sector.
- Objective: Avoid fragmentation across 27 EU nations; does not aim to regulate third countries like India.
Opportunities for India
- Norm Shaping:
- As a major space power, India can play a leading role in global governance frameworks on space security.
- Chance to align with democratic and responsible space-faring nations.
- Civil and Dual-Use Tech Cooperation:
- Joint work on non-military space missions, earth observation, climate change monitoring, satellite-based services.
- Potential for collaboration on emerging techs like small satellites, launch vehicles, and data analytics.
India’s Strategic Balancing
- Maintaining Strategic Autonomy:
- India must carefully balance its ASAT capabilities and national security goals while engaging with multilateral efforts.
- Can push for differentiation between destructive and non-destructive technologies in space diplomacy.
- Engagement Without Compromise:
- Participation in rule-setting doesn’t mean curtailing sovereign capabilities.
- Opportunity to prevent regulatory capture by space superpowers.
Two cheetahs move to new home in Madhya Pradesh
Event Overview
- Two male cheetahs, Prabhas and Pawak, were relocated to Gandhi Sagar Wildlife Sanctuary (GSWS), Madhya Pradesh.
- Both are six-year-old males, part of the February 2023 batch from South Africa under Project Cheetah.
Relevance : GS 3(Environment and Ecology)
Significance of the Gandhi Sagar Relocation
- GSWS becomes the second cheetah reintroduction site in Madhya Pradesh, after Kuno National Park.
- A 64-sq. km enclosure has been prepared, located between Mandsaur and Neemuch districts.
- The Chambal River bisects the sanctuary, influencing habitat dynamics.
Project Cheetah: Objectives & Milestones
- First translocation: 8 cheetahs from Namibia in September 2022 to Kuno.
- Second translocation: 12 cheetahs from South Africa in February 2023.
- Objective: Reintroduce the extinct Asiatic cheetah in India, improve biodiversity, and develop eco-tourism.
Reintroduction Strategy
- Cheetahs are being moved to additional locations to:
- Reduce pressure on Kuno National Park.
- Avoid territorial conflict and overcrowding.
- Expand the geographic gene pool and increase survival chances.
- Four more cheetahs from Botswana expected in May 2025, and four more later in Phase II.
Success Indicators
- MP Governments claimed that Kuno had the highest number of cheetah births globally post-translocation.
- Encouraging sign that adaptation and breeding are possible in Indian conditions.
- Increased prey base at GSWS over the last year supports sustainability.
Operational Details
- A 20-member team led by Kuno’s CCF Uttam Kumar Sharma managed the relocation by road (~250 km).
- Kuno now houses 24 cheetahs:
- Gandhi Sagar staff trained at Kuno will now manage the relocated cheetahs after a 7-day handover phase.
Ecological and Governance Implications
- Project Cheetah is a flagship intercontinental conservation program.
- Promotes habitat development, prey augmentation, and wildlife management.
- Indicates state-level leadership and commitment to long-term wildlife conservation goals.
Scientists find green way to recycle toxic perovskite solar cells
Background on Perovskite Solar Cells
- Perovskite PVs are a promising alternative to silicon-based solar panels due to:
- High efficiency in converting sunlight to electricity.
- Challenges:
- Have a shorter lifespan than silicon cells.
- Previous recycling methods relied on toxic organic solvents (e.g., dimethylformamide), posing environmental risks.
Relevance : GS 3(Science and Technology)
New Breakthrough: Water-Based Green Recycling Method
- Published in Nature, the study demonstrates:
- A water-based solution for recycling perovskite layers.
- Achieves almost same efficiency as fresh materials, even after 5 recycling cycles.
- ~99% recovery of the solar cell layers after multiple rounds.
Key Components of the New Recycling Process
- Sodium Acetate:
- Binds with lead ions → forms water-soluble lead acetate.
- Facilitates efficient dissolution of lead-based perovskite in water.
- Sodium Iodide:
- Supplies iodide ions to restore degraded perovskite crystals.
- Supports reformation of high-quality crystals during cooling.
- Hypophosphorous Acid:
- Acts as a stabiliser to keep the water-based solution viable for multiple reuse cycles.
Recycling of Entire Solar Cell
- Used ethanol and ethyl acetate to dissolve and recover other cell layers.
- Successfully reassembled solar cells layer-by-layer with minimal loss.
- Achieved comparable efficiency to virgin cells, even after 5 reuse cycles.
Significance & Environmental Impact
- Addresses twomajor problems:
- Waste generation from short-lived solar cells.
- Promotes circular economy: keeping materials in use longer, reducing waste and emissions.
- Avoids toxic organic solvents, aligning with green chemistry principles.
- Supports low-cost, high-efficiency solar tech with significantly reduced lifecycle environmental burden.
Future Implications
- If scalable, it could:
- Solve critical barriers to commercialisation of perovskite PVs.
- Reduce environmental footprint of solar power generation.
- Need for life cycle assessment (LCA):
- Evaluate overall environmental impact across production, use, and disposal phases.
- Ensure no unintended ecological consequences.
Expert Commentary
- Researchers laud the breakthrough as a holistic shift from just lead recovery to full cell regeneration.
- It represents a mature approach to sustainability in renewable tech.
- Could pave the way for perovskite PVs to fulfill their promise as a key player in future clean energy systems