Content

1. Uttarakhand’s Proposed ‘Green Cess’ on Outstation Vehicles.
2. The ‘Dunki Route’ and the Dark Side of Irregular Migration
3. IUCN World Heritage Outlook 4
4. 22nd India–ASEAN Summit (Kuala Lumpur, 2025)
5. Municipal Bonds Now Eligible for Repo and Reverse Repo Deals

---

Uttarakhand’s Proposed ‘Green Cess’ on Outstation Vehicles

---

Why in News

• The Government of Uttarakhand plans to introduce a “Green Cess” on vehicles entering from outside the state.
• Aim: Combat rising vehicular pollution, fund green infrastructure, and improve air quality in ecologically sensitive hill regions.
• Estimated annual revenue: ₹100 crore, to be managed by the Uttarakhand Pollution Control Board (UKPCB).

Relevance

• GS-3 (Environment, Conservation & Pollution Control): Fiscal instruments for sustainability, vehicular pollution mitigation.
• GS-2 (Governance): Policy design, fiscal decentralization, environmental regulation.
• GS-1 (Geography): Himalayan ecology and environmental vulnerabilities.
• GS-3 (Economy): Green budgeting and fiscal federalism.

Background and Context

• Uttarakhand witnesses massive tourist inflow — over 5 crore visitors (2022–24) — leading to traffic congestion, dust pollution, and ecosystem stress.
• Vehicular emissions and road dust contribute to PM2.5 and PM10 pollution, especially in Dehradun, Nainital, Haridwar, Rishikesh.
• The state’s fragile Himalayan ecology is already under pressure due to urbanization, road-widening projects, and pilgrimage tourism (Char Dham, Kedarnath).
• Aligns with India’s larger goals of Net-Zero by 2070 and National Clean Air Programme (NCAP).

Key Features of the Green Cess

• Applicability: All vehicles registered outside Uttarakhand entering the state.
• Objective: Internalize environmental costs by applying the Polluter Pays Principle.
• Estimated Annual Collection: ~₹100 crore.
• Administering Body: Uttarakhand Pollution Control Board (UKPCB) under the State Environment Department.
• Revenue Utilization:
  • Air quality monitoring & sensor network expansion.
  • Dust suppression and road vacuuming projects.
  • Green infrastructure: Urban forests, EV charging stations, green corridors.
  • Public awareness & behavioural change campaigns.
  • Promotion of electric vehicles and clean mobility.

Economic & Environmental Rationale

• Environmental Fiscal Reform (EFR): Uses taxation to disincentivize pollution and generate revenue for mitigation.
• Tourism-linked Environmental Stress: Heavy influx of vehicles (especially diesel SUVs) from Delhi-NCR and UP.
• Polluter Pays Principle: Embeds the cost of environmental externalities within market mechanisms.
• Co-benefits:
  • Encourages public transport, shared cabs, EV adoption.
  • Reduces congestion and particulate emissions.
  • Creates dedicated green fund for continuous ecological improvement.

National Parallels (India)

State/City	Measure	Key Outcome
Delhi NCR	Environment Compensation Charge (ECC) on commercial vehicles	Reduced entry of old diesel trucks, improved AQI marginally
Himachal Pradesh	Green Fee on vehicles entering tourist towns (Manali, Shimla)	Finances solid waste and parking management
Goa	Entry Tax on out-of-state vehicles	Used for coastal zone management
Ladakh	Eco-tax on tourists and vehicles	Revenue for glacier and biodiversity conservation
Sikkim	Sustainable Tourism Fee	Funds trekking route maintenance and reforestation

Learning for Uttarakhand: Success depends on transparent fund utilization, earmarked green spending, and measurable pollution reduction.

Global Parallels

Country/City	Mechanism	Key Learning
London (UK)	Congestion Charge and Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ)	Reduced NO₂ levels by ~25%, boosted EV adoption
Singapore	Electronic Road Pricing (ERP)	Dynamic pricing curbs congestion, reinvested in mass transit
Norway	CO₂-based Vehicle Tax	Drastically increased EV share (over 80% new car sales)
Sweden	Carbon Tax (1991)	Shift from fossil fuels to renewables; model for EFR success
Bhutan	Sustainable Development Fee (SDF) on tourists	Controls inflow, funds environmental projects

Inference: Globally, eco-taxes serve dual goals — behavioral change + revenue for sustainability projects.

Administrative & Policy Dimensions

• Legal Backing: Can be notified under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, or through a State Finance Bill.
• Implementation Agencies:
  • Uttarakhand Transport Department (collection mechanism)
  • UKPCB (project financing and monitoring)
• Monitoring: Integration with FASTag or ANPR systems for automated cess collection.
• Transparency Measures:
  • Annual Green Cess Utilization Report.
  • Public dashboard for tracking revenue allocation.

Potential Challenges

• Administrative: Setting up collection points at multiple entry routes (Haridwar, Rampur, Rudrapur).
• Equity Concerns: Frequent visitors and commercial transporters may face high burden.
• Economic: Tourism operators fear deterrence to visitors, affecting livelihoods.
• Accountability: Ensuring cess funds are not diverted to non-environmental uses.
• Coordination: Requires alignment with central programs like NCAP and National Mission on Sustainable Habitat.

Long-Term Implications

• Positive:
  • Builds a sustainable fiscal base for environmental protection.
  • Encourages inter-state learning on green taxation.
  • Strengthens Uttarakhand’s case as an eco-conscious tourist destination.
• Risks:
  • If poorly implemented, may become a revenue tool rather than environmental reform.
  • Possible pushback from tourism sector without visible green outcomes.

Integration with Broader Policy Frameworks

• National:
  • NCAP (2019) – Targets 40% reduction in PM levels by 2026.
  • National Green Tribunal (NGT) directives on vehicular emissions.
  • FAME-II Scheme promoting EV adoption.
  • National Clean Energy Fund model for cross-sector green spending.
• International Commitments:
  • Paris Agreement & Glasgow Pact – internalizing carbon pricing.
  • SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities), SDG 13 (Climate Action), SDG 15 (Life on Land).

Way Forward

• Institutionalize a “Green Fund” with independent audit and citizen oversight.
• Differential Cess Design: Lower rate for EVs, higher for diesel and heavy vehicles.
• Tourist Management Policy: Seasonal caps, parking limits, shuttle-based last-mile connectivity.
• Green Infrastructure Priorities:
  • Urban forests in Mussoorie & Nainital.
  • Solar-powered public transport.
  • Dust-free road zones in pilgrimage circuits.
• Public Communication: Campaign linking tourism with ecological responsibility — “Clean Himalaya, Green Himalaya”.

---

‘Dunki Route’ and the Dark Side of Irregular Migration

---

Why in News

• On October 26, 2025, 50 men from Haryana (aged 25–40) were deported from the United States after being caught for illegal entry and stay via the “Dunki route.”
• They had paid hefty sums (₹25–60 lakh each) to human traffickers promising entry into the U.S. through Latin America.
• The deportation is part of a U.S. crackdown on irregular migrants, under which ~2,500 Indians have been deported since January 2023.

Relevance

• GS-2 (Governance, International Relations): Human trafficking, migration diplomacy, India–U.S. bilateral cooperation.
• GS-3 (Internal Security): Transnational crime, money laundering, illegal migration networks.
• GS-1 (Society): Rural distress, aspiration-driven migration, demographic pressures.

 What is the ‘Dunki Route’?

• The “Dunki route” refers to illegal backdoor migration routes used by Indians to reach Western countries—especially the U.S., Canada, and Europe.
• The route typically passes through South America (Brazil, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico) and involves crossing dangerous terrains to enter the U.S. illegally.
• The term “Dunki” (Punjabi slang) derives from “donkey” — implying an underground, risky, and unapproved method of travel.

Key Facts from the Current Incident

• Financial loss: Each migrant spent between ₹29–58 lakh, selling land or taking high-interest loans.
• Journey duration: 60–120 days via South America.
• Arrests: Many detained in Georgia and Texas, jailed for 10–14 months before deportation.
• Deportation logistics: Flights operated under U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) coordination.

National Scale of the Issue

• MEA data (Jan 2023–Oct 2025): ~2,500 Indians deported or repatriated from the U.S.
• States most affected: Punjab, Haryana, Gujarat, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh.
• Previous major deportation: Feb 5, 2025 — U.S. Air Force C-17 flight with 104 Indians landed in Amritsar, the longest deportation flight in U.S. history.
• India ranks among the top 5 source countries for irregular migrants intercepted at the U.S.–Mexico border.

Economic and Social Drivers

• Push Factors (India):
  • Agrarian distress and rural unemployment in North Indian states.
  • Aspirations for better earnings and social mobility abroad.
  • Social prestige associated with foreign migration in Punjab–Haryana belt.
  • Weak local job opportunities for educated youth.

• Pull Factors (Destination Countries):
  • Labour demand in U.S. service and agriculture sectors.
  • Smuggler networks offering “guaranteed entry” packages.
  • Circulation of social media success stories of those who settled illegally.

The Human Trafficking and Agent Nexus

• Operated by interconnected networks spanning India, Latin America, and U.S.–Mexico border states.
• Payment model: Agents take partial advance in India; balance on “arrival.”
• False promises: Legal work permits, safe passage, or “political asylum.”
• Criminality: Violates the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, and Foreigners Act, 1946.
• Risk factors:
  • Exposure to robbery, extortion, sexual exploitation, and even death.
  • No legal protection or recourse abroad.

U.S. Policy Context

• U.S. Immigration Enforcement: Since 2022, tightened asylum and border-entry policies under Title 8 deportations (post-Title 42 repeal).
• Bilateral cooperation: India and U.S. have agreed to streamline repatriations and combat illegal human trafficking networks.
• Deportees are flown back under ICE Air Operations, with coordination from MEA & Indian missions.

Legal and Diplomatic Aspects

• India’s stance: Zero tolerance toward illegal migration but emphasizes humane treatment of deportees.
• MEA & MHA coordinate with Interpol and U.S. Homeland Security to identify trafficking rackets.
• Embassies facilitate verification, travel documents, and safe return.
• State police & CID investigate local agents under Sections 370 & 420 IPC (Trafficking & Cheating).

Wider National Implications

• Highlights India’s irregular migration crisis, with thousands stranded or jailed abroad.
• Brain drain risk: Educated youth leaving rural India through illegal means due to lack of quality employment.
• Debt crisis: Families forced into bankruptcy after paying ₹30–60 lakh to agents.
• Governance challenge: Need for integration of deportees and rehabilitation schemes at the district level.

Global Context and Parallels

Country/Region	Comparable Trend	Policy Response
Mexico–Central America	“Coyote” networks smuggling Latin Americans to U.S.	U.S. assistance programs, regional migration compacts
North Africa–Europe	Illegal crossings from Libya to Italy/Spain	EU–Africa Migration Partnership; strict maritime border control
Philippines	Irregular migration via Gulf states	Stringent licensing of recruitment agencies
Bangladesh–Malaysia	Human trafficking by sea routes	Joint task forces and rehabilitation policies

Lesson: Global responses combine law enforcement, safe migration awareness, and local job creation.

Government and Policy Response (India)

• MEA Measures:
  • Crackdown on fake travel agents through passport verification & police NOCs.
  • Awareness drives via embassies and state governments.
• MHA & State Police:
  • Haryana CID tracking 100+ suspected human smuggling agents.
  • FIRs under IPC 420, 370, and Passport Act violations.
• Skill Development Link:
  • Integration with PM Vishwakarma Yojana, Skill India Mission to generate domestic employment.
• Migration Governance Framework:
  • Strengthen e-Migrate portal (currently for Gulf migration) to cover Western destinations.
  • Introduce a National Anti-Human Smuggling Policy.

Ethical and Societal Dimensions

• Reflects moral hazard where desperation overrides legality.
• Raises questions on agents’ accountability, state regulation, and society’s glorification of foreign success.
• Deportees face social stigma, making reintegration difficult.

Long-term Way Forward

• Preventive:
  • Awareness campaigns in rural belts on risks of “Dunki” migration.
  • Stricter licensing and monitoring of travel and placement agents.
  • Data-sharing MoUs with the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and Brazil.
• Curative:
  • Rehabilitation schemes for deportees (skill training, debt relief).
  • Legal aid and compensation for victims of trafficking.
  • Collaboration with UNODC & IOM for safe migration corridors.
• Structural:
  • Boost rural livelihoods under PMEGP, NRLM, Agri Value Chains.
  • Promote legal migration routes through bilateral labour agreements.

---

IUCN World Heritage Outlook 4

---

Why in News ?

• The IUCN’s World Heritage Outlook 4 (2025) categorised the Western Ghats, Manas National Park (Assam), and Sundarbans National Park (West Bengal) as “of significant concern” among Asia’s natural World Heritage sites.
• Marks a decline in global conservation performance, with only 57% of sites showing a positive outlook, down from 63% in 2014, 2017, and 2020.

Relevance

• GS-3 (Environment): Conservation, Biodiversity, Environmental Degradation, Climate Change
• GS-2 (Governance): International Cooperation – IUCN, UNESCO, CBD, GBF

About the IUCN World Heritage Outlook

• A global conservation assessment that evaluates the state of all natural and mixed UNESCO World Heritage Sites every three years.
• Uses categories:
  • Good
  • Good with Some Concerns
  • Significant Concern
  • Critical
• Evaluates management effectiveness, threat levels, and conservation prospects.
• Outlook 4 (2025) is based on 200+ site assessments conducted since 2014.

Key Findings (2025)

• Global trend: Decline in positive conservation outlook (from 63% to 57%).
• New threats identified:
  • Roads and railways among top 5 threats (not previously listed).
  • Intensified climate change impact on ecosystems.
• Top four threats in South Asia:
  • Climate Change
  • Tourism Pressure
  • Invasive Alien Species
  • Infrastructure (Roads, Dams)

Sites of “Significant Concern” (India)

1. Western Ghats

• Biodiversity Hotspot: Older than the Himalayas, rich in endemic flora and fauna.
• Home to: ~325 globally threatened species (IUCN Red List).
• Major threats:
  • Hydropower projects (e.g.,₹5,843 crore Sillahalla Pumped Storage Project).
  • Monoculture plantations (eucalyptus, acacia).
  • Tourism-induced waste and elephant-human conflict.
  • Climate-driven species migration (Nilgiri flycatcher shifting to higher altitudes).
• Policy context: Conflicts over Kasturirangan and Gadgil panel recommendations on Western Ghats protection.

2. Manas National Park (Assam)

• UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1985, part of Manas Tiger Reserve.
• Concerns:
  • Encroachment and illegal grazing.
  • Political instability in Bodoland region in the past.
  • Poaching pressure and invasive weeds.
  • Habitat degradation affecting tigers, rhinos, and elephants.

3. Sundarbans National Park (West Bengal)

• World’s largest mangrove delta, shared by India and Bangladesh.
• Home to: Bengal Tiger, estuarine crocodile, fishing cats.
• Key threats:
  • Rising sea levels and salinity.
  • Heavy metal contamination and unregulated fishing.
  • Storm surges and coastal erosion.
  • Shrinking mangrove diversity.

Other Indian Sites (Better Status)

• “Good with Some Concerns”:
  • Kaziranga National Park
  • Keoladeo National Park
  • Great Himalayan National Park
  • Nanda Devi & Valley of Flowers
• “Good”:
  • Khangchendzonga National Park (Sikkim) — only Indian site in this top tier.

Comparative Global Context

• China: Seven sites ranked “bestprotected,” including
  • Mount Huangshan
  • Chengjiang Fossil Site
  • Badain Jaran Desert
• Global Significance:
  • Natural WH sites = <1% of Earth’s surface
  • Host >20% of mapped species richness (>1,00,000 species).
• Global Framework Link:
  • Supports Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) targets to halt biodiversity loss by 2030.

Structural and Policy Challenges (India & Asia)

• Habitat fragmentation: Roads, dams, and linear infrastructure bisect protected areas.
• Poor inter-agency coordination: Forest, energy, and tourism departments often work in silos.
• Invasive species management: Weak enforcement of biosecurity norms.
• Tourism mismanagement: Unregulated resorts, vehicular pollution, waste mismanagement.
• Climate adaptation gaps: Lack of wildlife corridors and assisted migration policies.

Positive Interventions & Opportunities

• Eco-Sensitive Zone (ESZ) notifications under Environment (Protection) Act.
• Project Tiger & Project Elephant integration for landscape-level conservation.
• Global support: UNESCO-IUCN collaboration under the “World Heritage Leadership Programme”.
• Community-based conservation:
  • Western Ghats’ sacred groves (community-preserved patches).
  • Eco-development in buffer zones (e.g., Kaziranga’s rural livelihood schemes).

Way Forward

• Policy Coherence: Integrate biodiversity into energy, infrastructure, and tourism planning.
• Climate-Resilient Conservation:
  • Strengthen climate refugia within protected areas.
  • Monitor species migration patterns.
• Restoration over Protection: Move from reactive to proactive habitat restoration.
• Technology Integration: Remote sensing, AI-based forest cover tracking, DNA barcoding for invasive species.
• Local Community Empowerment: Expand Joint Forest Management (JFM) to heritage zones.
• Global Partnerships: Use India’s G20 “LiFE” and CBD-GBF commitments to fund restoration and adaptation projects.

---

22nd India–ASEAN Summit (Kuala Lumpur, 2025)

---

Why in News ?

• PM Narendra Modi addressed the 22nd ASEAN–India Summit (October 2025, Kuala Lumpur) virtually.
• Highlighted that the India–ASEAN Comprehensive Strategic Partnership remains resilient amid global geopolitical uncertainties.
• Announced plans to enhance maritime security cooperation in 2026.
• Timor-Leste was formally welcomed as ASEAN’s newest member.

Relevance  

• GS-2(International Relations) : India’s Act East Policy, Bilateral & Regional Groupings, Indo-Pacific Cooperation.

India–ASEAN Partnership

• Initiated: 1992 (Sectoral Dialogue Partner) → Full Dialogue Partner (1996) → Strategic Partnership (2012) → Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (2022).
• Institutional Mechanisms:
  • Annual ASEAN–India Summit (since 2002).
  • East Asia Summit (EAS), ADMM+ (Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus), ARF (ASEAN Regional Forum).
• ASEAN Members (11 including new entrant Timor-Leste):
  Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, and Timor-Leste (2025).

Highlights of PM Modi’s Remarks

• “Even in this era of uncertainties” (referring to wars, supply chain disruptions, and global power shifts), India–ASEAN partnership remains strong.
• Called ASEAN a “cultural partner”, emphasizing shared civilizational heritage — Buddhism, maritime trade, Nalanda links.
• Stated: “The 21st century is the century of India and ASEAN.”
• Proposed enhanced cooperation in maritime security, especially in:
  • Freedom of Navigation and maritime domain awareness (MDA).
  • Joint patrols, disaster response, and anti-piracy measures.
• Reaffirmed support for a free, open, and rules-based Indo-Pacific, aligned with ASEAN Outlook on Indo-Pacific (AOIP) and India’s Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative (IPOI).

Strategic & Economic Context

• India–ASEAN Trade (2024): Over USD 130 billion, with target to reach USD 200 billion by 2030.
• Investment: ASEAN is India’s 4th largest trading partner; India is ASEAN’s 6th largest.
• Key Sectors: Electronics, digital economy, renewable energy, pharmaceuticals, supply chains.
• Maritime Security Significance:
  • ~90% of India’s trade by volume passes through the Indo-Pacific sea lanes.
  • ASEAN’s centrality crucial for maintaining balance amid China’s assertiveness in South China Sea.

Why the 2025 Summit Matters ?

• Geopolitical backdrop:
  • Ukraine war and Israel conflict disrupting global energy and food security.
  • China’s Belt and Road expansion and militarization in the South China Sea.
  • India’s “Act East Policy” and Indo-Pacific vision gaining traction among ASEAN partners.
• Maritime cooperation push reflects:
  • India’s strategic intent to counterbalance China.
  • Strengthening of supply-chain resilience and digital connectivity through ASEAN.
• Inclusion of Timor-Leste expands ASEAN’s footprint, bridging Southeast Asia and the Pacific.

Institutional Cooperation Frameworks

• Plan of Action (2021–2025): To implement the ASEAN–India Partnership Vision.
• Next Plan (2026–2030): Expected to integrate maritime, digital, and climate dimensions.
• ASEAN–India Maritime Exercise (AIME 2023): First joint naval drill in South China Sea.
• Connectivity Initiatives:
  • India–Myanmar–Thailand Trilateral Highway.
  • Kaladan Multimodal Transit Project.
  • ASEAN–India Air Transport Agreement (under negotiation).

Cultural & People-to-People Ties

• Shared Heritage: Ancient trade and cultural links — from Chola–Srivijaya maritime ties to spread of Buddhism.
• Scholarship & Education: Over 1,000 ASEAN students study in India under ASEAN–India Fellowship Programme.
• Tourism & Connectivity: Promotion of Buddhist circuit, direct air links, and digital visas.

Challenges

• Trade Imbalance: ASEAN’s exports to India outweigh imports.
• Slow Project Execution: Connectivity projects (like IMT Highway) face delays.
• China’s Influence: ASEAN’s economic dependence on China limits strategic alignment with India.
• Political Instability: Military coup in Myanmar complicates connectivity routes.

Global Comparisons

• Japan–ASEAN (2023): “Golden Friendship” initiative for green and digital partnerships.
• US–ASEAN (2024): Comprehensive Strategic Partnership focusing on AI, semiconductors.
• India–ASEAN (2025): Prioritising maritime security, youth exchanges, and resilient supply chains, balancing economic and strategic goals.

Way Forward

• Strengthen Indo-Pacific Partnerships: Align ASEAN’s AOIP with India’s IPOI for regional synergy.
• Focus on Blue Economy: Marine resource sustainability, ocean energy, and fisheries.
• Accelerate Connectivity: Fast-track IMT Highway & Kaladan projects for trade integration.
• Digital and Green Corridors: Promote EV supply chains, renewable energy linkages.
• Institutional Deepening: Launch ASEAN–India 2.0 framework (2026–2030) with measurable goals.

---

Municipal bonds now eligible for repo, reverse repo deals

---

Why in News ?

• The Finance Ministry has allowed municipal bonds to be used as eligible collateral in repo and reverse repo transactions, as per a notification under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Act, 1992.
• This move effectively creates a new investible asset class and aims to deepen India’s municipal bond market.

Relevance

• GS-3 (Economy): Financial markets, urban infrastructure financing, fiscal decentralization.
• GS-2 (Governance): Strengthening local governance and municipal accountability.
• GS-1 (Urbanization): Financing challenges of rapidly urbanizing India.

Concept Basics: What are Municipal Bonds

• Definition: Debt instruments issued by Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) to raise funds for infrastructure projects (e.g., water supply, sanitation, urban mobility).
• Types:
  • General Obligation Bonds: Backed by the issuer’s credit and taxing power.
  • Revenue Bonds: Secured by specific revenue streams (e.g., tolls, user charges).
• Legal Framework in India:
  • SEBI’s 2015 Regulations – Issue and Listing of Debt Securities by Municipalities.
  • Requires credit rating, financial disclosure, and no default record in previous 365 days.

Significance of Allowing Repo Eligibility

Liquidity and Depth

• Before: Municipal bonds were largely illiquid, held mainly by long-term investors (pension funds, ESG investors).
• Now: Can be used for short-term borrowing/lending, attracting banks, mutual funds, insurers, etc.
• Enhances market depth, price discovery, and liquidity.

Broader Investor Base

• Expands participation from institutional investors who prefer liquid securities.
• Improves credit visibility and market confidence in ULBs.

Infrastructure Financing

• Enables cash-strapped municipalities to fund urban infrastructure (water, waste, transport, green projects) through market borrowings rather than dependence on grants.

Fiscal Decentralization

• Strengthens financial autonomy of urban local bodies, consistent with the 74th Constitutional Amendment and Atmanirbhar Bharat’s decentralisation goals.

Inclusion in Money Market Ecosystem

• Puts municipal bonds on par with sovereign and corporate bonds for short-term liquidity operations.

Challenges & Constraints

Challenge	Explanation
Low Credit Quality of ULBs	Most municipalities have weak balance sheets, limited revenue sources (property tax collection <0.2% of GDP).
Lack of Disclosure & Transparency	Many ULBs don’t maintain audited accounts or meet SEBI disclosure norms.
Limited Investor Appetite	Past issuances (₹3,300 crore as of Sep 2025) are minuscule compared to central/state issuances (₹20–25 lakh crore annually).
Risk of Default	Despite being “secured”, weak governance and revenue unpredictability raise credit risk.
Capacity Gaps	Small/medium ULBs lack technical capacity to issue or manage bonds effectively.

Data & Trends

• First modern municipal bond: Ahmedabad, 1998.
• Total raised till 2025: ~₹3,300 crore (SEBI).
• Top issuers: Pune, Hyderabad, Indore, Surat, Ahmedabad, and Lucknow.
• GoI incentive: ₹13 crore for every ₹100 crore bond issue (since FY18).
• Credit Costs: Gradual moderation in H2FY26 as repayment trends improve (Kotak Mahindra Bank).

Global Context

Country	Model / Lesson
United States	$4 trillion municipal bond market; deeply liquid; backed by local tax revenues and often insured; key to financing schools, roads, and hospitals.
Japan	Local government bonds supported by strong fiscal discipline and transparent credit data.
Brazil	Uses municipal debt for urban transport and housing, supported by fiscal transfer guarantees.
South Africa	Johannesburg pioneered local government bonds (2004) to fund urban infrastructure; backed by robust local governance frameworks.

Learning for India:
Need for robust credit rating system, disclosure norms, and municipal finance reform to emulate mature bond ecosystems.

Policy & Institutional Enablers

• SEBI 2015 Regulations – standardised issuance process.
• 15th Finance Commission – recommended incentives for municipal bond issuances.
• AMRUT 2.0 and National Urban Infrastructure Fund (NUIF) – facilitate city-level creditworthiness enhancement.
• Smart Cities Mission – encourages credit rating of cities.
• RBI & SEBI Coordination – repo eligibility links bond market to central liquidity mechanisms.

Way Forward

1. Credit Enhancement Mechanisms: State guarantees, pooled finance models (like Tamil Nadu Urban Development Fund).
2. Transparency Reforms: Mandatory annual financial disclosures of ULBs.
3. Digital Municipal Market Infrastructure: Centralized municipal bond exchange portal for real-time trading.
4. Capacity Building: Training local officials on project finance and bond issuance.
5. Green & Social Bonds: Promote ESG-focused municipal instruments to attract sustainable finance.