Editorials/Opinions Analysis For UPSC 21 July 2025
Content India can reframe the Artificial Intelligence debate Temples of social justice The Soil of a Nation India can reframe the Artificial Intelligence debate Key Issues Raised Geopolitical AI fragmentation: US-UK rejected the 2025 Paris AI Declaration, while China supported it. Governments lag behind Big Tech in regulating and steering AI responsibly. Global South’s under-representation in key AI forums. Relevance : GS2 (International Relations) & GS3 (Science & Tech) – AI diplomacy, global governance, India’s digital leadership. Practice Question: India is uniquely positioned to democratise global AI governance. Discuss with reference to the upcoming AI Impact Summit and India’s digital public infrastructure model. (250 words) India’s Strategic Leverage Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI): Aadhaar, UPI as inclusive tech models Democratic consultative edge: MyGov platform crowdsourced summit agenda Bridging power: India’s credibility with both Western and developing nations Five Actionable Ideas from India’s Experience Pledges + Scoreboard: Each stakeholder commits 1 AI goal (e.g. AI in rural education, health translation tools). Public tracking ensures accountability beyond optics. Front-row Seat for Global South: Push for inclusive participation in leadership photos and policy decisions. Propose “AI for Billions” Fund: Cloud credits, fellowships, multilingual data support. Global AI Safety Collaborative: Develop shared checklists, stress tests, and incident logs across nations. India’s institute can lead with an open-access evaluation kit. Middle Path on Regulation: Avoid extremes of US deregulation, EU rigidity, China’s state control. Draft a voluntary Frontier AI Code: red-team disclosure, compute transparency, accident hotline. Prevent AI Forum Fragmentation: Promote broad-based, non-aligned agenda. Bridge tensions between tech blocs (US-China) with constructive diplomacy. Value Addition: India’s Comparative Advantage Digital Public Goods Champion: Endorsed at G20, DPI model scalable to other nations Neutral Diplomatic Actor: Trusted by both the West and Global South Technological Depth + Political Will: IndiaStack, Bhashini, and National AI Mission already in play Possible Prelims Angle AI Safety Summit 2023 – hosted at Bletchley Park, UK MyGov platform – public engagement tool by MeitY Seoul Pledge – international commitment on safe frontier AI Temples of social justice Context Controversy in Tamil Nadu over use of temple surplus funds for building colleges. Raises key issues of religion, law, and social justice, particularly in South India. Relevance : GS1 (Indian Society) & GS2 (Governance, Polity) – Religion and law, temple reforms, social justice in South India. Practice Question: Temples have historically served both spiritual and social roles. Analyse how modern state regulation of temples in Tamil Nadu reflects a continuity of this tradition in advancing social justice. (250 words) Historical Legislative Framework 1817: Religious Endowments and Escheats Regulation by East India Company – first attempt to regulate temple funds. 1858: Queen Victoria’s Proclamation promised non-interference in religious practices post-1857 Mutiny. British Approach: No interference in core religious rituals. Regulation allowed over secular aspects like land, administration of endowments. Justice Party & Hindu Religious Endowments 1922: Justice Party introduces Bill No. 12 to regulate Hindu temple funds. 1925: Law enacted despite opposition—allowed diversion of surplus temple funds for secular welfare. Legacy Law: Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959: Section 36: Surplus temple funds can be diverted with Commissioner’s approval. Section 66: Funds can support universities/colleges teaching Hindu religion or temple architecture. Temples as Socio-Cultural Institutions Historically (e.g. Chola & Vijayanagara periods), temples were: Centres of learning and culture. Recipients of royal land and resource endowments. Inscriptions confirm their use for education and welfare purposes. Constitutional Validity The 1959 Act and its provisions have been upheld by courts. Use of surplus for education is legal and aligned with the original historical intent of temple use. Social Justice and Temple Reform Self-Respect Movement → pushed for state regulation of temples to: Fight casteism. Enable temple entry laws (1936, 1947). Enable appointment of non-Brahmin priests (e.g. TN, Kerala). State oversight is crucial to uphold: Anti-caste justice. Equitable use of public religious resources. Current Relevance As elections approach, political rhetoric may distort facts. Clarity on the legal-historical-social framework can prevent voter polarisation. Value Additions 1. Constitutional Backing Article 25(2)(a) empowers the State to regulate secular activities of religious institutions for reform and welfare. Justifies using temple funds for education, health, and social uplift within Hindu community. 2. Judicial Precedent Shirur Mutt Case (1954): Supreme Court drew a distinction between religious and secular activities. Held that management of temple funds falls under secular domain, allowing state regulation. 3. Historical Continuity Chola and Pandya eras: Temples ran Vedic schools, libraries, hospitals, and granaries. Shows continuity of using temple resources for both religious and secular welfare. 4. Colonial and Pre-Independence Roots 1817 Religious Endowment Act (British): First state entry into temple finance. 1922 & 1925 reforms: Enabled use of surplus temple income for Hindu education and welfare — long before 1959 Act. 5. HR&CE Act, 1959 Legal basis for current practice in Tamil Nadu. Allows use of surplus funds for: Hindu schools and hostels Orphanages, maternity centres, and annadanam Educational scholarships, pilgrimage aid 6. Social Justice Impact in Tamil Nadu Enabled temple entry for Dalits (1939 Madurai; 1947 across Tamil Nadu). Facilitated non-Brahmin priest appointments and inclusive temple administration. Funded hostels, Veda Pathashalas, and scholarships for Hindu SCs and OBCs. The Soil of a Nation Source : TIE Central Argument India needs a paradigm shift in agricultural policy — from indiscriminate use of fertilisers to tailored, science-based soil nutrition management — to enhance both crop yield and human nutrition. Context India has achieved food surplus status, becoming the world’s largest rice exporter in FY25 (202 MT). Despite this, malnutrition and undernutrition remain significant due to poor micronutrient content in crops. Current practices focus on caloric sufficiency, but not nutrient density, especially micronutrients like zinc, iron, and sulfur. Relevance: GS3 (Agriculture, Environment, Health) – Soil health, fertiliser reform, nutrition-sensitive farming. Practice Question: Despite food surplus, India suffers from hidden hunger due to poor soil health. Examine how a soil-first agricultural strategy can ensure nutritional security in India. (250 words) Core Issues Highlighted 1. Soil Nutrient Deficiency Crisis (2024 Status) Based on Soil Health Card Scheme (2024) data: Nutrient % Soils Low/Deficient Nitrogen (N) 25.2% Phosphorus (P) 45.5% Potassium (K) 11% Sulphur (S) 25.4% Zinc (Zn) 53.5% Boron (B) 41.5% Organic Carbon 71.1% soils insufficient (as SOC) Zinc deficiency in soil translates into zinc-poor cereals, leading to cognitive issues, stunting, and child malnutrition. The deficiency of SOC (Soil Organic Carbon) implies poor soil structure, low water retention, and low microbial activity. 2. Misuse and Imbalance of Fertilisers Overuse of Urea (Nitrogen): 54% excess use in states like Telangana. Underuse of P & K: Phosphorus short by 8% Potassium short by 89% This imbalanced fertilisation leads to: Declining soil health and crop nutrition. Nutrient mining: Continuous depletion of specific nutrients. Environmental harm: Nitrogen leaching, water contamination, greenhouse gas emissions. 3. Health Implications Nutrient-deficient soils = Nutrient-deficient crops = Malnourished humans. The poor nutrition of crops leads to: Stunting Reduced immunity Cognitive delays Lower workforce productivity Key Recommendations A. Reform Fertiliser Use Move from blanket subsidy-based fertiliser policies to: Customised fertiliser recommendations based on soil test data. Nutrient-based subsidy reform. Balanced application of N-P-K-S-Zn-B. B. Revamp Soil Health Card Scheme Make it dynamic, digital, and location-specific. Link with real-time nutrient dashboards and farmer advisory apps. Track micronutrient status and recommend crop rotations. C. Promote Organic Carbon and Bio-inputs Use of: Crop residues Green manure Biofertilisers Agroforestry D. Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture Focus on nutrient-rich crops like millets, pulses, biofortified grains. Integrate public health goals into agri-policy. Institutional Response ICRIER & OCP Nutricrops are piloting: Data-driven, soil-specific interventions. Internationally benchmarked soil health solutions. Technology-based diagnostics for farmers. Conclusion “We must start by healing Mother Earth. Only then can we walk as a healthy nation.” The article advocates a shift in India’s agri-policy thinking — from a “calorie-sufficiency mindset” to a soil-first, nutrition-sensitive strategy. Only through data-driven, region-specific soil nutrition management can India secure agricultural resilience and national health outcomes.