Climate variability: Droughts, floods, pest infestations.
Price volatility: Market fluctuations impacting income stability.
Low risk-bearing capacity: Financial and structural constraints.
Objectives of FDI
Early Warning System: Provides alerts three months in advance to assist policymakers.
Structured Assessment:
Identifies distress at sub-district levels.
Seven key parameters used for analysis.
Policy Framework:
Scalable model for nationwide implementation.
Helps in prioritizing government interventions.
Ensures timely response to regions at higher distress levels.
Seven Key Indicators of FDI
Exposure to Risk:
Loss due to pests, diseases, floods, droughts.
Adaptive Capacity:
Education level of household head.
Total land owned & leased-in land.
Sensitivity:
Percentage of irrigated land.
Level of indebtedness.
Social vulnerability (SC/ST population, family size).
Mitigation & Adaptation Strategies:
Non-farm income dependency.
Access to government schemes.
Household savings.
Triggers:
Reliance on informal credit.
Loan repayment pressure.
Immediate cash constraints.
Psychological Factors:
Social isolation.
Inability to meet family obligations.
Substance addiction (e.g., alcohol).
Impact Assessment:
Rising indebtedness.
Increased reliance on MGNREGA & public works.
Reduction in food consumption.
Benefits of FDI Implementation
Predictive Tool: Enables authorities to proactively address farmer distress rather than reactive measures.
Region-Specific Solutions:
Helps in designing customized distress management plans.
Encourages localizedsolutions instead of generic nationwide policies.
Government Policy Support:
Assists in effective allocation of resources to high-distress areas.
Strengthens integration of existing schemes like PM Fasal Bima Yojana.
Challenges & Recommendations
Lack of National-Level Implementation:
Urgent need to scale the pilot study to a national framework.
Data Collection & Validation:
Require better real-time data monitoring systems.
Integration with Other Schemes:
Link FDI indicators with welfare programs such as PM-KISAN, crop insurance, and rural credit policies.
Farmer Awareness & Participation:
Conduct awareness campaigns to educate farmers on distress mitigation strategies.
Conclusion
Farmers’ Distress Index (FDI) is a transformative tool that can help predict and alleviate agrarian distress.
Early warning mechanisms provide an opportunity for policymakers to intervene before crises escalate.
A nationwide rollout, backed by real-time data integration, can improve resilience in the agriculture sector.
Institutional support and community engagement are key to ensuring the long-term success of FDI.
PROMOTION OF PM-DAKSH SCHEME
Overview
PM-DAKSH Scheme: A Central Sector Scheme initiated in 2020-21.
Objective: Provides skill development training to marginalized communities including Scheduled Castes (SCs), Other Backward Classes (OBCs), Economically Weaker Sections (EWS), De-Notified, Nomadic and Semi-Nomadic Tribes (DNTs), Safai Karamcharis, and Waste Pickers.
Implementation: Conducted through empanelled training institutes.
Employment Outcome: 56.40% of trained individuals secured employment or started enterprises (till 2022-23).
Training Categories:
Up-skilling/Re-skilling: Enhancing existing skills for better job opportunities.
Short-Term Training: Industry-aligned courses for fresh job seekers.
Entrepreneurship Development Programs (EDP): Encouraging self-employment through business skills training.
Long-Term Training: Advanced skilling for specialized professions.
Relevance : GS 1(Society) , GS 2(Social Justice)
Implementing Agencies
Department of Social Justice and Empowerment oversees the implementation.
Three Corporations under the department:
National Scheduled Castes Finance and Development Corporation (NSFDC)
National Backward Classes Finance and Development Corporation (NBCFDC)
National Safai Karamcharis Finance and Development Corporation (NSKFDC)
Responsible for grievance redressal and taking remedial measures.
Promotion & Awareness
Publicity through:
Print & Social Media campaigns on a Pan-India basis.
Awareness camps organized by training institutes targeting specific communities.
Community outreach programs to educate potential beneficiaries.
Training Institute Empanelment Process
Project Appraisal Committee (PAC) evaluates training institutes based on predefined parameters.
Empanelment of Institutes:
Institutes must be affiliated with the Skill India Digital Hub (SIDH) of the Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE).
Ensures compliance with skilling standards and infrastructure requirements.
Currently, no training institutes are empanelled under the scheme.
Regular monitoring and evaluation of training quality and placement outcomes.
Skilling, Assessment & Certification
Trainees undergo assessment and certification by respective Sector Skill Councils (SSC) or Assessment Bodies.
Certification ensures industry recognition and enhances employability.
Placement opportunities provided post-certification in wage-employment or self-employment.
Industry Linkages & Placement
Training institutes are responsible for industrial tie-ups to facilitate proper placement.
Final installment of funds is released to institutes only after submitting placement details of trained candidates.
Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) ensures stipend disbursal to trainees meeting attendance criteria.
Entrepreneurship support: Trained individuals are encouraged to start small businesses with financial assistance from the Corporations.
Key Challenges & Recommendations
Lack of empanelled training institutes: Need for greater participation of quality institutes.
Placement constraints: Strengthening industry collaborations to improve job opportunities.
Awareness gaps: Expanding community outreach and leveraging digital platforms for better scheme visibility.
Monitoring & Evaluation: Regular impact assessment to ensure quality outcomes.
Conclusion
PM-DAKSH aims to bridge skill gaps among marginalized communities through structured training programs.
Effective promotion and expansion of empanelled training institutes can enhance the scheme’s impact.
Ensuring quality skilling and industry tie-ups is critical for increasing employment outcomes.
Greater industry collaboration, financial support for entrepreneurs, and streamlined execution can further improve scheme efficiency.