Posts

Daily Editorials Analysis

Editorials/Opinions Analysis For UPSC 10 December 2025

Content: Care as disability justice, dignity in mental health Charting an agenda on the right to health Care as disability justice, dignity in mental health  Why is in News? A recent opinion piece by practitioners from The Banyan highlights: Deep gaps in India’s mental health-care model The limits of a purely biomedical and deficit-based approach The urgent need for a dignity, equity, and disability justice–centred framework The article gains policy relevance due to: Persistently high suicide burden 70–90% global mental health treatment gap Rising concerns over: Institutional abuse Homelessness Continuity of care failures Relevance GS-2: Governance, Constitution & Social Justice Right to mental health under Article 21 (Right to Life) State responsibility for: Rehabilitation Continuity of care Institutional accountability Failure of: Community mental health integration Aftercare & housing support Mental health as a rights-based welfare obligation, not charity GS-3: Health Sector & Human Development India’s 70–90% treatment gap in mental health care Structural neglect: Severe shortage of psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers Over-reliance on: Tertiary hospitals Pharmacological solutions Weakness of: District Mental Health Programme (DMHP) Practice Question Mental health is no longer merely a medical issue but a question of governance, dignity, and social justice.”Critically analyse.(250 Words) What is meant by Mental Health & Psychological Disability? Mental Health (WHO understanding) A state of: Emotional well-being Ability to handle stress Productive functioning Meaningful social participation Psychosocial Disability Disability arising from: Mental illness plus Social barriers (stigma, exclusion, poverty, institutional neglect) Recognised under: Rights-based disability frameworks UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) Article’s Core Arguement Mental health suffering: Cannot be captured by statistics alone Requires attention to: Lived experience Trauma histories Social abandonment Present system: Focuses on “fixing the patient” Ignores: Broken families Violence Homelessness Caste, gender, class marginalisation The article calls for: A shift from clinical correction → dignity, justice, and relational care Data Points From National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) suicide data: ~33% suicides → Family problems ~10% suicides → Relational breakdowns Key emotional drivers (largely invisible in data): Shame Rejection Alienation Abandonment Insight: India’s distress is relational and social, not just clinical. Critical Gaps in Current Mental Health Care Model  Deficit Lens People seen as: “Maladaptive” “Unmanageable” Not as: Survivors of: Abuse Structural neglect Over-medicalisation Bias Excess focus on: Neurotransmitters Diagnosis Pills Under-focus on: Meaning Purpose Belonging Human relationships Continuity of Care Failure Many patients: Drop out Lose faith in institutions Slide into: Homelessness Chronic despair Context Blindness Social causes not integrated: Housing insecurity Economic precarity Gender violence Caste exclusion Queer marginalisation Intersectional Model  The article rejects single-cause explanations and supports overlapping causation: Domain Examples Biological Neurotransmitters, inflammation Psychological Trauma, learned helplessness Social Isolation, poverty Cultural Loss of meaning systems Political Oppression, weak welfare Historical Intergenerational trauma, colonial legacy Key Point: These act simultaneously, not in competition. Disability Justice Disability justice goes beyond: Hospital access Medication availability It demands: Dignity Equity Inclusion Context-sensitive care Care becomes: A relational process Not a transactional service Reimagining Care From Treatment → Meaningful Life Shift from: “Symptom reduction” To: “What does this person need to live the life they want?” From Linear Recovery → Non-linear Healing Accept: Setbacks Relapses Long-term dependence on support From Institutional Control → Relational Justice Trust building Honest collaboration Dialogic care From Specialist Monopoly → Lived Experience Practitioners Recognise: Peer supporters Community caregivers Provide: Training Remuneration Institutional backing Combined Necessity Material Needs Relational Needs Housing Belonging Income Trust Medication Purpose Food Identity The article asserts: You cannot heal only with a house, and you cannot heal only with medicines. Implications for Mental Health Education and Research Education Must Train For: Sitting with uncertainty Navigating social complexity Celebrating small recovery wins Ethical discomfort handling Research Must Shift Toward: Implementation science Micro-level care processes Transdisciplinary methods Real-world sensitive evidence Longitudinal trust-based outcomes Conclusion India’s mental health crisis: Is not only a medical challenge It is a social, ethical, economic, and governance crisis True reform requires: Moving from clinical efficiency → moral responsibility From symptom control → dignified living Without addressing: Poverty Violence Social abandonment Discrimination → Mental health systems will remain fragmented and ineffective Charting an agenda on the right to health  Why is in News? The National Convention on Health Rights (11–12 December 2025) is being held in New Delhi, timed between: Human Rights Day – Dec 10 Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Day – Dec 12 Organised by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), a nationwide civil society coalition active in 20+ States. Around 400 public health professionals, activists, and community leaders will: Review lessons from COVID-19 Oppose commercialisation and privatisation of health care Renew demands for Right to Health as a Fundamental Right Relevance GS-2: Governance, Constitution & Social Justice Right to Health under Article 21 State vs Market in welfare provisioning Regulation of private health sector Federal health financing gaps Discrimination in service delivery GS-3: Health, Economy & Human Development Public health expenditure crisis Insurance vs public provisioning Medicine price regulation Health workforce as economic infrastructure Climate & pollution as health risks Practice Question India’s mental health crisis reflects the failure of community-based and continuity-driven care.Discuss with reference to homelessness, relapse, and disengagement from treatment. (250 Words) What is Right to Health ? Constitutional Status in India Not explicitly a Fundamental Right Interpreted under: Article 21 – Right to Life Strengthened through: Directive Principles: Article 38 – Social justice Article 39 – Health of workers Article 47 – Duty of State to improve public health International Basis Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) – Article 25 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) – Article 12 Embedded in Universal Health Coverage (UHC) principle: Access to quality health services without financial hardship Core Message of the Convention “Health care for people, not for profits.” The convention argues that: India’s health system is being pushed towards privatisation This threatens: Affordability Equity Universal access Health must be treated as: A public good Not a market commodity Issue 1: PRIVATISATION & PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (PPPs) What is happening? Medical colleges & public health facilities being: Handed over to private players Expansion of: PPP-based healthcare delivery Why is it problematic? Weakens: Public hospitals Primary Health Centres (PHCs) Increases: Out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) Converts: Patients → paying customers Ground Resistance Movements Andhra Pradesh Karnataka Mumbai Madhya Pradesh Tribal Gujarat Issue 2: UNREGULATED PRIVATE HEALTH SECTOR Private healthcare expansion driven by: Domestic & foreign investment Pro-corporate health policies Regulation remains weak despite: Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act Consequences for Patients Overcharging Unnecessary procedures (especially C-sections) Opaque pricing Violation of patient rights Convention Demands Rate standardisation Transparent pricing Mandatory enforcement of: Charter of Patient’s Rights Accessible grievance redressal systems Issue 3: CHRONIC UNDERFUNDING OF PUBLIC HEALTH Current Public Health Spending Only ~2% of Union Budget allocated to health Annual per capita public health spending ≈ $25 Among the lowest globally Structural Outcome High Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) Insurance-heavy model without: Strengthened public hospitals Convention’s Key Critique Govt health insurance schemes: Claims > Reality Demand shifting to: Higher direct public spending Reduced OOPE Universal free public provisioning Issue 4: JUSTICE FOR HEALTH WORKERS COVID-19 Exposed: Dependence on: Doctors Nurses Paramedics Sanitation & support staff Persistent Problems Low wages Insecure contracts No social security Unsafe working conditions Convention Demand: Decent work, legal protection & workforce rights as a pillar of resilient health systems Issue 5: ACCESS TO MEDICINES Key Data Medicines = up to 50% of household medical spending >80% of medicines outside price control Market Failures Irrational drug combinations Unethical marketing High retail mark-ups Convention Proposals Stronger price regulation Remove GST on medicines Expand public sector drug manufacturing Enforce rational prescription norms Issue 6: SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION IN HEALTH CARE Special focus on: Dalits Adivasis Muslims LGBTQ+ persons Persons with disabilities Problems: Denial of care Poor quality treatment Stigma & structural exclusion Convention Lens: Health is not just biological — it is deeply social and political Issue 7: SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH Health linked with: Food security Air & water pollution Climate change Housing Employment Convention Approach: Inter-sectoral health governance “Health in All Policies” framework Parliamentary Engagement   Convention timed during: Winter Session of Parliament Delegates will engage directly with: Parliament of India Aim: Influence legislative debate on: Right to Health Public health financing Medical regulation Workforce laws 25 Years of Jan Swastya Abhiyan Active since 2000 Worked across: Women’s movements Rural groups Science collectives Patient rights platforms Known for: Pro-people health advocacy Public sector defence Medicines access campaigns Conclusion The National Convention on Health Rights, 2025 represents: A direct ideological challenge to health commercialisation A renewed civil society push for universal, publicly funded health care Central message: India cannot achieve Universal Health Coverage through privatisation, insurance alone, or weak regulation. The future of Indian health must rest on: Strong public systems Adequate government financing Workforce justice Medicine affordability Social inclusion Only then can health truly become a Fundamental Right in practice, not just in principle.

Daily Current Affairs

Current Affairs 10 December 2025

Content India–U.S. rice tariff issue High Court judge impeachment move Gannon’s Storm discovery SURYAKIRAN-XIX Cyber Slavery Racket in Southeast Asia  India–U.S. rice tariff issue Why in News? Days before a U.S. trade delegation led by Rick Switzer arrived in New Delhi (Dec 10–12), Donald Trump hinted at fresh tariffs on Indian rice. The claim: India is “dumping” rice in the U.S. market. Statement made during a White House meeting while announcing a $12 billion farm support package. Question raised to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent regarding India’s “exemption” on rice. This comes when the U.S. has already imposed 50% tariffs on Indian exports in multiple sectors. Relevance GS II – International Relations India–U.S. trade relations under stress. Impact of protectionism under Donald Trump-style economic nationalism. Trade diplomacy amidst strategic partnership narrative (QUAD vs tariffs contradiction). Use of tariffs as coercive foreign policy tools. GS III – Economy & Agriculture MSP-based procurement and export competitiveness. Agricultural exports vs global protectionism. WTO Agreement on Agriculture – public stockholding & dumping dispute. Impact on: Farmer income stability Food inflation abroad Export market diversification Core Economic Facts 1. Trade Asymmetry in Rice Only ~3% of India’s total rice exports go to the U.S. Over 25% of total U.S. rice imports come from India Conclusion: India is not dependent on U.S. U.S. is highly dependent on India Inference: Any tariff shock hurts U.S. consumers more than Indian exporters. Dumping: Is the allegation valid? Dumping (WTO definition): Exporting goods below domestic cost/price to capture foreign markets. Indian rice exports: Backed by: Low cost of production Economies of scale MSP-based procurement Not proven as: Below production cost Below domestic wholesale price Conclusion: U.S. claim is political, not legally established under WTO rules. Strategic Context 1. Domestic U.S. Politics Trump’s statement made alongside: $12 billion farm bailout Pressure from American farmer lobbies Objective: Signal protectionism Externalise domestic agrarian stress 2. Trade Negotiation Pressure Tactic Timed just before: India–U.S. tariff negotiations Classic U.S. strategy: Create pre-negotiation pressure Use sector-specific threats (rice) as leverage Who Loses If Rice Tariff Is Imposed? Impact on the U.S. Sharp rise in: Retail rice prices Food inflation Disproportionately affects: Low-income and immigrant consumers No quick alternative suppliers at Indian scale + price Impact on India Minimal export loss due to: Market diversification: West Asia Africa Southeast Asia U.S. market is non-critical for Indian rice WTO & Legal Angle Anti-Dumping duties require: Cost-price investigation Injury to domestic industry Unilateral tariff announcement: Violates spirit of multilateral trade rules Reflects weaponisation of tariffs Strategic Implications for India Reinforces need for: Export market diversification Reduced dependence on U.S. trade leverage Strengthens India’s case for: South–South trade Agro-export diplomacy Shows limits of: “Strategic partnership” under transactional protectionism Link with MSP, Food Security & Global Image India’s rice dominance stems from: MSP-backed procurement High buffer stocks Green Revolution legacy U.S. attack indirectly targets: India’s food security architecture Public stockholding system (WTO AoA debate) Broader Trend: Return of Trump-era Protectionism Sectoral targeting: Steel, auto, pharma earlier Rice now Tools used: National interest Dumping allegations Farm lobby pressure Conclusion The proposed U.S. tariff on Indian rice is economically irrational, politically motivated, and strategically self-damaging. It exposes: Fragility of U.S. commitment to free trade Weaponisation of tariffs for electoral optics India remains structurally resilient due to: Market diversification Cost leadership Global rice dominance High Court judge impeachment move  Why in News? 107 MPs of the INDIA bloc submitted a notice to Om Birla seeking impeachment of Justice G.R. Swaminathan, judge of the Madras High Court (Madurai Bench). Allegations: Deciding cases on political-ideological lines Bias towards a particular community Undue favour to a senior advocate Violation of secular character of the Constitution Triggering case: Direction to light Karthigai Deepam on a deepasthambam near a dargah atop the Thirupparankundram hill. Relevance GS 2 – Polity & Constitution Removal of constitutional authorities Judicial independence vs accountability Secularism and Basic Structure GS 4 – Ethics & Integrity Judicial ethics Conflict of interest Public perception of impartiality Constitutional Basics: How Are High Court Judges Removed? Relevant Articles Article 217 → Appointment & removal of High Court judges Article 124(4) → Removal procedure (borrowed from Supreme Court judges) Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 → Detailed investigation mechanism Grounds of Removal (Only Two) Proved misbehaviour Proved incapacity “Judicial error” or “unpopular judgment” is NOT a ground for removal. Step-by-Step Removal Process (Impeachment) Motion signed by: 100 Lok Sabha MPs OR 50 Rajya Sabha MPs Speaker/Chairman admits the motion 3-member Judicial Inquiry Committee formed: One SC judge One HC Chief Justice One distinguished jurist If charges are proved: Motion voted in both Houses separately Special majority required: Majority of total membership 2/3rd of members present & voting President issues removal order What Is Being Alleged in This Case? Ideological adjudication violating judicial neutrality Communal bias in religious dispute (deepasthambam–dargah issue) Selective judicial favouritism Violation of: Article 14 (Equality before law) Article 25–28 (Secularism) Basic Structure doctrine Why This Is Constitutionally Sensitive ? Judges are protected by: Security of tenure Difficult removal procedure Purpose: Prevent political intimidation Maintain judicial independence Overuse of impeachment threats can convert judicial accountability into political control. Key Judicial Precedents on Judge Removal Justice V. Ramaswami (1993) – First impeachment attempt, failed due to political abstentions Justice Soumitra Sen (2011) – Rajya Sabha passed removal; judge resigned before Lok Sabha vote Justice J.B. Pardiwala (2018) – Attempt dropped at notice stage No judge has ever been fully removed in India through impeachment so far. But Also: Why Accountability Cannot Be Ignored Judiciary is not above constitutional scrutiny If credible evidence of bias exists, impeachment is: A democratic constitutional remedy Not contempt of court Conclusion The impeachment notice against Justice G.R. Swaminathan reflects a deepening friction between judicial independence and political accountability in communally sensitive cases. While the Constitution permits removal for proved misbehaviour, deploying impeachment in politically charged religious disputes risks: Undermining judicial autonomy Converting constitutional remedies into political weapons The only legitimate path forward lies through: Objective judicial inquiry Due process under the Judges (Inquiry) Act And strict adherence to constitutional morality Gannon’s Storm discovery Why in News? Aditya-L1, India’s first solar observatory, along with six U.S. satellites, has decoded why the May 2024 solar storm behaved abnormally. The storm, also called Gannon’s Storm, showed unexpectedly high geomagnetic impact on Earth. ISRO confirmed for the first time ever: Magnetic reconnection occurred inside a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME). The reconnection region spanned ~1.3 million km (~100× Earth’s size). Discovery made using joint data from: NASA missions: Wind, ACE, THEMIS-C, STEREO-A, MMS DSCOVR (NASA–NOAA joint mission) Relevance GS Paper III – Science & Technology India’s first solar observatory Aditya-L1. Breakthrough in heliophysics: internal magnetic reconnection in CME. Multi-satellite scientific collaboration (NASA–ISRO data fusion). GS Paper III – Disaster Management Space weather as a non-conventional disaster risk. Threat to: Power grids GPS & NavIC Telecom & aviation Basics First: What Is a Solar Storm? A solar storm is a disturbance caused by: Solar flares Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) CMEs: Giant clouds of superheated plasma + magnetic fields Travel at 500–3,000 km/s When CMEs hit Earth: Disturb magnetosphere Cause: Satellite damage GPS errors Radio blackouts Power grid failures Intense auroras What Is a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME)? Massive magnetic “bubble” ejected from the Sun Contains: Charged particles Twisted magnetic field lines (flux ropes) Normally: A single CME interacts with Earth’s magnetic field Severity depends on magnetic orientation (southward = dangerous) What Was Unusual in the May 2024 Storm? 1. Collision of Two CMEs in Space Instead of one CME: Two CMEs collided mid-space Result: Intense compression of magnetic fields Triggered violent internal magnetic reconnection 2. Magnetic Reconnection Inside the CME (First-Ever Direct Evidence) Magnetic reconnection: Process where: Twisted magnetic field lines snap Rejoin in new configurations Release enormous energy Earlier belief: Reconnection mainly occurs: On the Sun Near Earth’s magnetosphere New discovery: It occurred inside the CME itself during transit 3. Scale of the Reconnection Size of reconnection zone: ~1.3 million km ~100 times the diameter of Earth Scientific significance: Largest reconnection region ever observed inside a CME Why Did This Make the Storm More Dangerous? CME collision caused: Sudden reversal of magnetic fields Effects: Stronger coupling with Earth’s magnetosphere Higher: Geomagnetic storm intensity Ionospheric disturbances Satellite drag Power grid stress Role of Aditya-L1 (India’s Strategic Edge) Payloads used: Magnetometers Plasma analysers Solar wind detectors Contribution: Provided precise 3D magnetic field mapping Enabled localisation of the reconnection zone This marks India’s: Entry into hard-core space weather physics Leadership in real-time solar monitoring Strategic Importance for India Protects: NavIC Defence satellites Power grids Telecom & internet Reduces dependence on: U.S. and EU space weather alerts Supports: Human spaceflight (Gaganyaan) Lunar and interplanetary missions Global Scientific Significance Improves: Prediction models of CME evolution Early warning systems for: Aviation Military communication Stock exchanges Validates: Multi-satellite cooperative heliophysics Link with Global Space Weather Preparedness Major past disruptions: Carrington Event (1859) – Telegraph systems failed Quebec blackout (1989) – 9-hour grid collapse May 2024 storm confirms: Modern digital civilisation is highly vulnerable to solar extremes Conclusion The Aditya-L1–led discovery of internal magnetic reconnection during the May 2024 CME collision marks a paradigm shift in heliophysics. It establishes that: CMEs are not magnetically stable objects Their internal dynamics can amplify storm intensity mid-journey For India, this transforms Aditya-L1 from: A scientific mission → a strategic national security asset SURYAKIRAN-XIX Why in News? The 19th edition of the India–Nepal Joint Military Exercise “SURYAKIRAN-XIX” concluded at Pithoragarh. The validation phase was jointly witnessed by the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of: Indian Army Nepal Army The exercise focused on: Counter-terrorism operations Intelligence-based surgical missions High-altitude and complex terrain warfare Tactical validation aligned with Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter. The DGMOs planted a “Tree of Friendship”, symbolising deepening strategic trust. Relevance GS II – International Relations India–Nepal defence diplomacy. Military ties amidst Nepal’s strategic balancing (India–China factor). Border security cooperation. Military confidence-building measures (CBMs). GS III – Internal Security Counter-terrorism interoperability. High-altitude warfare capability (Himalayan security context). Tactical alignment with UN Chapter VII mandates. What Is Exercise SURYAKIRAN? SURYAKIRAN is the annual bilateral military exercise between: India and Nepal It is conducted alternately in both countries. It focuses on: Counter-terrorism Humanitarian assistance & disaster relief (HADR) Peacekeeping operations It reflects the unique nature of India–Nepal military ties, rooted in: Open borders Shared recruitment (Gorkha regiments) Historical defence cooperation Blue Corner Notice Why in News? A Blue Corner Notice has been issued against Goa club owners Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra. They are promoters of: Café Cubi Curlies The accused reportedly: Fled to Thailand Background case: A massive fire in a Goa club killed 25 people Interpol issued the Blue Notice at India’s request. Relevance GS Paper II – International Institutions Role and limits of Interpol. Nature of international police cooperation. Difference between Red, Blue & other notices (Prelims favourite). GS Paper III – Internal Security Transnational crime tracking. Fire safety negligence → criminal liability → international escape routes. Extradition as a security tool. Basics First: What Is Interpol? Full form: International Criminal Police Organization Headquarters: Lyon Established: 1923 Members: 195 countries Functions: Facilitates police cooperation Shares: Criminal data Fingerprints DNA records Financial crime info Interpol is NOT a global police force: It cannot arrest directly It only assists national police agencies What Are Interpol Notices? International alerts issued to: Share criminal information Track fugitives Prevent cross-border crime Issued at the request of: A member country Or an international tribunal Circulated to: All 195 member states Colour-Coded Interpol Notices  Notice Purpose Red Notice To locate and provisionally arrest a wanted person for extradition Blue Notice To collect information about a person’s identity, location, activities Green Notice Warning about habitual criminals likely to reoffend Yellow Notice To locate missing persons, especially children Black Notice To identify unidentified dead bodies Orange Notice Warning about imminent threats (terror, biological, chemical) Purple Notice Modus operandi of criminals, tools, concealment methods Silver Notice Used for financial crimes and asset tracing UN Special Notice For persons sanctioned by UN Security Council What Is a Blue Corner Notice?  Purpose: To trace a suspect’s location To gather: Identity details Travel history Criminal background It is used when: Person is not yet formally charge-sheeted Or arrest is not yet approved It DOES NOT authorise arrest It is: An intelligence-gathering tool A pre-extradition step Difference Between Blue Notice & Red Notice Parameter Blue Notice Red Notice Objective Information gathering Arrest & extradition Legal force No arrest power Provisional arrest allowed Stage Investigation phase Charges proved Use Track & verify Detain & extradite Cyber Slavery Racket in Southeast Asia  Why in News (2024–25) ? ~300 Indians repatriated from Myanmar after being forced to run cyber scams in “scam compounds”. Delhi Police arrested key recruiters of a transnational cyber slavery syndicate. Parallel FIRs and arrests in Gujarat and Haryana. Renewed focus on cross-border human trafficking + cybercrime convergence. What is “Cyber Slavery”? A form of human trafficking for forced cybercrime. Victims: Lured via fake overseas job offers (data entry, hospitality, BPO). Taken abroad on tourist visas. Detained, tortured, and forced to conduct online fraud. Work conditions: 15–18 hours/day Physical assault, emotional abuse Confined to dormitory-style scam compounds When Did Indian Authorities First Take Note? September 2022: Publicly flagged by M K Stalin Reported youth from Tamil Nadu stranded in Myanmar & Southeast Asia. Subsequently, similar cases emerged from: Gujarat Delhi Uttar Pradesh Geographic Hotspots of Cyber Slavery Myanmar Border town Myawaddy = most notorious hub Cambodia Casino cities, especially Sihanoukville Laos Golden Triangle SEZ Structural enablers: Weak law enforcement High casino density Presence of criminal syndicates Post-COVID economic distress Why Did These Countries Become Cyber Slavery Hubs? Post-COVID digital crime boom Legal casinos & online betting provided cover infrastructure Porous borders (especially Myanmar–Thailand) Chinese crime syndicates relocating abroad Cheap captive labour from South Asia High scam profitability using: Crypto fraud Investment scams Romance scams Fake trading platforms Indian Government’s Intervention   Immigration profiling at airports Verification of sponsors and contacts Cyber awareness campaigns Flagging at-risk destinations Embassy-led rescue coordination Key Data Jan 2022 – May 2024: 70,000+ Indian job seekers flagged for Cambodia & Laos 1,500+ Indians rescued mainly from: Myanmar Cambodia Use of Strategic Assets Indian Air Force aircraft deployed for repatriation Rescues conducted in coordination with: Myanmar military (select cases) Local police and immigration authorities Why This is a National Security Concern ? Human trafficking + cybercrime + foreign syndicates Large-scale financial fraud targeting Indian citizens Use of coerced Indians to attack Indian systems Links to: Money laundering Crypto-based terror financing Organised transnational crime Structural Gaps Exposed Weak overseas job regulation Poor digital literacy among youth Lack of real-time international police cooperation Slow mutual legal assistance (MLAT) processes Diplomatic & Legal Dimension Long-term resolution depends on: Bilateral treaties ASEAN-level cybercrime cooperation Extradition agreements Joint task forces

Daily PIB Summaries

PIB Summaries 09 December 2025

Content Gyan Bharatam Initiative STEPS TO CHECK GROUND LEVEL OZONE Gyan Bharatam Initiative Why in News? Written reply in Lok Sabha by Gajendra Singh Shekhawat Update on: Progress of digitisation (3.5 lakh manuscripts) Funding approval of ₹491.66 crore MoUs with 31 institutions Launch of Gyan Bharatam Digital Web Portal Adoption of Delhi Declaration (Gyan Bharatam Sankalp Patra) Relevance GS I – Indian Culture & Heritage Conservation of ancient manuscripts as tangible heritage Transmission of: Vedic knowledge Ayurveda Philosophy Astronomy & mathematics Integration of tangible + intangible heritage (manuscripts + performing arts like Odissi, Sambalpuri) What is the Gyan Bharatam Initiative? Flagship mission of the Ministry of Culture Announced in Union Budget 2025 (Para 84) Objective: Survey Document Conserve Digitize Disseminate India’s manuscript heritage Target Coverage: Over 1 crore manuscripts Core Output: Creation of a National Digital Repository Powered by AI and advanced digital technologies Financial & Administrative Framework Approved Outlay: ₹491.66 crore Time Period: 2025–2031 Approved by Standing Finance Committee (SFC) Pan-India implementation model Institutional Structure & Implementation Architecture Total MoUs Signed: 31 institutions 19 Cluster Centres 12 Independent Centres Technology partners finalized nationwide Example: MoU with Dr. Harisingh Gour University, Sagar (MP) Five Core Verticals of Gyan Bharatam Survey & Cataloguing Identification and metadata mapping of manuscripts Conservation & Capacity Building Physical preservation + training of conservators Technology & Digitization High-resolution scanning + AI tagging Linguistics & Translation Multi-script deciphering and translations Research, Publication & Outreach Academic integration and public dissemination Progress Achieved  Manuscripts digitized so far: ~3.5 lakh National Digital Web Portal launched by the Prime Minister Technology deployment underway across all centres Delhi Declaration (Gyan Bharatam Sankalp Patra ) Recognizes manuscripts as: “Living memory of Indian civilization” Key Commitments: Large-scale digital public access Modern conservation practices Revival of traditional knowledge systems People-centric approach: Converts heritage preservation into a Jan Andolan Global ambition: Positions India as a global hub for manuscript-based learning Cultural Ecosystem Linkages (Odisha Example) Sangeet Natak Akademi Promotes Odissi Dance, Odissi Music, Sambalpuri Dance Confers: Sangeet Natak Akademi Award Ustad Bismillah Khan Yuva Puraskar Eastern Zonal Cultural Centre (EZCC), Kolkata Promotes folk traditions of eastern India Regular showcasing of Sambalpuri Dance This highlights integration of tangible (manuscripts) and intangible (performing arts) heritage under MoC’s broader cultural strategy. Significance of Gyan Bharatam Civilizational & Knowledge Impact Preserves: Vedas, Smritis, medical texts (Ayurveda), astronomy, mathematics, philosophy Counters: Knowledge erosion due to decay, neglect, and private hoarding Digital India & AI Synergy AI-based: Script recognition Translation Metadata tagging Aligns with: Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) vision Soft Power & Global Scholarship Strengthens: India’s civilizational diplomacy Global Indology and Indic studies ecosystem Employment & Skill Building Creates demand for: Archivists Linguists Conservators Digital curators Challenges & Limitations Fragmented private ownership of manuscripts Multilingual script complexity (Sharada, Grantha, Bhojpuri, Modi, etc.) Shortage of trained conservators Risk of digitisation without contextual interpretation Cybersecurity of heritage data Way Forward Standardized national manuscript metadata framework AI + Human expert hybrid translation models Stronger: Copyright safeguards Community participation Integration with: National Education Policy (NEP 2020) Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS) mission Prelims Facts Nodal Ministry: Ministry of Culture Launch Year: 2025 Budget: ₹491.66 crore Target: 1+ crore manuscripts Digitised so far: ~3.5 lakh Centres: 31 (19 Cluster + 12 Independent) Portal: Gyan Bharatam Digital Web Portal Vision Document: Delhi Declaration (Sankalp Patra) STEPS TO CHECK GROUND LEVEL OZONE Why in News? Written reply in Lok Sabha by Kirti Vardhan Singh Issue addressed: Control of Ground-Level Ozone (O₃) pollution Compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Data source: Real-time air quality monitoring from Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) Portal Relevance GS I – Human Geography & Environment Impact of: Urbanisation Heat waves Industrial clusters Link between: Climate change and ozone intensification Crop damage and public health vulnerability GS III – Environment, Technology & Internal Policy Emission control through: BS VI norms Thermal power plant NOx standards Vapour Recovery Systems (VRS) Electric mobility push: PM E-DRIVE PM e-Bus Sewa Waste management as air pollution control VOC regulation in: Paint, pharma, fertilizer industries What is Ground-Level Ozone? Type: Secondary air pollutant Not emitted directly Formed by photochemical reaction between: NOx (Nitrogen Oxides) VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds) In the presence of sunlight Health & Environmental Impact Triggers: Asthma, bronchitis, lung inflammation Damages: Crops, forests, and materials Unlike stratospheric ozone: Ground-level ozone is harmful Sources of Ozone Precursors (A) NOx Sources Coal, petrol, diesel combustion Power plants Motor vehicles Industrial furnaces & boilers (B) VOC Sources Fuel evaporation Solvents, paints Oil & gas production Biomass and wood burning Regulatory Framework NAAQS covers 12 pollutants including O₃ Monitoring through: CPCB’s Central Control Room Portal Ozone precursor control under: Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change Key Government Measures to Control Ground-Level Ozone Vehicle Emission Control – BS VI Norms (Since April 2020) Vehicle Type NOx Reduction 2-wheelers 70–85% 4-wheelers 25–68% Heavy vehicles ~87%   Transition from BS-IV to BS-VI is one of the most decisive ozone-control interventions Electric Mobility Push PM Electric Drive Revolution (PM E-DRIVE) PM e-Bus Sewa Impact: Zero tailpipe NOx & VOC emissions Direct reduction in urban ozone formation National Clean Air Programme (NCAP) – 2019 Target: 130 non-attainment & million-plus cities Coverage: 24 States/UTs Each city has: City-Specific Clean Air Action Plan Sources targeted: Road dust Vehicle emissions Waste burning Construction & demolition Industrial pollution Industrial Emission Standards for NOx & VOCs Revised/introduced for: Man-made fibre Fertiliser industry Pharmaceuticals Paints & coatings Special focus on: Coal/lignite-based thermal power plants Cement plants Industrial boilers & furnaces Standalone clinker grinding units Vapour Recovery System (VRS) at Petrol Pumps 100% coverage in Delhi-NCR Other cities: 100 KL/month sales → million-plus cities   300 KL/month sales → cities above 1 lakh population   Prevents: Fuel evaporation = VOC reduction Transport & Urban Measures Promotion of: Public transport Road infrastructure Strengthening of: Pollution Under Control (PUC) certification regime Waste & Biomass Burning Control Complete ban on: Biomass burning Garbage burning Enforcement of: Solid waste rules Bio-medical waste rules Hazardous waste management rules Ozone-Depleting Substances (ODS) Control (Global Link) ODS Rules, 2000 notified by MoEF&CC Controls: Use Import Export of ODS Aligns India with: Montreal Protocol obligations Though ODS affects stratospheric ozone, it strengthens India’s overall ozone governance framework. Why Ground-Level Ozone is a Rising Policy Challenge ? Climate change increases: Heat waves → faster ozone formation Urbanization: Vehicle density → NOx surge Industrial VOC overload in: Paint, pharma, chemical clusters Poor compliance in: Smaller non-attainment cities Effectiveness Assessment (Critical Analysis) Strengths BS VI norms → Structural emission shift NCAP → National coordination for cities VRS → Direct VOC leakage control Power plant NOx standards → Base-load emission control Gaps Poor VOC emission inventory at city level Limited real-time ozone forecasting Weak enforcement in Tier-2 & Tier-3 cities Inadequate public awareness of ozone as a pollutant Way Forward City-level: Ozone Action Plans Expand: Continuous O₃ monitoring stations Strengthen: VOC-specific compliance audits Integrate: Urban heat mitigation with ozone control Promote: Low-VOC industrial materials Prelims Facts Ground-level ozone → Secondary pollutant Precursors → NOx + VOC + Sunlight BS VI rollout → April 2020 NOx cut: Heavy vehicles → ~87% NCAP launch → 2019 NCAP cities → 130 VRS → Petrol vapor VOC control ODS Rules → 2000

Daily Editorials Analysis

Editorials/Opinions Analysis For UPSC 09 December 2025

Content IndiGo crisis is a classic case of corporate negligence Democracy’s Paradox & the “Chosen” People of the State IndiGo crisis is a classic case of corporate negligence Why in News? Widespread flight delays, cancellations, and network collapse across IndiGo’s domestic operations. Triggered by Flight Duty Time Limitation (FDTL) rule changes effective June 1, aimed at pilot fatigue mitigation. Exposed systemic failures in airline scheduling, crew management, and accountability. Brought back focus on: Corporate governance in private airlines Passenger rights Regulatory enforcement by DGCA. Relevance GS II – Governance & Regulation Role of aviation regulator (DGCA) Regulatory compliance and enforcement deficit Consumer protection and passenger rights Executive accountability in infrastructure services GS IV – Ethics (Applied Ethics & Corporate Governance) Corporate negligence vs duty of care Automation vs human accountability Ethics of apology without compensation Public trust and institutional credibility Practice Question   Market leadership increases responsibility, not immunity. In this context, critically analyze the corporate governance failures exposed by the IndiGo crisis. (250 words) What Is the IndiGo Crisis? IndiGo: India’s largest airline with ~60% domestic market share. FDTL Rules: Safety regulations defining: Maximum flying hours for pilots Mandatory rest periods New FDTL reduced: Daily flight times Back-to-back duty windows IndiGo continued operating with old, overstretched scheduling models, assuming pilots would “adjust”. Result: Crew shortages Crew going “out of compliance” mid-operations Last-minute flight cancellations System-wide cascading failures. Core Reason: Not Regulation, But Corporate Negligence 1. Failure of Advance Preparedness DGCA gave 1-year notice before FDTL implementation. Other airlines adjusted: Hiring Simulator capacity Rostering systems IndiGo failed to: Expand training infrastructure Build backup crew reserves Upgrade scheduling algorithms. 2. Digital Over-Reliance Without Human Safeguards Heavy dependence on: AI-driven crew rostering Automated pairing systems No adequate: Standby buffers Manual override capacity. Once a few pilots went “out of FDTL”, the entire network fractured algorithmically. 3. Operational Overstretch Network already flagged as: “Over-scheduled” Operating at peak load with minimal redundancy FDTL rules exposed hidden inefficiencies, not created new ones. 4. Communication and Passenger Management Failure Instead of real-time human engagement: Automated apology messages No on-ground crisis resolution Passengers forced into: 200–300% costlier last-minute alternatives Missed weddings, interviews, medical travel. Economic & Social Cost (Beyond Ticket Refunds) Aviation failures impose: Loss of productivity Business opportunity losses Medical risks Irrecoverable emotional distress Not measurable merely in: Refund amounts Travel credits. Regulatory Dimension (Governance Angle) IndiGo’s behavior highlights: Weak ex-ante compliance culture Overconfidence due to: Market dominance Oligopolistic power Raises questions on: DGCA’s predictive enforcement Penalty sufficiency vs airline size. Corporate Governance & Ethical Failure Dimension Failure Risk Management Ignored predictable regulatory impact Accountability Shifted blame post-crisis Consumer Ethics Automated apologies instead of restitution Business Continuity No operational buffers Transparency Poor passenger communication Structural Issues in Indian Aviation  Ultra-thin profit margins Aggressive capacity expansion without HR depth Shortage of: Trained pilots Simulator infrastructure Algorithm-driven aviation without human redundancy Weak passenger compensation norms compared to EU/UK. Larger Governance Message Automation cannot substitute institutional responsibility. Scale without safety buffers creates systemic fragility. Market leadership increases duty of care, not reduces it. What Should Have Been Done? Phased crew expansion aligned with FDTL Simulator capacity scaling Excess standby crew pools Manual scheduling backups Proactive passenger re-routing partnerships with other airlines Institutional apology + monetary compensation. Conclusion The IndiGo crisis is not a failure of regulation but a failure of compliance culture, corporate ethics, and anticipatory governance in India’s aviation sector. Democracy’s Paradox & the “Chosen” People of the State Why in News? Renewed controversy around: Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls Citizenship verification practices Linkages with NRC–CAA framework Administrative demand for proof of citizenship from voters has revived: Constitutional debate on who decides citizenship The paradox between popular sovereignty and bureaucratic sovereignty. Relevance GS II – Polity & Governance Citizenship law Electoral reforms Role of Election Commission Executive vs judicial power GS IV – Ethics Presumption of innocence Administrative morality Dignity vs procedural rigidity GS I – Society Exclusion, identity, documentation politics Practice Question Critically examine how large-scale citizenship verification exercises challenge the foundational principles of Indian democracy. (250 words) Core Idea in One Line Indian democracy is facing a structural paradox where the sovereign people are being asked to prove their legitimacy to the state they themselves constitutionally created. Basics What Is Citizenship? Legal status that determines: Political rights (voting, contesting elections) Civil rights (equality, protection of law) Indian citizenship is governed by: Articles 5–11 of the Constitution Citizenship Act, 1955 What Is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR)? A house-to-house verification of electoral rolls Originally meant for: Removing duplicates Correcting errors Now expanding into: Demand for documentary proof of citizenship Why Is This Constitutionally Sensitive? Right to vote ≠ Fundamental Right, but: It is the bedrock of democracy Electoral inclusion is tied to: Equality (Article 14) Democratic participation Central Paradox Classical Democratic Theory People are sovereign State derives authority from: Popular consent Government = trustee of the people Present Administrative Reality Bureaucracy now: Demands proof of citizenship Decides who qualifies as “Indian” Result: State judges the people Instead of people judging the state The Paradox Principle Reality People create the State State now verifies the people Citizens are sovereign Bureaucracy exercises final discretion Democracy is inclusive Documentation-driven exclusion emerges Citizenship Adjudication: Legal Problem   No Central Judicial Mechanism for Citizenship India lacks: A national judicial authority to determine citizenship for all Existing mechanisms are: Fragmented Executive-driven Citizenship Act, 1955 – Limitation Empowers government to frame rules But: Does not create mass adjudication procedures Was never designed for: Population-scale verification exercises NRC & CAA Shift the Burden of Proof Citizen now must prove inclusion Failure leads to: Doubtful citizen Foreigner classification Possible detention/exclusion Assam is the Laboratory Key Features NRC updated with: Multiple cut-off dates Complex ancestry documentation Result: Legal insecurity for millions Families split by documentary classification Deeper Issue Citizenship reduced to: Documentary pedigree Instead of: Lived social-political membership Electoral Rolls VS Citizenship Rolls   Dangerous Institutional Conflation Electoral Roll Citizenship Register For voting rights For national membership Administrative list Civil status determination Flexible correction High-risk exclusion   Using electoral rolls to infer citizenship: Collapses two constitutionally distinct domains Democracy VS Bureaucratic Sovereignty  Administrative Power Expansion Lower-level officials effectively decide: Who votes Who belongs This creates: Street-level constitutional authority Consequences Selective exclusion risk Political profiling risk Erosion of: Universal adult franchise Procedural equality Ethical Dimension Core Ethical Conflict Presumption of citizenship vs presumption of suspicion Indian constitutional morality favours: Inclusion Dignity Non-arbitrariness Ethical Failure Points Treating poverty as documentary guilt Converting administrative convenience into: Existential insecurity for citizens Implications for Indian Democracy 1. Political Shrinks the voter base indirectly Weakens mass participation 2. Constitutional Undermines: Article 14 (Equality) Popular sovereignty Expands executive dominance 3. Social Disproportionate impact on: Migrants Poor Illiterate populations Constitutional Balance Citizenship determination must be: Judicially insulated Procedurally humane Electoral inclusion should operate on: Presumption of citizenship unless proven otherwise Bureaucracy should be: An administrator, not a sovereign adjudicator Conclusion When the state begins to question the citizenship of its own electorate at scale, democracy risks transforming from a system of popular sovereignty to one of bureaucratic certification.

Daily Current Affairs

Current Affairs 09 December 2025

Content How can India benefit from neurotechnology? DHRUVA framework Crypto transactions crossed ₹51,000 cr. in 2024-25 in India Nahargarh Biological Park Gallbladder cancer How can India benefit from neurotechnology?  Why in News? May 2024: Neuralink received US FDA approval for first in-human BCI trials. Demonstrated: Thought-controlled cursor movement Prosthetic-enabled motor function in paralysed patients Renewed global debate on: Human enhancement Brain data privacy Military uses of BCIs Parallel developments: China Brain Project (2016–2030) EU & Chile enacting “Neurorights” laws In India: IIT Kanpur developed BCI-driven robotic hand for stroke patients New focus on health-tech + neuro-AI convergence Relevance GS 2 – Governance & Social Justice Health governance and regulation of emerging medical technologies Data privacy, informed consent, and human rights (brain data) International cooperation on tech ethics (neurorights, global regulations) GS 3 – Science & Technology + Internal Security Emerging technologies: Neuro-AI, BCIs, assistive technologies Dual-use technology risks (civil–military fusion, neuro-weapons) Strategic technology competition (US–China–EU) What is Neurotechnology? Neurotechnology = technologies that: Record Monitor Stimulate Modify brain activity directly. Works at the intersection of: Neuroscience Artificial Intelligence Biomedical Engineering Signal Processing Core Technology: Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) BCI = Direct communication pathway between brain and external device Three functional layers: Signal acquisition → EEG or implanted electrodes Signal decoding → AI/ML algorithms Command execution → Prosthetics, cursors, wheelchairs Types of BCIs Non-invasive EEG headsets Safer, less precise Invasive Implanted electrodes High precision, surgical risk What Can BCIs Do? (A) Therapeutic Uses (Current Reality) Paralysis → Neuroprosthetic limb control Parkinson’s → Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Depression → Targeted neural stimulation Stroke → Motor rehabilitation Epilepsy → Seizure detection & suppression (B) Diagnostic Uses Brain disorder mapping Cognitive decline tracking (Alzheimer’s, dementia) (C) Emerging Uses Gaming & immersive VR Cognitive performance tracking Human–AI interaction Global Landscape (A) United States Global leader via NIH – BRAIN Initiative (launched 2013) Focus: High-resolution brain mapping Neuro-AI interfaces Private sector: Neuralink BrainGate Synchron (B) China China Brain Project (2016–2030): Understanding human cognition Brain-inspired AI Neurological disease treatment Strong civil–military fusion angle (C) Europe & Chile First movers in “Neurorights” laws Legal protection for: Mental privacy Cognitive liberty Psychological integrity Why Does India Need Neurotechnology? (A) Public Health Imperative India has one of the world’s largest neurological disease burdens 1990–2019: Stroke became the largest contributor among neurological disorders Major disease load: Stroke Spinal cord injuries Parkinson’s Depression (B) Economic & Strategic Opportunity Neurotechnology sits at convergence of: Biotech AI Medical devices High potential for: Export-oriented med-tech Defence applications Assistive devices market Where Does India Stand Today? (A) Research Institutions National Brain Research Centre Indian Institute of Science – Brain Research Centre (B) Academic Innovation IIT Kanpur: Developed BCI-based robotic hand Target group: Stroke survivors (C) Start-up Ecosystem Dognosis: Uses canine neural signals to detect cancer scent recognition Neuro-AI applied to animal cognition for human diagnostics Strategic Advantages for India Large and genetically diverse population → better clinical datasets Strong base in: AI Electronics Biomedical engineering Expanding: Health-tech startups Make-in-India medical devices Bottom-Line Assessment Neurotechnology is: No longer speculative Clinically viable Strategically sensitive For India: Healthcare transformation tool Next frontier of strategic tech competition Without regulation: Risk of ethical disaster With regulation: Potential global leadership in affordable neuro-health solutions DHRUVA framework Why in News? May 2025: Department of Posts proposed DHRUVA (Digital Hub for Reference and Unique Virtual Address). Government released: Draft amendment to the Post Office Act, 2023 to legally enable DHRUVA. Follows the launch of DIGIPIN (geo-coded location pin system). Policy concerns raised by: Dvara Research on privacy, consent, and urban governance limitations. Relevance GS 2 – Governance E-governance, Digital Public Infrastructure Consent-based data sharing and privacy Urban governance and service delivery Legal gaps in data regulation GS 3 – Infrastructure & Digital Economy Logistics efficiency Platform economy Last-mile service delivery Smart cities and geospatial governance What is DHRUVA? DHRUVA = a proposed Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) for standardised digital addresses. It converts physical addresses into virtual “labels”, similar to: Email IDs UPI IDs Example: Instead of writing a long address → user shares something like amit@dhruva. Core Objective of DHRUVA Standardisation of addresses across platforms Consent-based sharing of address data Service discovery: Identifying what doorstep services are available at a user’s location Improve: Governance Logistics E-commerce delivery Emergency services What is DIGIPIN? Developed in-house by India Post. 10-digit alphanumeric, geo-coded digital pin Coverage: Every 12 square metre block in India Use-case: Rural areas with weak descriptive addressing Precise fallback for: Postal delivery Emergency response How Will DHRUVA Work? DHRUVA ecosystem includes: Address Service Providers (ASPs) Generate proxy address labels Address Validation Agencies (AVAs) Authenticate address authenticity Address Information Agents (AIAs) Handle user consent management Central Governance Entity On the lines of National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) How Will DHRUVA Be Used? (A) Consent-Based Address Sharing Users tokenise addresses, like: UPI tokenises bank accounts User controls: Who can access For how long For what purpose (B) Seamless Address Updating When a person shifts residence: All linked platforms automatically update delivery location. (C) Logistics & Platform Integration Supported platforms: Amazon Uber India Post Gig economy & food delivery platforms Why is DHRUVA Being Framed as DPI? DHRUVA is aligned with India’s DPI model like: Aadhaar → Identity UPI → Payments DigiLocker → Documents DHRUVA → Addresses Features: Public ownership Interoperable Platform-neutral Consent-based data flows Will It Help Urban Governance? (A) Key Concern Highlighted by Dvara Research Addresses in DHRUVA are linked to people, not independently mapped physical structures. Implication: Urban planning requires structure-based data, not merely person-based data. (B) Consent Paradox Since personal data is collected: User consent becomes mandatory. If citizens refuse consent: Datasets become incomplete Result: Weak urban planning Faulty population projections Inaccurate infrastructure mapping (C) Global Best Practice Contrast In most advanced economies: Digital addresses are linked to surveyed buildings Not tied to personal identity This: Eliminates consent dependency Enables richer governance datasets Governance & Legal Challenges No standalone law yet authorising large-scale address data collection Dvara recommendation: Dedicated draft legislation required Key risks: Surveillance through address linkage Profiling via location-based service history Function creep across welfare, policing, taxation Benefits of DHRUVA (If Designed Safely) Faster emergency response Seamless service discovery Reduced address fraud Lower logistics costs Inclusion of rural habitations without formal addresses Key Risks Privacy erosion State surveillance potential Market monopolisation by large platforms Weak anonymisation of geospatial data Exclusion if digital consent infrastructure fails Strategic Bottom Line DHRUVA represents: Next frontier of India’s DPI stack Digital control layer for geography + service delivery However: Without clear legal backing, anonymised structure-mapping, and privacy-by-design: It risks becoming a surveillance-grade address infrastructure Success hinges on: Independent structure mapping Firewalls between identity and location Strong statutory oversight Crypto transactions crossed ₹51,000 cr. in 2024-25 in India’ Why in News? 2024–25: Crypto transaction value in India crossed ₹51,000 crore, registering 41% year-on-year growth. Data shared by the Ministry of Finance in the Rajya Sabha. Government collected ₹511.8 crore as 1% TDS on crypto transactions. Growth trajectory: 2022–23: ₹22,130 crore 2023–24: ₹36,270 crore 2024–25: ₹51,180 crore Relevance GS 3 – Economy Digital economy and fintech expansion Taxation of new asset classes Black money, money laundering, FEMA risks Financial stability and speculative markets GS 2 – Governance & Regulation Regulatory vacuum in crypto-assets Institutional responsibility of the state Global financial governance coordination What is Cryptocurrency? Cryptocurrency = a digital asset based on: Blockchain technology Cryptographic security Decentralised ledger system In Indian law, crypto is classified as: Virtual Digital Asset (VDA) Not legal tender Treated as a taxable asset, not currency What are Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs)? Defined under the Income Tax Act as: Cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ether) Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) Other cryptographic tokens Excludes: Indian digital rupee (e₹) issued by RBI How is Crypto Taxed in India? Legal Basis Introduced under the Finance Act, 2022 Continued under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (retained in I-T Act 2025 framework) Tax Structure 30% flat tax on profits from VDAs No loss set-off allowed 1% TDS on every transaction Deducted at the time of transfer Applies irrespective of profit or loss How Was ₹51,180 Crore Estimated? Government collected ₹511.8 crore as 1% TDS Since: 1% TDS = Total Transaction Value × 0.01 Therefore: Total crypto transaction value = ₹511.8 crore × 100 = ₹51,180 crore What Does the Growth Indicate? Mass retail participation despite: High volatility Strict taxation Indicates: Rising financialisation among youth Shift towards alternative assets Platform-driven crypto trading boom Why Is Crypto Growing Despite Heavy Taxation? Frictions like: 30% flat tax 1% TDS per transaction Yet growth due to: Bull cycles in global crypto markets Ease of app-based crypto trading Narrative of crypto as: Inflation hedge High-risk, high-return instrument Economic Implications for India (A) Revenue Mobilisation Stable non-traditional tax base Predictable TDS inflows (B) Capital Flight Risk Unregulated cross-border transfers Potential FEMA violations (C) Financial Stability Risk High retail exposure to volatile assets No deposit insurance or investor protection Key Policy Challenges Absence of: Dedicated crypto regulator Consumer protection framework Risks: Money laundering Terror financing Tax evasion via foreign wallets Market manipulation Takeaways Crypto in India has moved from: Grey-zone experiment → High-volume taxable asset class The surge to ₹51,000+ crore shows: Effective tax collection But also deep systemic exposure to an unregulated financial instrument Nahargarh Biological Park Why in News? December 8, 2025: A safari vehicle caught fire inside Nahargarh Biological Park, leading to a narrow escape of 15 tourists. The fire started in the engine compartment and spread rapidly. All tourists were evacuated safely by the driver and forest rescue teams. The incident was reported in The Indian Express. It renewed public debate on: Eco-tourism safety Vehicle maintenance accountability Forest fire risks linked with mechanised tourism Relevance GS 2 – Governance Public safety in tourism State accountability Forest department administration Private contractor regulation GS 3 – Environment & Disaster Management Forest fire risks Sustainable eco-tourism Wildlife conservation vs commercial tourism Climate–fire linkages What is a Biological Park & Safari? Biological Park: A protected forest area focused on: Wildlife conservation Environmental education Regulated tourism Wildlife Safari: Controlled movement of tourists via: Buses Open jeeps Supervised by: State Forest Department Legal backing: Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 State eco-tourism rules Nahargarh Biological Park: Located in Jaipur district, Rajasthan, along the Aravalli hill range. Established in 2016 as part of the larger Nahargarh forest landscape. Functions as a biological conservation and eco-tourism park. Developed to: Reduce pressure on city zoos Promote semi-natural habitat-based conservation Falls under the jurisdiction of the Rajasthan Forest Department. What Exactly Happened? A safari bus carrying 15 tourists: Detected smoke while moving inside the park Within minutes, it burst into flames Immediate response: Driver evacuated tourists Forest department rescue team arrived quickly Outcome: Tourists unharmed Vehicle completely destroyed Governance & Regulatory Gaps Exposed No nationally uniform safari vehicle safety code Absence of mandatory: Fire suppression systems Automatic engine cut-off Periodic third-party fitness audits Many safari vehicles: Operated through private contractors Weak maintenance accountability Legal & Judicial Context Forest tourism operates under: Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 State forest rules The Supreme Court of India, in the T.N. Godavarman forest conservation case series, has repeatedly emphasised: Controlled tourism Vehicle regulation in forest zones Prevention of ecological degradation Eco-tourism vs Conservation: The Core Tension States promote safari tourism for: Revenue Employment But unchecked tourism leads to: Infrastructure stress Safety dilution Wildlife disturbance The Nahargarh incident shows: Commercial incentives overtaking precautionary principles Conclusion The Nahargarh safari fire exposes the safety and regulatory vacuum in India’s rapidly commercialising eco-tourism sector, where infrastructure growth has outpaced environmental risk governance. Gallbladder cancer Why in News? December 2025: Investigative public health report highlighted Gallbladder Cancer (GBC) as an “invisible epidemic” in India’s Gangetic belt. Key triggers for national attention: India contributes ~10% of global GBC burden ~70% of patients are women Heavy clustering in: Uttar Pradesh Bihar West Bengal Assam Strong links established with: River pollution Arsenic & heavy metal contamination Weak cancer surveillance Governance issues flagged: Poor environmental enforcement by Central Pollution Control Board Weak monitoring by Central Ground Water Board Limited rural reach of the National Cancer Registry Programme Relevance GS 2 – Governance Public health surveillance failure Environmental governance Cancer as a non-notifiable disease Policy neglect of preventable disease clusters GS 3 – Environment & Health River pollution Heavy metal contamination Environmental cancers Industrial regulation failures Groundwater contamination What is Gallbladder Cancer?  A highly aggressive cancer of the gallbladder Often asymptomatic in early stages Detected mostly at Stage III or IV Medical characteristics: Rapid local spread Early liver and lymph node metastasis Survival: 5-year survival < 10% in advanced disease Why is GBC Concentrated in the Gangetic Belt? Geographic clustering along the Ganga River basin Primary environmental drivers: Arsenic contamination in groundwater Cadmium and lead from industrial effluents Pesticide residues in agriculture Adulterated mustard oil Daily exposure routes: Drinking contaminated groundwater Consuming polluted river fish Cooking with unsafe oils Long latency: Carcinogenic exposure accumulates silently over decades Gendered Burden: Why Women are Disproportionately Affected ~70% of GBC patients are women Contributing factors: Reuse of cooking oil Storage of leftover food without refrigeration Daily exposure to contaminated water during household chores Nutritional deficiencies Delayed health seeking due to: Poverty Patriarchy Limited access to diagnostics Hospital-stage data: At Tata Memorial Hospital, >80% of women present at Stage III/IV Economic & Social Impact Treatment cost: ₹8–12 lakh per patient Consequences: Medical impoverishment Discontinuation of treatment Intergenerational poverty cycles Geographic overlap with: High multidimensional poverty Poor sanitation Gender inequality Governance Failures at the Core (A) Environmental Governance Weak enforcement of: Water pollution laws Industrial effluent norms Continued discharge into rivers Poor remediation of contaminated aquifers (B) Health Surveillance Failure Cancer registries cover <10% of India’s population NCRP relies heavily on: Hospital-based reporting Rural poor remain statistically invisible Why GBC Remains “Invisible” Cancer is not a notifiable disease in India No mandatory cluster reporting Result: Delayed detection of regional spikes No targeted prevention strategy Low political salience despite high mortality What Needs to Change? Make cancer a legally notifiable disease Integrate: Health surveillance with National Clean Ganga Mission Strengthen: Groundwater testing Industrial discharge audits Community-level interventions: Low-cost screening through district hospitals Routine water testing Women-focused awareness campaigns Develop: Gender-sensitive cancer policy Learning from Global Best Practices Bangladesh: National Residue Control Program for seafood Vietnam: Coastal heavy-metal monitoring Philippines: National Residue Monitoring Plan for aquaculture India’s gap: Marine Products Export Development Authority residue control applies only to exports, not domestic fish consumption Public Health Interpretation GBC in the Gangetic belt represents: An environmental cancer epidemic Driven by: Pollution Gender disadvantage Surveillance failure It is: Preventable Detectable early with proper systems Politically neglected Takeaway Gallbladder cancer in the Gangetic belt is: Not a medical mystery It is a governance failure in slow motion The epidemic survives because: Pollution is tolerated Women’s health is deprioritised Cancer is statistically invisible Declaring cancer notifiable is the single most powerful trigger for reform, as: What gets counted → gets governed → gets prevented Conclusion Gallbladder cancer in the Gangetic belt is an environmental, gendered and governance-driven epidemic — not of biological inevitability, but of regulatory neglect.

Daily PIB Summaries

PIB Summaries 08 December 2025

Content India’s Solar Momentum Export Promotion Mission India’s Solar Momentum Why in News  ? India’s solar capacity touched ~129 GW, up from 3 GW in 2014 (over 40× growth in 11 years). Non-fossil installed power capacity crossed 50% of India’s total ~500 GW electricity capacity five years ahead of the 2030 target. Massive scale-up recorded under PM Surya Ghar, PM-KUSUM, Solar Parks, and PLI for Solar PV Manufacturing. 8th Assembly of the International Solar Alliance (ISA) hosted by India in Oct 2025, reinforcing India’s global solar leadership. Relevance GS II (Governance, International Relations) Climate diplomacy leadership via International Solar Alliance South–South cooperation through solar finance & capacity building Federal cooperation in renewable energy deployment Energy as a tool of strategic diplomacy (OSOWOG grid vision) GS III (Economy, Infrastructure, Energy, Environment) Energy security: Reduced fossil fuel import dependence Infrastructure: Grid integration at high RE penetration Industrial policy: PLI for Solar PV Manufacturing Agriculture: Solar pumps under PM-KUSUM Circular economy: Solar panel recycling challenge Why Solar Matters for India ? India is: 3rd largest energy consumer globally Among the top 3 CO₂ emitters, though per capita emissions remain low Solar power addresses: Energy security (reduces fossil fuel imports) Climate mitigation (zero operational emissions) Rural electrification Job creation & manufacturing growth High natural advantage: 300+ sunny days/year 4–7 kWh/m²/day solar radiation Strategic shift from coal-dominant mix → renewables-led grid Solar Capacity Growth: Structural Transformation 2014: 3 GW Oct 2025: ~129 GW Growth rate: Over 40-fold increase Now largest contributor to renewable energy, ahead of wind & biomass Share in India’s renewable mix: Solar now forms ~50%+ of total RE capacity Impact: Reduced long-term power costs Improved grid diversification Lower exposure to global fuel price shocks Non-Fossil Power Milestone Non-fossil installed capacity: ~259 GW Total national capacity: ~500 GW Result: >50% electricity capacity from non-fossil Covers: Solar Wind Hydro Nuclear Biomass India achieved its 2030 climate electricity mix target in 2025 itself Global Standing in Renewables (2025) As per IRENA Renewable Energy Statistics 2025: 3rd in solar capacity 4th in wind power 4th in total renewable installed capacity Implication: India is now a system-shaper, not just a follower, in global clean energy markets Policy Anchor: Panchamrit at COP26 Announced at COP26, 2021 Five Pillars: 500 GW non-fossil capacity by 2030 50% power capacity from non-fossil by 2030 (already achieved) 1 billion tonne CO₂ emission reduction by 2030 45% reduction in carbon intensity vs 2005 Net Zero by 2070 Function: Aligns energy policy, industry, transport, urban planning with climate goals Key Government Programmes Powering Solar Expansion A. PM Surya Ghar (Rooftop Solar Revolution) Launch: Feb 2024 Outlay: ₹75,021 crore Target: 1 crore households Benefit: Up to 300 free electricity units/month Status (Dec 2025): 23.9 lakh homes covered 7 GW rooftop capacity installed ₹13,464.6 crore subsidy released Impact: Direct household cost savings Decentralised energy generation Urban & semi-urban grid decongestion B. National Solar Mission (2010) Technology-wise deployment: Ground-mounted: 98.72 GW Rooftop: 22.42 GW Hybrid (solar share): 3.32 GW Off-grid: 5.45 GW Strategic value: Enabled India’s utility-scale solar parks Drove tariff discovery through reverse bidding C. PLI Scheme for Solar PV Manufacturing Implemented by Ministry of New and Renewable Energy Outlay: ₹24,000 crore (Tranche I & II) Manufacturing capacity awarded: ~48.3 GW Investments attracted (Sept 2025): ₹52,900 crore Jobs generated: ~44,400 Significance: Reduces import dependence on China Builds end-to-end domestic solar supply chain Supports Atmanirbhar Bharat in clean tech D. PM-KUSUM (Solarisation of Agriculture) Launched: 2019 Components: A: Grid-connected solar plants on fallow land B: Standalone solar pumps C: Solarisation of grid-connected pumps Status (Oct 2025): ~9.2 lakh standalone solar pumps (B) 10,535 grid solarised pumps (C) 9.74 lakh feeder-level solarised pumps Subsidy: 30–50% CFA up to 15 HP pumps Impacts: Cuts diesel subsidy Boosts farm incomes Supports daytime irrigation E. Solar Parks & Ultra Mega Solar Projects Launched: 2014 Target enhanced: 20 GW → 40 GW Status (Oct 2025): 55 solar parks 39.97 GW sanctioned 14.92 GW already commissioned Benefits: Common infrastructure Faster land acquisition Lower project risks Extended till March 2029 India’s Global Solar Diplomacy International Solar Alliance (ISA) Co-founded by India & France HQ: Gurugram 125+ member countries Functions: Solar finance mobilisation Technology transfer Capacity building Global risk mitigation 8th ISA Assembly (Oct 2025, New Delhi) 550+ delegates, 30+ ministers Focus areas: Resilient solar value chains Inclusive solar access Job creation & women leadership OSOWOG grid integration One Sun, One World, One Grid (OSOWOG) Proposed by India (2018) Vision: Global renewable power interconnection Solar trading across time zones Strategic outcome: Enhances energy security Cuts global storage costs Positions India as a transnational grid leader Strategic Significance of India’s Solar Surge Economic Lower power tariffs Reduced fossil fuel imports Manufacturing-led green growth Environmental Emission intensity reduction Coal displacement Social Rural electrification Farmer income diversification Geopolitical Leadership in climate diplomacy South–South solar cooperation via ISA Critical Challenges Ahead Intermittency & storage adequacy Grid balancing at high RE penetration Land conflicts in ultra-mega parks Recycling & end-of-life solar panels Dependence on imported critical minerals Conclusion: What This Milestone Really Means India is no longer just adding renewables—it is: Restructuring its entire power system Indigenising clean-tech manufacturing Exporting solar governance models globally Crossing 50% non-fossil power capacity in 2025 marks: A historic energy transition point A firm foundation towards 500 GW by 2030 & Net Zero by 2070 Export Promotion Mission  Why in News  ? Government approved the Export Promotion Mission (EPM) with an outlay of ₹25,060 crore (FY 2025–26 to FY 2030–31). Launch announced in Union Budget 2025–26 as a single, unified, digital export-support framework. Implemented through Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT). Backed by: ₹20,000 crore Credit Guarantee Scheme for Exporters Major regulatory relief by Reserve Bank of India (RBI) amid global trade disruptions. Special focus on MSMEs, labour-intensive sectors, tariff-hit sectors and low-export districts. Relevance GS II (Governance, Polity, Federalism) Mission-mode governance replacing fragmented schemes Digital governance through DGFT’s unified export platform Cooperative federalism via district export promotion Role of RBI in economic stabilization Centre–State coordination in trade facilitation GS III (Economy, Trade, MSME, Banking) Export-led growth strategy MSME credit access via ₹20,000 crore credit guarantee Trade finance reforms & interest subvention Logistics cost reduction for interior districts Global value chain integration Why Exports Matter for India ? Exports drive: Manufacturing growth MSME employment Foreign exchange stability Global value-chain integration Key structural issues earlier: Fragmented export schemes High cost of trade finance Logistics disadvantages in interior districts Weak branding & standards compliance among MSMEs EPM responds to the need for: Unified governance Digitally delivered incentives Outcome-based export promotion What is Export Promotion Mission (EPM)? A national, mission-mode export reform framework Outlay: ₹25,060 crore (6 years) Coverage: Merchandise exports Services exports Objective: Strengthen finance, market access, standards, branding, and district-level participation Replaces: Multiple fragmented export-support schemes with one integrated digital architecture Policy Rationale: Why a Mission Approach? Earlier ecosystem suffered from: Overlapping schemes Slow approvals Weak inter-ministerial coordination EPM focuses on: Affordable trade finance Export-quality certification & standards Market access & branding Logistics rebates for interior exporters Designed as: Adaptive to global trade shocks Digitally monitored Outcome-linked Institutional Structure & Governance Nodal Implementing Agency: DGFT Key Stakeholders: Department of Commerce Ministry of MSME Ministry of Finance Export Promotion Councils Commodity Boards Financial institutions State Governments Digital Backbone: End-to-end processing Application → Approval → Disbursal Integration with customs & trade systems Governance Model: Inter-ministerial coordination State partnership Data-driven monitoring Two Core Sub-Schemes Under EPM A. Niryat Protsahan – Financial Enablers Targets export financing constraints, especially for MSMEs. Key Instruments: Interest subvention on: Pre-shipment credit Post-shipment credit Export factoring Deep-tier financing Credit cards for e-commerce exporters Collateral support for export loans Credit enhancement for: New exporters High-risk markets Impact: Lowers cost of capital Expands credit access Encourages first-time exporters B. Niryat Disha – Non-Financial Enablers Targets market-readiness and competitiveness. Key Supports: Testing, certification & compliance International branding & packaging Trade fairs, expos & buyer-seller meets Export warehousing & logistics Inland transport reimbursement (for remote districts) Cluster-level & district export facilitation Impact: Bridges quality and branding gap Integrates Indian MSMEs into global market standards Expands exports from non-coastal and low-export districts Sectoral & Regional Focus Priority sectors: Textiles Leather Gems & Jewellery Engineering goods Marine products Target groups: MSMEs First-time exporters Labour-intensive industries Regional thrust: Interior districts Low-export-intensity regions Strategic intent: Geographic diversification of exports Reduce coastal concentration Credit Guarantee Scheme for Exporters (CGSE) Approved alongside EPM Additional credit support: ₹20,000 crore Implemented by: Department of Financial Services (DFS) National Credit Guarantee Trustee Company Limited (NCGTC) Features: 100% Government of India guarantee Collateral-free export credit Additional working capital up to 20% of sanctioned limits Valid till 31 March 2026 Objective: Liquidity assurance Market expansion support Risk mitigation for lenders RBI Regulatory & Liquidity Support (Nov 2025) Issued as “Trade Relief Measures Directions, 2025” (i) Moratorium on Repayments Applicable: 1 Sept – 31 Dec 2025 Simple interest, no compounding Interest convertible into Funded Interest Term Loan (FITL) (ii) Export Credit Tenure Extension Pre & post-shipment credit tenure extended to 450 days Applies to credit disbursed up to 31 March 2026 (iii) Working-Capital Flexibility Drawing power recalculation Margin reduction & reassessment permitted (iv) Regulatory Forbearance Relief period excluded from DPD Not treated as restructuring No adverse impact on credit bureau records (v) Provisioning Requirement Minimum 5% general provision on eligible standard accounts (vi) FEMA Relaxations Export realisation period extended 9 → 15 months Advance payment shipment window extended 1 → 3 years Macro Impact: Prevents NPA stress Preserves export liquidity Stabilises trade during global slowdown Digital Implementation & Monitoring DGFT operates: Unified exporter database Automated approvals Scheme-wise benefit tracking Features: Paperless processing Real-time monitoring Outcome-based fund release Policy Advantage: Reduces transaction cost Improves transparency Speeds up exporter onboarding Expected Outcomes of EPM Improved access to affordable export finance Higher compliance readiness for global standards Enhanced branding & international visibility Increased exports from: Non-traditional districts First-time exporters Employment generation in: Manufacturing Logistics Services Supports: Atmanirbhar Bharat Export-led growth model Viksit Bharat @ 2047 vision Strategic Significance Converts India’s export policy from: Fragmented schemes → Mission-mode governance Strengthens: Trade finance ecosystem MSME global integration District-level export capacity Aligns with: Industrial corridor development Gati Shakti logistics reforms Digital public infrastructure Key Risks & Challenges Global demand slowdown Tariff protectionism in developed markets MSME compliance cost burden Logistics bottlenecks in remote districts Banking risk aversion despite guarantees Conclusion   The Export Promotion Mission (EPM) represents a structural reform in India’s export governance. By integrating: Digital delivery (DGFT) Credit guarantees (NCGTC) Monetary relief (RBI) Financial & non-financial enablers (Niryat Protsahan & Disha) It creates a whole-of-government export ecosystem focused on: MSME empowerment Market diversification Trade resilience EPM operationalises India’s shift towards technology-driven, inclusive and globally competitive exports.

Daily Editorials Analysis

Editorials/Opinions Analysis For UPSC 08 December 2025

Content Surveillance apps in welfare, snake oil for accountability A black Friday for aviation safety in India Surveillance apps in welfare, snake oil for accountability Why in News? July 2025 circular of the Union Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) officially acknowledged large-scale misuse and manipulation of the NMMS app in MGNREGA. Despite this failure, the Ministry of Women and Child Development (MoWCD) made Facial Recognition Technology (FRT) mandatory for Take Home Rations (THR) under Poshan Tracker. Renewed policy debate on tech-based surveillance for accountability in welfare delivery. Linked to rising concerns on: Exclusion errors Privacy violations Worker demotivation Digital authoritarianism in welfare governance Relevance GS II (Governance & Social Justice) Digital governance and welfare delivery Role of technology in public service delivery Exclusion errors in PDS, MGNREGA, ICDS Accountability vs responsibility in administration Cooperative federalism at the grassroots Institutional trust and state–citizen relations GS IV (Ethics in Public Administration) Accountability vs moral responsibility Means–ends inversion in governance Ethics of care vs algorithmic compliance Surveillance ethics and human dignity Demoralisation of frontline workers Practice Question “Digital surveillance has increasingly replaced administrative accountability in India’s welfare delivery system.” Critically examine with examples from MGNREGA and ICDS.(250 Words) Core Concept: Accountability vs Responsibility Accountability External enforcement: making people do what authorities want. Based on surveillance, monitoring, threat of penalties. Responsibility Internal motivation to act in public interest. Emphasised by Jean Drèze and Amartya Sen (2025): True governance reform requires norms, ethics, and intrinsic motivation, not only surveillance. Evolution of Tech-Fixes for Accountability 1. Biometric Attendance (Early 2010s) Introduced to curb: Absenteeism Late arrival Early exit RCT Evidence (Rajasthan): Long-run attendance actually declined among government nurses. Jharkhand (Khunti Block): Staff focused on marking biometrics, not on actually completing work. Structural Failure: Output displaced by input monitoring. 2. Aadhaar-Based Biometric Authentication (ABBA) in PDS (2017) Objective: Prevent identity fraud in ration distribution. Consequences: Exclusion of elderly, disabled, immobile persons Dependence on neighbours disallowed. Dealer manipulation: Full biometric authentication but short-weight rations (4.5 kg vs 5 kg). Result: “Pain without gain” High transaction cost No real corruption control 3. NMMS App in MGNREGA (2022) Requires: Geo-tagged photographs of workers twice daily Intended Goal: Eliminate fake muster rolls. Ground Reality: Uploading: Random photographs Photographs of photographs Irrelevant jpeg files July 2025 MoRD Circular: Lists 7 types of manipulation practices Government response: 100% daily verification of all photos across Gram Panchayats → Administrative overload. 4. Facial Recognition Technology (FRT) in Poshan Tracker (THR) Applied to: Pregnant women Lactating mothers Children Requires: Live blinking photo for ration authentication Field Reality (Nuh, Haryana): Connectivity issues Crowd management failures Angular Workers admit: “Those who want to cheat will continue” 5. Surveillance on ANMs & Anganwadi Workers Mandatory: Geo-tagged photos for: Breastfeeding counselling Home visits Perverse Incentives: Photo without counselling → Safe Counselling without photo → Punishable Andhra Pradesh Tribal Area Case: ANM penalised for moving 300 metres to get network to upload data. Result: Demoralisation of sincere workers Shift from service to compliance Structural Failures of Tech-Based Accountability Monitoring focuses on presence, not performance Corruption adapts faster than regulation Digital compliance replaces real service delivery Honest workers penalised; dishonest ones innovate Surveillance increases transaction time in welfare delivery Six Major Systemic Harms Created by Tech-Fixes Exclusion Errors PDS: elderly, disabled excluded due to biometric failure MGNREGA: workers excluded if NMMS photos fail to upload Inefficiency PDS & THR distribution slows due to repeated authentication New Corruption Channels Fake ABBA failures Fake NMMS uploads Brokered authentication Privacy Violations Uploading photographs of breastfeeding mothers Facial data without meaningful consent Identity Fraud Recycling old images Proxy photos Worker Demotivation Surveillance-induced stress Punishment for network failures Loss of professional dignity Political Economy Angle: Capture by Tech Vendors Massive public expenditure on: Smartphones for frontline workers e-POS machines Servers, cloud storage Data consumption Authentication infrastructure Creation of: Guaranteed captive markets for surveillance-tech firms Parallel drawn with: Tobacco industry Refined sugar industry Both: Cultivated ignorance about harms to delay regulation Conceptual Framework: Agnotology Introduced by Robert Proctor Meaning: Systematic production of ignorance Deliberate ignoring of known failures Applied here as: Government acknowledges NMMS misuse Yet expands FRT mandates Indicates institutionalised wilful blindness Governance Diagnosis India’s digital governance has shifted from: Trust-based welfare → Surveillance-based welfare The state now assumes: Citizens are default potential cheats Frontline workers are default suspects This directly undermines: Social capital Institutional trust Cooperative federalism at grassroots Ethical & Constitutional Dimensions  Article 21: Right to dignity infringed by intrusive surveillance Data Protection Principles: Violated via mass biometric capture Ethics of Care: Reduced to algorithmic compliance Means–Ends Inversion: Technology becomes the goal, welfare becomes secondary Key Scholarly Insight Drèze–Sen Thesis (2025): Accountability can enforce obedience. Responsibility alone sustains ethical public service. Tech-fixes cannot: Build integrity Build empathy Build service motivation Conclusion Tech-based surveillance in welfare has: High fiscal cost Low governance return Severe ethical violations It: Does not eliminate corruption Merely digitises corruption Without: Work culture reform Administrative leadership Social norm transformation → Accountability mechanisms remain mechanical, brittle, and counterproductive. In this sense, tech-fixes for accountability function as policy “snake oil”. A black Friday for aviation safety in India  Why in News? December 5, 2025: After large-scale flight cancellations by IndiGo, The Civil Aviation Minister placed Flight Duty Time Limitation (FDTL) rules under abeyance. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) appealed to pilots to dilute compliance with FDTL. This move: Suspended a safety regulation mandated by the judiciary. Directly subordinated passenger safety to commercial continuity. Triggered a national debate on: Crew fatigue Regulatory capture Weak aviation safety oversight in India Relevance GS Paper II (Polity & Governance) Regulatory capture and policy subversion Executive interference in independent regulators Judicial inconsistency and regulatory uncertainty Conflict of interest in aviation governance Right to Life (Article 21) and state obligation GS Paper III (Infrastructure, Transport & Safety) Civil aviation safety standards Regulatory framework of DGCA & ICAO Impact of poor aviation governance on economic infrastructure Crew fatigue as a systemic safety risk Crisis management failure in transport sector Practice Question “Regulatory capture weakens public safety in critical infrastructure sectors.” Analyse this statement in the context of India’s civil aviation sector.(250 Words)  Core Issue in One Line Commercial interests of airlines overrode legally mandated aviation safety norms, creating systemic risk to pilots and passengers. What is FDTL? Flight Duty Time Limitation (FDTL) regulates: Maximum flying hours Duty periods Mandatory rest hours for pilots and cabin crew Objective: Prevent fatigue-induced human error, a leading global cause of air accidents. Issued as a Civil Aviation Requirement (CAR) under DGCA’s regulatory powers. Historical Background of Dilution 2007: DGCA issued a robust CAR on crew fatigue and rest. 2008: Airline owners protested. Ministry ordered DGCA to keep the CAR in abeyance. Bombay High Court (Writ Petition 1687 of 2008): Condemned the move. Observed: “Safety of flights has been overlooked for protecting financial interests of a few operators.” Pilot shortage must be addressed by reducing flights, not increasing duty hours. Irony: The same court later upheld the Ministry’s dilution. Continuity of policy failure: The same commercial-first mindset persists in 2025. Immediate Cause of the 2025 Aviation Crisis New FDTL regulations were to come into force on November 1, 2025. Both: IndiGo management, and DGCA Knew the deadline for over one year. Yet: Crew shortage was not addressed. Mass flight cancellations followed. Result: Thousands of stranded passengers Only ticket refunds offered No compensation for hotels, missed connections, or economic losses Regulatory Loophole: CAR 2022 on Crew Strength DGCA CAR Series ‘C’ Part II Section 3 (April 19, 2022): Minimum 3 sets of crew per aircraft. Actual safety requirement: Domestic: Minimum 6 pilot sets per aircraft Wide-body long-haul: 12 pilot sets per aircraft Airlines: Legally complied with the minimum CAR, But violated fatigue safety principles. Outcome: Deliberate under-employment of crew IndiGo identified as a major beneficiary of this dilution Regulatory Failure: DGCA as a Captured Regulator DGCA actions on December 5, 2025: Morning: Appeals to pilots to cooperate with airlines. Afternoon: CAR on FDTL placed under abeyance by Ministry. Indicates: Loss of regulatory autonomy Political and corporate pressure overriding safety science Classic case of: Regulatory capture Where regulator serves industry, not public safety. International Warning Ignored: ICAO Audit In 2006, International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) audit recommended: India must establish an independent civil aviation authority. DGCA should not function as a department under Ministry control. 20 years later (2025): India still lacks: Independent aviation regulator Functional safety firewall between government and airlines Result: Airlines operate with impunity DGCA acts as a puppet regulator Safety Consequences & Accident Record Major crashes since 2010: Mangaluru Kozhikode Ahmedabad (AI-171) Ahmedabad AI-171 crash investigation: Findings allegedly delayed by the Ministry Despite repeated disasters: No systemic reform of fatigue regulation No accountability of airline owners No institutional strengthening of DGCA Key Ethical & Governance Failures 1. Violation of Right to Life (Article 21) Passenger and pilot safety compromised by: Forced fatigue Commercial scheduling pressure 2. Conflict of Interest Ministry acts as: Promoter of aviation growth And supposed safety guardian This dual role leads to systemic bias in favour of airlines. 3. Judicial Inconsistency Initial High Court protection of safety Later reversal enabling dilution Creates regulatory uncertainty and moral hazard Political Economy of the Crisis Airlines maximise: Aircraft utilisation Revenue per crew Government prioritises: Aviation sector optics Stock market confidence Public safety becomes: Externality transferred to passengers and pilots Why This is a Structural, Not Episodic Failure ? Repeated pattern since 2007: Safety CAR issued → Airlines protest → Ministry intervenes → DGCA dilutes Institutional lesson: India’s aviation governance operates on commercial dominance, not safety primacy International Norm vs Indian Practice Parameter Global Best Practice India (2025) Regulator Independent aviation authority Ministry-controlled DGCA Fatigue norms Non-negotiable Routinely diluted Crew strength Conservative safety buffer Minimum legal threshold Crisis handling Capacity reduction Rule suspension Final Governance Diagnosis Indian aviation currently operates in a state of: Rule suspension in emergencies Corporate-first policymaking Weak institutional checks The December 5, 2025 actions: Prove that aviation safety remains subordinate to airline profitability Convert safety regulation into adjustable commercial tools Conclusion The suspension of FDTL norms to rescue airline operations represents a dangerous shift from “safety as a constitutional obligation” to “safety as a negotiable cost”, validating long-standing ICAO warnings and exposing the structural fragility of India’s aviation governance.

Daily Current Affairs

Current Affairs 08 December 2025

Contents Pension Reforms in India Swap app mandates for digital literacy Draft ISI Bill, 2025 Brain-Stem Death (BSD) National intelligence grid gains traction as Central agencies, police scour for information Filaments Pension Reforms in India WHY IN NEWS ? India’s elderly population (60+) is 153 million today, projected to reach 347 million by 2050. Over 88% of senior citizens work in the informal sector with no assured pension or social security. Renewed focus due to: Expansion and redesign of Atal Pension Yojana and National Pension System, Launch of e-SHRAM portal, Labour Codes reform redefining “wages” for pension calculations. LASI Survey (2017–18) and Comprehensive Annual Modular Survey (2022–23) reveal: 42% of people above 55 unaware of NPS. 63% of elderly lack basic internet usage skills. Relevance : GS Paper II – Governance & Social Justice Welfare schemes for the vulnerable sections (elderly, informal workers) Social security architecture: IGNOAPS, NPS, APY, e-SHRAM Role of Labour Codes in redefining wage-linked social protection Digital exclusion and governance delivery gaps Institutional mechanisms for old-age welfare GS Paper I – Indian Society Demographic transition and population ageing Informalisation of labour and its social consequences Gendered vulnerability in old-age employment GS Paper III – Indian Economy Household savings and capital market deepening Pension funds as long-term infrastructure financing source Fiscal sustainability of OPS vs contributory pensions BASICS: WHAT IS A PENSION SYSTEM? Pension = Regular post-retirement income for old-age security. Two broad types: Social Assistance (Non-contributory) → Government-funded. Contributory Pension → Individual + employer/government contribution. INDIA’S DEMOGRAPHIC & STRUCTURAL CHALLENGE Rapid ageing + Informalisation: Informal sector share among 55+: Women: 75.6% Men: 68% Consequence: No employer pensions. No assured retirement income. Continued old-age labour → poverty risk + dignity deficit. FIRST PHASE: WELFARE-BASED SOCIAL ASSISTANCE Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme (1995) Target: BPL elderly (65+) Nature: Non-contributory Role: First national effort to assure minimum old-age income security. Expanded coverage and benefit levels over time. Limitation: Very low pension amount. No linkage to savings or investment behaviour. Old Pension Scheme (Pre-2004) For government employees. Defined benefit; fully state-funded. Problem: Heavy fiscal burden. Unsustainable with rising life expectancy. SECOND PHASE: SHIFT TO CONTRIBUTORY PENSIONS National Pension System (2004) Replaced OPS for new recruits. Features: Defined contribution. Market-linked returns. Applies to: Government employees. Corporate sector workers. Recent reform: NPS 2.0 100% equity option. Multiple Scheme Framework (MSF). Targets young, high-risk investors. Atal Pension Yojana (2015–16) For informal sector workers (18–40 years). Features: Monthly/quarterly/half-yearly contribution. Government guarantees minimum pension. Behavioural impact: Encourages formal savings culture. Improves retirement planning in low-income groups. THIRD PHASE: BRIDGING FORMAL–INFORMAL DIVIDE e-SHRAM portal National database of informal workers. Functions: Registration for welfare schemes. Eligibility discovery. Attempted integration into formal social security. Challenges: Aadhaar–bank–mobile linkage errors. Digital exclusion: 63% elderly cannot use the internet. Risk of exclusion errors > inclusion gains. ROLE OF LABOUR CODES IN PENSION SECURITISATION Uniform definition of wages: Basic pay ≥ 50% of total earnings. Direct impact: Higher: PF contribution, Gratuity, Pension base. Closes employer strategy of inflating allowances to reduce social security burden. POLICY EVOLUTION: SEQUENTIAL LOGIC Stage 1 – Welfare Protection: IGNOAPS, OPS. Stage 2 – Financial Behaviour Change: NPS, NPS 2.0. Stage 3 – Informal Inclusion: APY, e-SHRAM. Current Direction: Data-driven targeting + contributory security. CRITICAL GAPS Awareness deficit: 42% above 55 unaware of NPS. Coverage vs Access mismatch: Availability ≠ Effective utilisation. Digital divide: Elderly excluded from portal-based access. Pension adequacy: APY pension slabs insufficient for inflation-adjusted living. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL SYSTEM Promotes: Long-term household savings. Capital market deepening. Reduced old-age dependency ratio pressure over time. Shifts India: From welfare-centric pension state To participatory, market-linked social security state. Swap app mandates for digital literacy WHY IN NEWS ? The Union government withdrew its directive to mandatorily preload the ‘Sanchar Saathi’ app on every new smartphone after: Civil society backlash Political opposition Objections from digital rights groups The controversy sits at the intersection of: Exploding cyber fraud Expanding state surveillance capacity Right to privacy jurisprudence Relevance GS Paper II – Polity & Governance Right to Privacy under Article 21 and Puttaswamy doctrine Limits of executive power without statutory backing Surveillance vs civil liberties Citizen–State trust in digital governance GS Paper III – Internal Security & Cybersecurity Cyber fraud ecosystem and telecom security Digital arrest scams, OTP frauds, financial cybercrime Platform regulation and behavioural cybersecurity GS Paper IV – Ethics in Public Administration Informed consent and digital coercion Surveillance ethics vs public safety Technological paternalism vs citizen autonomy WHAT IS SANCHAR SAATHI? A telecom safety platform for: Reporting spam and fraud Blocking lost/stolen devices Checking mobile number misuse Operates through: Web portals SMS USSD codes Linked with the Central Equipment Identity Register (CEIR) system. WHAT DID THE WITHDRAWN DIRECTIVE REQUIRE? Mandatory pre-installation on all new smartphones App: Could not be uninstalled Was visible on first boot Would receive over-the-air updates Reportedly sought access to: Phone SMS Location Effect: Transformed a voluntary safety tool into a system-level state surveillance interface CONSTITUTIONAL TEST: K.S. PUTTASWAMY (2017) Under K.S. Puttaswamy vs Union of India, any restriction on privacy must pass: Legality – Backed by law Necessity – No less intrusive alternative Proportionality – Least restrictive method Why the directive failed: Necessity failed: Same objectives already achieved via: Sanchar Saathi portals USSD codes SMS reporting 1909 spam helpline Proportionality failed: Permanent background access ≫ limited, on-demand verification Legality weak: No detailed parliamentary statute authorising forced installation CYBER FRAUD CONTEXT: SCALE OF THE PROBLEM Interpol estimate (2023): $1 trillion global loss due to online financial fraud India witnessing growth in: “Digital arrest” scams Investment frauds OTP-based account takeovers Key constitutional principle: “Serious problem” ≠ automatic justification for mass surveillance EXISTING INDIAN ANTI-FRAUD ECOSYSTEM (ALREADY IN PLACE) Sanchar Saathi + CEIR portals Telecom Regulatory Authority of India ‘DND’ app National 1909 short code for spam/fraud Privacy Warning from DND Experience: Earlier versions required access to: Call logs SMS data Apple blocked it for violating privacy safeguards. Only after system-level redesign was limited access allowed. Sanchar Saathi mandate repeated this mistake at a much larger scale. CYBERSECURITY RISK OF “PRIVILEGED APPS” A privileged, non-removable app: Becomes a high-value target for hackers If compromised: Enables lateral movement across millions of devices Cybersecurity research consensus: Widely deployed system components = single-point failure risks SURVEILLANCE STATE VS BEHAVIOURAL CYBERSECURITY Digital scams succeed through: Fear False authority Psychological manipulation Pure technological surveillance: Does not eliminate human vulnerability Risks normalising permanent monitoring Kenya Study (2023): Generic scam warnings: Did not improve scam detection ability Behaviour change must be: Continuous Culturally adapted Behaviour-specific INDIA’S EXISTING BEHAVIOURAL CYBER AWARENESS MODELS Reserve Bank of India e-BAAT outreach ‘RBI Kehta Hai’ mass media safety campaign Chhattisgarh cybersecurity awareness vans Telangana ‘Fraud Ka Full Stop’ campaign Reported 8% decline in cybercrime Police-bank mobile kiosks in: Tiruchi, Tamil Nadu Other urban centres CORE GOVERNANCE ISSUE Shift from: “What’s there to hide?” to “What’s there to see — and how is it being used?” Citizens treated as: Passive surveillance subjects Instead of: Active cybersecurity participants POLICY WAY FORWARD: THREE-PILLAR MODEL 1. Platform & Network Regulation Mandatory obligations on: Telecom firms Banks FinTech platforms For: Pattern detection Real-time fraud blocking Large-value transaction traceability 2. Robust Citizen Reporting & Redress Seamless: 1930 helpline App-based reporting Time-bound grievance disposal 3. Sustained Digital Public Education Not slogan-based Must be: Continuous Local-language Behaviour-specific Community-led Draft ISI Bill, 2025  WHY IN NEWS ? On September 25, 2025, the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI) released the Draft Indian Statistical Institute Bill, 2025. The Bill seeks to: Convert ISI from a “registered society” into a “statutory body corporate”. The move triggered: Protests by students and faculty Opposition by political parties (TMC, CPI-M) A letter by D. Ravikumar demanding withdrawal. Relevance GS Paper II – Polity, Governance & Federalism Autonomy of Institutions of National Importance Statutory bodies vs registered societies Centre–State relations and cooperative federalism Accountability vs independence dilemma WHAT IS THE INDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE (ISI)? Founded in December 1931, Kolkata by P.C. Mahalanobis. Registered originally under: Societies Registration Act, 1860 Later under West Bengal Societies Registration Act, 1961. Declared an Institution of National Importance (INI) under: Indian Statistical Institute Act, 1959 Academic spread: ~1,200 students 6 centres across India Disciplines: Statistics, Mathematics, Economics, Computer Science, Operations Research, Cryptology, Quality Management. ISI’S STRATEGIC SIGNIFICANCE TO INDIA Backbone of India’s statistical governance architecture. Birthplace of: National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) → foundation of India’s official data ecosystem. Key contribution: Mahalanobis Model → Heavy-industry based planning. Global academic legacy: C.R. Rao S.R.S. Varadhan (Fields Medalist) Often linked with the Bengal Renaissance and scientific institution-building. WHAT DOES THE 2025 BILL PROPOSE? (A) Change in Legal Status From: Registered Society To: Statutory Body Corporate (B) New Governance Architecture Power concentrated in: Board of Governors (BoG) under Section 15. Earlier structure: 33-member Council 10 from ISI community (8 elected faculty, 1 worker, 1 scientific worker) Under 2025 Bill: Zero elected ISI representatives Dominated by Union Government nominees (C) Funding Model Shift Section 29: “Power to generate revenue” Student fees Consultancy Sponsored research Signals a shift towards corporate-style funding model WHY ARE ACADEMICIANS PROTESTING? 1. Loss of Institutional Autonomy Society model allowed: Independent Memorandum & Bye-laws Faculty-driven governance Statutory corporate model: Direct state control via BoG 2. Political Interference in Appointments All appointments routed through: Union Government-controlled BoG Fear of: Ideological capture Loyalty-based hiring over academic merit 3. Threat to Basic Research ISI’s strength: Long-gestation, non-commercial basic research Corporate funding logic: Favours short-term, revenue-generating projects Risks marginalising pure mathematics & statistics 4. Federalism Concerns Bypasses: West Bengal Societies Registration Act Seen as violating: Spirit of cooperative federalism 5. Democratic Deficit Over 1,500 academicians wrote to Rao Inderjit Singh (MoS, MoSPI). Students formed: Human chain protest in North Kolkata (B.T. Road campus). GOVERNMENT’S POSITION Objective: Make ISI a “world-leading institute” by its centenary in 2031. Justification: Four review committees examined ISI. Most recent chaired by R.A. Mashelkar (2020). Recommendations: Governance reforms Academic expansion Global competitiveness CORE POLICY DILEMMA Issue Government View Academicians’ View Legal Status Strong statutory backing Society model protects autonomy Governance Centralised professional management Democratic academic self-rule Funding Diversification via market Commercialisation of research Appointments Uniform national control Political interference risk CONSTITUTIONAL & GOVERNANCE DIMENSIONS Article 19(1)(g): Academic freedom & professional autonomy Federalism: Central law overriding state-registered societies Institutional independence: Similar debates seen in: Universities Regulatory bodies Research councils Deeper risk: Shift from knowledge institutions as public goods To knowledge institutions as corporate entities LIKELY POLITICAL TRAJECTORY Opposition parties: TMC CPI(M) Have vowed to: Oppose Bill if tabled in Parliament. Indicates: Possible Standing Committee scrutiny Legislative confrontation ahead BROADER IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIA Affects: Credibility of India’s statistical system Independence of official economic data Global trust in Indian research institutions Comes at a time when: Data transparency and methodological credibility are already under scrutiny. Brain-Stem Death (BSD) WHY IN NEWS ? Renewed debate on legal ambiguities in Brain-Stem Death (BSD) certification under the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994. India’s deceased organ donation rate remains critically low: India (2023): 0.77 donors per million Spain (2023): 49.38 donors per million ~5 lakh Indians die annually while waiting for organ transplants. Demand rising to: Expand the donor pool Remove legal-bureaucratic bottlenecks Clarify death certification & consent protocols Relevance : GS Paper III – Health Sector & Human Resource Development Public health system capacity: ICU infrastructure & trained transplant coordinators Organ donation as a resource optimisation strategy in healthcare Demand–supply gap in transplants and mortality burden Health system efficiency and end-of-life care management Medical technology, ventilator dependence and ICU rationing WHAT IS ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION LAW IN INDIA? Governed by: Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994 Covers two types of transplants: (A) Deceased Donor Transplant Organs retrieved from a person with certified Brain-Stem Death (BSD). Heart may still beat with ventilator support. Law legally recognises BSD as death. (B) Living Donor Transplant Organ removed from a healthy living person. Needs legal sanction because: Doctors are otherwise prohibited from removing healthy organs. WHAT IS BRAIN-STEM DEATH (BSD)? Defined under the 1994 Act as: “Permanent and irreversible cessation of all functions of the brain-stem.” Brain-stem controls: Breathing Consciousness Vital reflexes BSD = irreversible biological death, even if heart is artificially supported. WHY INDIA’S ORGAN TRANSPLANT PERFORMANCE IS POOR Extreme shortage of: ICU infrastructure BSD-certified hospitals Trained transplant coordinators Major bottlenecks: Legal confusion Bureaucratic controls Family consent delays Low public awareness Result: Massive organ-demand vs supply gap KEY LEGAL CONFUSIONS AROUND BSD Q1. Is BSD legally equivalent to cardiac death? Yes, under the 1994 Act: “Deceased person” includes: Death by brain-stem death Death by cardio-pulmonary failure Core legal phrase: “Permanent disappearance of all evidence of life” Therefore: BSD has full legal recognition as death Q2. Should life support continue if family refuses organ donation? Law: Only defines death Does not dictate post-death hospital actions Ethical-legal position: If no consent: Life support may be continued on family request But death certificate time is final If consent exists: Life support must continue temporarily to preserve organs Q3. Are two death certificates required? Current practice: BSD certificate issued first Fresh death certificate issued after organ harvest Legal position: Unnecessary duplication BSD certificate alone is sufficient for legal death registration LINK WITH DEATH REGISTRATION LAW Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 Definition of death: “Permanent disappearance of all evidence of life.” Same core definition as 1994 Act. Form 4 (Death Registration Form): Separates: Cause of death Mode of death (heart failure, respiratory failure, etc.) BSD is interpreted as: Respiratory failure due to brain-stem damage Conclusion: No new amendment needed to register BSD legally. MAJOR LEGAL CONTRADICTION NEEDING AMENDMENT Section 14(1) of 1994 Act: BSD certification & organ retrieval allowed only in registered hospitals. Rule 5(1) & 5(2): BSD certification mandatory in every hospital with ICU, including: Non-transplant hospitals Provision What it Allows Section 14 Only registered hospitals Rule 5 All ICU hospitals Resulting Contradiction: This legally blocks universal BSD identification. CRITICAL NEED FOR LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENT Reform Required: Allow BSD certification and organ retrieval in all ICU-equipped hospitals. Restrict actual transplant surgery to: Registered transplant centres only. Why Essential: BSD commonly occurs in: Trauma Stroke Brain haemorrhage cases Most such deaths occur in: District hospitals Medical colleges Current law artificially shrinks the donor pool. BUREAUCRATIC BOTTLENECKS IN BSD CERTIFICATION Problem 1: Doctor Approval by Appropriate Authority (AA) Form 10 requires: 2 of the 4 certifying doctors to be AA-approved Issues: No special qualification criteria Cumbersome approval process Doctors reluctant to apply Effect: BSD certification gets delayed or avoided Reform Needed: Allow any registered specialist medical practitioner to certify BSD. Problem 2: No “Time of Death” in Form 10 A death certificate without time = legally incomplete Kerala Government (2020) solved this by: Defining time of death as: “Time when arterial pCO₂ reaches target value in second apnoea test” Other States still lack this clarity. Result: Legal uncertainty in death registration. CONSENT PROCESS: LEGAL SEQUENCING When should consent be sought? As per law: First → BSD must be diagnosed & certified Then only → Family approached for consent Legal tools: Form 8 (Declaration & Consent Form): Starts with: “Has been declared brain-stem dead/dead…” Confirms: Authorisation for organ removal after BSD certification Consent before BSD certification is legally incorrect. POLICY IMPORTANCE OF CLEAR BSD LAW Addresses three national priorities: Public health → Organ availability Medical ethics → End-of-life clarity Resource efficiency → ICU & ventilator optimisation Prevents: Indefinite ventilator occupation Medico-legal hesitation Family-doctor conflict National intelligence grid gains traction as Central agencies, police scour for information WHY IN NEWS ? National Intelligence Grid (NATGRID) is now handling ~45,000 data access requests per month. At the 2024 DGPs’ Conference in Raipur, chaired by Narendra Modi, States were asked to scale up NATGRID usage in all investigations. Union Home Ministry directed States to liberally use NATGRID. Access expanded: From 10 Central agencies To Superintendent of Police (SP)-rank officers in States. Comes amid: 20.41 lakh cybersecurity incidents in 2024 (highest since 2020). Relevance : GS Paper III – Internal Security Counter-terrorism intelligence architecture Cybersecurity incidents and digital infrastructure protection Financial crime, narcotics, terror financing investigations Technology-driven policing GS Paper II – Polity & Governance Federalism in policing (State subject, Central platform) Executive powers, absence of statutory backing Oversight and accountability mechanisms WHAT IS NATGRID? A real-time, secured data access platform for: Police Intelligence agencies Investigative bodies Purpose: To integrate multiple government & private databases Enable fast, intelligence-led investigations Conceptualised in 2009 after the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. Became fully operational in 2023–24. WHAT KIND OF DATA DOES NATGRID ACCESS? NATGRID enables real-time access to: Aadhaar data Driving licence & vehicle registration Airline passenger data Banking & financial transactions Telecom records Social media account metadata This allows multi-dimensional profiling for: Terror cases Financial crimes Narcotics Cybercrime Organised crime WHO CAN ACCESS NATGRID? Earlier Access (Only Central Agencies): Intelligence Bureau Research and Analysis Wing National Investigation Agency Enforcement Directorate Financial Intelligence Unit Narcotics Control Bureau Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Current Expansion: SP-rank State Police officers now included Marks a shift from Central-only intelligence to federal policing integration. WHY WAS NATGRID CREATED? Problem earlier: Agencies had to: Write letters Seek case-specific approvals Wait weeks for data Post-26/11 reform logic: Terror attacks exploited information silos NATGRID solves this by: Providing single-window, integrated access Eliminating: Inter-agency delays Jurisdictional bottlenecks OPERATIONAL ADVANTAGES No FIR required to access data. Enables: “Join-the-dots” investigations Preventive intelligence Financial trail mapping Reduces: Inter-agency dependency Tactical delays Critical for: Terror financing Cryptocurrency fraud Cross-border crime Cyber extortion CURRENT OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES Despite being designed as a real-time system, State police report: Slow login processes Delayed data retrieval Procedural friction Officers still dependent on manual follow-ups Indicates a gap between platform design and field usability. CYBERSECURITY CONTEXT India recorded: 20.41 lakh cyber incidents in 2024 Government concern: Repeated attempts to breach: Power grids Telecom networks Financial infrastructure NATGRID is now positioned as: A core digital internal security backbone GOVERNANCE & POLITICAL CONTEXT Originally conceptualised under P. Chidambaram (2009). Gained full momentum after 2019 under Amit Shah as Home Minister. Key governance change: Central–State trust deficit was resolved Enabled State police onboarding CONSTITUTIONAL & PRIVACY IMPLICATIONS NATGRID directly engages: Article 21 – Right to Privacy Doctrine from: Puttaswamy judgment (Legality, Necessity, Proportionality) Key Risks: Mass surveillance potential Profiling without judicial warrant No FIR requirement dilutes judicial oversight Data misuse risk in political or civil cases Lack of independent audit mechanism Security efficiency ↑ but privacy safeguards remain institutionally weak. FEDERALISM DIMENSION Policing is a State subject. NATGRID: Operates under Union Home Ministry control. Expansion to State police: Strengthens cooperative federalism But: Central platform still controls architecture, access logs, and audit COMPARISON WITH GLOBAL MODELS Country Platform Oversight USA Fusion Centers Strong Congressional + Judicial oversight UK GCHQ–NPCC systems Parliamentary Intelligence Committee India NATGRID Executive-controlled, weak statutory oversight CORE POLICY DILEMMA Security Objective Liberty Risk Faster crime detection Mass data aggregation Preventive intelligence Surveillance without suspicion Unified access Weak data minimisation WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE (REFORM AGENDA) ? Enact a dedicated NATGRID statutory law: Defines: Purpose limitation Data retention period Audit standards Mandatory: Independent oversight authority Judicial access logs Technical reforms: Faster access interfaces Tiered access control Parliamentary reporting on: Annual request volumes Misuse cases Breach audits Filaments WHY IN NEWS ? On December 3, researchers from the University of Oxford reported: Discovery of a ~50 million light-year-long galaxy filament. The filament shows aligned galaxy spins, suggesting that the entire filament itself is rotating. The team claims it may be: “One of the largest spinning structures ever observed in the universe.” This provides direct observational support to predictions made by cosmological simulations. Relevance : GS Paper III – Science & Technology Astrophysics and cosmology Dark matter and large-scale structure of the universe Observational astronomy and simulation-based science GS Paper I – Physical Geography (World Geography Interface) Large-scale structure of the universe Formation of galaxies and cosmic web WHAT ARE COSMIC / GALAXY FILAMENTS? Cosmic filaments are: The largest known structures in the universe. Thread-like formations forming the Cosmic Web. They are composed of: Dark matter Intergalactic gas Galaxies Typical scale: Tens to hundreds of millions of light-years They: Connect massive galaxy clusters Surround vast empty regions called voids STRUCTURE OF THE COSMIC WEB The large-scale universe is arranged into: Filaments → long, thread-like galaxy highways Walls/Sheets → flat, dense galaxy regions Nodes (Clusters) → intersections of filaments Voids → enormous empty regions  Together, these form the Cosmic Web, the universe’s fundamental large-scale architecture. HOW DO COSMIC FILAMENTS FORM? Originates from: Tiny density fluctuations just after the Big Bang Under the influence of gravity: Matter collapses into sheets Sheets intersect → filaments Filaments intersect → clusters Dominant driver: Dark Matter, which provides gravitational scaffolding Ordinary matter (gas + galaxies) follows dark matter distribution. WHY ARE FILAMENTS CALLED “COSMIC HIGHWAYS”? Gas and small galaxies: Flow along filaments toward massive galaxy clusters. This inflow: Feeds galaxy growth Triggers star formation Shapes galactic evolution over billions of years Hence, filaments decide: Where galaxies form How fast they grow How much fresh gas they receive HOW DO ASTRONOMERS DETECT FILAMENTS? By: Mapping positions and distances of thousands of galaxies Using redshift surveys Then: Tracing spatial clustering patterns Supported by: Large-scale computer simulations based on: Lambda-CDM Model of cosmology These simulations reproduce: Filaments, walls, voids, and clusters almost exactly as observed. WHAT EXACTLY DID THE OXFORD TEAM DISCOVER? A ~50 million light-year galaxy filament Traced by: At least 14 galaxies Unique feature: The galaxies’ axes of rotation are aligned with the filament’s direction Interpretation: The entire filament is slowly rotating as a coherent structure WHY IS ROTATION OF A FILAMENT IMPORTANT? Earlier belief: Filaments are static gravitational channels New result shows: Filaments can have large-scale angular momentum This supports: The theory that gravitational infall and tidal forces can spin up even gigantic cosmic structures It links: Galaxy-scale rotation → filament-scale rotation → cosmic-scale dynamics SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE Confirms that: Angular momentum exists at the largest observable scales Strengthens: Theoretical predictions from cosmological simulations Helps explain: Why galaxies in the same filament often show spin alignment Improves understanding of: Structure formation Galaxy evolution Dark matter dynamics IMPLICATIONS FOR COSMOLOGY Validates: The gravitational instability model of structure formation Improves: Precision in large-scale universe mapping Supports: The idea that: The universe evolved from tiny early ripples into a connected cosmic network

Daily PIB Summaries

PIB Summaries 06 December 2025

Content PRADHAN MANTRI FORMALISATION OF MICRO FOOD PROCESSING ENTERPRISES (PMFME) SCHEME THE HEALTH SECURITY SE NATIONAL SECURITY CESS BILL, 2025 PRADHAN MANTRI FORMALISATION OF MICRO FOOD PROCESSING ENTERPRISES (PMFME) SCHEME WHAT IS PMFME? Centrally Sponsored Scheme under MoFPI. Launch year: 2020 (part of Atmanirbhar Bharat). Objective: Formalisation + Competitiveness + Modernisation of India’s unorganised micro food processing sector (~25 lakh units, 74% unregistered). Implementation model: One District One Product (ODOP) approach. Target beneficiaries: Individual micro-enterprises, FPOs, SHGs, Cooperatives. Relevance GS-III | Economy – MSMEs & Food Processing: Formalises unorganised micro units, strengthens value addition, ODOP clusters, supply chains, and rural non-farm growth. GS-III | Inclusive Growth: Empowers women-led SHGs, expands credit access, reduces rural vulnerability, supports micro-entrepreneurship. GS-II | Governance & Implementation: Demonstrates convergence (PMKSY, PLISFPI, NRLM), highlights gaps in capacity building, digital literacy, market linkages.   WHY IS THIS IN NEWS?   MoFPI reported the latest progress up to 31 October 2025 on PMFME scheme performance. Multiple PIB releases (food processing, renewable technologies, MSME support, PLISFPI linkages) highlight policy push for micro-enterprise formalisation + green technologies + rural employment. Parliamentary replies confirm high uptake, massive SHG participation, and integration with PMKSY + PLISFPI.   KEY PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS A. Loans & Subsidies 1,62,744 loans sanctioned under credit-linked subsidy. Total loan amount sanctioned: ₹13,234.90 crore. B. SHG Empowerment 3,65,935 SHG members approved for seed capital. C. Infrastructure Creation 101 Common Infrastructure Facilities (CIFs) sanctioned. 76 Incubation centres approved. D. Market Access 27 Branding & Marketing proposals approved. E. Central Share Released to States/UTs Steady fund release over last 5 years (exact annual figures not disclosed in PIB). SCHEME COMPONENTS Support to Individual / Group Micro Enterprises 35% credit-linked capital subsidy, max ₹10 lakh. Covers new units + upgradation. Support to SHGs ₹40,000 per SHG member as seed capital for tools and working capital. Max ₹4 lakh per SHG federation. Common Infrastructure Support 35% subsidy, cap ₹3 crore. For FPOs/SHGs/Cooperatives/Govt agencies. Facilities open for public use on hiring basis → reduces cost barriers. Branding & Marketing Support Up to 50% grant to FPOs/SHGs/Cooperatives/SPVs. Essential for ODOP value chain integration. Capacity Building Entrepreneurship Development Program (EDP+) Product-specific skilling Training of trainers, DRPs, incubation support. PROGRESS & PERFORMANCE NATIONWIDE Formalisation Momentum SHG seed capital uptake (3.66 lakh members) shows deep penetration in rural areas. High loan sanction numbers reflect strong credit linkage via banks/NBFCs. ODOP Integration improving clusters Establishment of CIFs + incubation centres strengthens local value chains. Reduces entry barriers for first-time entrepreneurs. Employment & Income Growth Micro food processing units generate off-farm rural employment → stabilises incomes, reduces distress migration. Women-led Enterprise Growth SHG-driven participation is a major success → aligns with Lakhpati Didi, NRLM, Aatmanirbhar Bharat goals. Convergence with PMKSY & PLISFPI PMFME upgrading micro-units, while PLISFPI scales large/medium units → integrated value chain development. CAPACITY BUILDING & ECOSYSTEM SUPPORT MoFPI Interventions National & State campaigns: newspapers, radio, expos, fairs, buyer-seller meets. Awareness drives targeting women collectives & SHGs. NIFTEM-K & NIFTEM-T Support Handholding, mentoring. Pilot plants, incubation services, NABL labs. Access to R&D, market linkages, packaging technology. Green Technology Push (related PIB note) Incentives for solar, biomass, wind energy → up to ₹35 lakh per project (PMKSY). Mandatory CTO (Water & Air) for grant release. Promotion of Non-ODS, low-GWP refrigerants for cold chain. Sustainable Packaging Innovation Biopolymers: PLA, starch, nanofibers. Low-waste packaging systems → crucial for export competitiveness. FINANCIAL SUPPORT STRUCTURE Component Support Target Group Capital Subsidy 35% (max ₹10 lakh) Individual/Group MFPEs SHG Seed Capital ₹40,000 per member (max 4 lakh per federation) SHGs Common Infrastructure 35% (max ₹3 crore) FPOs/SHGs/Coops/Govt agencies Branding & Marketing Up to 50% FPOs/SHGs/Coops/SPVs Capacity Building EDP+, Skilling, ToT, DRPs Entrepreneurs, SHGs, FPOs STRENGTHS OF PMFME Modernises the unorganised food processing sector (~74% unregistered units). Reduces credit constraints through capital subsidies. Empowers women SHGs → major socio-economic impact. ODOP creates specialisation, branding and export potential. Facilitates common facilities, reducing costs for small entrepreneurs. Strong convergence with NRLM, PMKSY, PLISFPI. CHALLENGES & GAPS Slow pace of on-ground utilisation of CIFs relative to sanction numbers. Need for stronger market linkages beyond local markets. Limited digital literacy among micro-entrepreneurs → affects compliance & formalisation. Fragmented value chains in certain ODOP regions. Credit access still depends heavily on bank willingness. THE HEALTH SECURITY SE NATIONAL SECURITY CESS BILL, 2025 WHAT IS THIS BILL? A new capacity-based excise cess introduced via a dedicated legislation. Purpose: Create a predictable, rule-based revenue stream for National Security, and Public Health expenditure. The cess is levied on machinery or processes used for manufacturing specified goods. Initially applies to pan masala, but Government may extend it to other notified goods. Relevance GS-III | Economy – Taxation & Fiscal Policy: Introduces rule-based, capacity-based excise system to ensure predictable revenue for national priorities. GS-II & GS-III | Public Health: Uses corrective taxation on harmful products; channels revenue to strengthen health security systems. GS-II | Governance: Establishes structured compliance, audit, enforcement, and multi-tier appeals—enhances transparency and accountability. WHY IS THIS IN NEWS? Government introduced a new statutory framework for a special excise cess to strengthen funding for two critical national priorities—health security and national security. Bill formalises a capacity-based taxation system for high-risk/ high-revenue products. Seeks to improve compliance, monitoring, enforcement and stable revenue mobilisation. OBJECTIVES OF THE BILL A. Fiscal Stability Create predictable and reliable revenues for national security & public health. B. Administrative Clarity Provide a structured, transparent, rule-based framework for levy, assessment, monitoring, enforcement, and appeal. C. Corrective Taxation Ensure certain products (starting with pan masala) contribute fairly to socio-economic needs. D. Plug Revenue Leakages Prevent evasion common in high-margin goods produced on semi-automatic/hybrid machines. WHAT GOODS ARE COVERED? Pan Masala (initial coverage). Government empowered to add any other goods to Schedule I. WHO IS LIABLE TO PAY THE CESS? Any person who owns / operates / controls machines or processes used for manufacturing the notified goods. Liability independent of income tax/GST status. NATURE OF LEVY Capacity-based monthly excise cess. Levied in addition to existing taxes/duties. Applied on: Machines installed, or Manual processes undertaken. BASIS OF CALCULATION A. Machine-Based Production Computed using: Maximum rated speed (pouches/tins/containers per minute). Weight per pack. Example rate: ₹101 lakh per month for machines up to 500 packs/min (up to 2.5 g pack weight). B. Manual Process ₹11 lakh per month flat cess. ABATEMENT RULE If operations remain shut for 15+ continuous days, prorated abatement applies. Ensures fairness and prevents liability during genuine downtime. FLOW OF FUNDS Cess proceeds credited to Consolidated Fund of India (CFI). To be used specifically for: National Security, Public Health Systems. REGISTRATION, RETURNS & COMPLIANCE ROADMAP Step 1: Registration Mandatory for any person possessing machines/processes for notified goods. Step 2: Self-Declaration of Machinery Maximum speed, weight per pouch, number of machines, type of process. Step 3: Verification Officers may verify/calibrate parameters. Opportunity of being heard before final determination. Step 4: Cess Computation Based on declared/verified capacity. Step 5: Monthly Payment Pay cess by 7th of each month (pre-payment model). Step 6: Monthly Return Filing Mandatory return with details of machines, operations, cess paid. Step 7: Audit & Scrutiny Audit of returns, records, declarations. ENFORCEMENT ARCHITECTURE A. Monitoring Tools Scrutiny of returns Inspection Search Seizure Real-time monitoring of machinery/process B. Offences Non-declaration of machines Undeclared operations Falsification of records Evasion or short payment Obstruction of officers Fraudulent refund claims C. Penalties Monetary fines Confiscation of goods/machinery Graded imprisonment depending on severity Arrest for serious contraventions D. Inter-Agency Coordination Collaboration with police, customs, railways, revenue departments. APPEALS MECHANISM Multi-tier appeal structure: Appellate Authority Appellate Tribunal High Court Supreme Court Ensures due process, fairness, and judicial review. GOVERNMENT POWERS UNDER THE BILL Increase cess up to 2× in public interest. Exempt specific persons/units under prescribed conditions. Notify additional goods for inclusion under the cess system. Set rules and procedures for all aspects of levy & administration. POLICY SIGNIFICANCE A. Strengthening Health Security & National Security Financing Dedicated revenue channel ensures non-disruptive funding for critical sectors. B. Capacity-Based Taxation = Anti-Evasion Tool Pan masala, gutkha, tobacco products often evade tax via under-reporting. Machine-capacity levy bypasses quantity reporting manipulation. C. Rule-Based, Transparent Framework Reduces discretionary power and increases administrative predictability. D. Aligns with Public Health Priorities Sin-goods/product categories that impose public health costs help fund health systems. E. Fiscal Federalism Neutrality Cess → goes to CFI, not divisible pool → strengthens Union fiscal space. CHALLENGES & RISKS Industry may shift to undeclared/illegal production to avoid cess. Monitoring capacity at ground level (especially for semi-automatic units) is crucial. Risk of litigation due to capacity assessment disputes. Potential for regressive impact if extended to essential goods (unlikely but permitted by law).

Daily Editorials Analysis

Editorials/Opinions Analysis For UPSC 06 December 2025

Content Digital Constitutionalism Chile’s lesson for India’s coal conundrum Digital Constitutionalism WHAT WAS THE ORDER? Govt announced (2025) that all mobile manufacturers must pre-install Sanchar Saathi on phones sold from 2026 onwards. App’s functions include CEIR, stolen-phone tracking, SIM misuse detection, user safety, and police assistance. The rule required mandatory installation at manufacturing level, not optional download by users. Relevance GS-II | Polity: Fundamental Rights, privacy, state surveillance, constitutional governance. GS-II | Governance: Algorithmic decision-making, administrative fairness, accountability, opaque technologies. GS-III | Cyber Security: Rising digital crimes, digital policing, metadata risks. GS-III | Economy & Technology: Regulatory tensions between state control and global tech industry. Practice Questions The Sanchar Saathi rollback highlights the tension between citizen privacy and state surveillance. Discuss how this episode strengthens the case for Digital Constitutionalism in India. (10 marks)   WHY IS THIS IN NEWS? (The 48-hour rollback) In 48 hours, the government revoked the mandatory installation order after: Opposition from foreign smartphone companies, especially Apple, which refused compliance. Concerns raised by civil society, privacy researchers, and industry bodies. Fears of ambiguous data collection, lack of user consent, unlimited storage, and surveillance risks. Reuters broke the story → triggered global scrutiny. Government clarified that the intention was consumer safety, citing rising cybercrimes (15.9 lakh → 20.4 lakh between 2023–2024), but concerns of digital overreach took precedence. WHAT THIS CONTROVERSY SIGNALS ? Escalating tension between state surveillance authority and digital privacy rights. Increasing dependence of government on platforms, metadata, AI tools → blurred lines between governance and surveillance. Exposes weaknesses in India’s evolving data protection, algorithmic accountability, and digital rights frameworks. DEEPER ISSUE: THE EMERGENCE OF DIGITAL CONSTITUTIONALISM Meaning Application of constitutional values—liberty, privacy, dignity, equality, non-arbitrariness, natural justice—to the digital domain. Why needed Governance increasingly relies on invisible systems: biometrics predictive algorithms behavioural modelling facial recognition metadata analysis Without constitutional safeguards, these technologies expand state and private power beyond citizen control. KEY ARGUMENTS FROM THE ARTICLE A. Threats from Algorithmic Governance Automated decisions regulate: KYC welfare delivery job eligibility credit scoring moderation of speech These systems operate as “black boxes” → no explanation, no appeal, high risk of unfair exclusion. B. Rise of Invisible Surveillance Surveillance today is not Orwellian in a visible sense; it is ambient and silent: location tracing metadata facial recognition device identifiers Creates self-censorship and a chilling effect on dissent. C. Inadequacy of existing legal protections Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (2017) recognised privacy as fundamental right. DPDP Act 2023 offers protections but has: broad government exemptions weak oversight limited remedies prioritisation of state interests over liberty D. Global examples of caution Facial recognition restrictions across U.S. cities due to discrimination & misidentification. DigiYatra storing biometric data with private entities → ownership ambiguities. E. Structural democratic dangers Concentration of digital power with: governments law enforcement tech platforms Citizens reduced to data subjects, not constitutional right-holders. WHAT DIGITAL CONSTITUTIONALISM SHOULD INCLUDE ? Independent Digital Rights Commission. Strict necessity and proportionality for surveillance. Mandatory judicial warrants for sensitive data access. Public transparency reports. Regular bias/audit tests for high-risk AI. Right to explanation in algorithmic decisions. Right to appeal automated decisions. Strong purpose limitation and harsh penalties for misuse. Digital literacy as a constitutional right-enabler. BROADER IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIA A. India’s digital state is expanding rapidly Aadhaar DigiLocker FASTag DigiYatra AI-powered policing Predictive governance → All operate with limited constitutional guardrails. B. Economic considerations constrain regulatory choices Apple, global tech companies have leverage → government cannot risk “manufacturing exit”. C. India lacks a comprehensive surveillance law Surveillance currently governed by colonial-era or patchwork IT rules. No statute requiring judicial authorization for digital surveillance. CONCLUSION The Sanchar Saathi rollback underscores an emerging constitutional challenge: state-led digital expansion without adequate rights-based safeguards. As governance becomes increasingly algorithmic, surveillance-driven, and data-centric, India must embed constitutional protections—privacy, transparency, due process, proportionality—into its digital architecture. Digital constitutionalism is not merely a theoretical construct but a democratic necessity to ensure that technology serves citizens and not the other way around. Chile’s lesson for India’s coal conundrum WHAT IS THE ISSUE? India has achieved dramatic renewable energy gains, doubling clean energy capacity during 2021–25. Yet, India remains heavily dependent on coal, especially for electricity generation (≈75% in 2024). Coal provides jobs + cheap power in several States, but also results in air pollution, health loss, climate risk, and global warming. Relevance GS-III | Environment & Climate Change Coal phaseout, decarbonisation pathways, CCPI rankings, global comparisons (Chile). Air pollution, climate vulnerability, energy transition strategies. GS-III | Economy – Infrastructure & Energy Power sector reforms, energy security, renewable integration, market design, carbon pricing. GS-I & GS-II | Social Justice & Governance Just Transition for coal-dependent regions. Worker protection, reskilling, community rehabilitation. GS-II | International Relations Climate leadership, global expectations from India, COP negotiations. Practice Question India’s fall in the CCPI ranking despite renewable gains exposes contradictions in its energy transition pathway. Examine the factors behind this decline. (10 marks) WHY IS THIS IN NEWS? (COP30, Brazil, Nov 2025) India fell 13 places to 23rd in the Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI) 2025. Reason: Lack of progress in coal phaseout, despite strong renewable expansion. Highlights the coal conundrum: socio-economic dependence vs. ecological and public health costs. Chile’s successful coal transition is highlighted as a comparative model relevant to India. INDIA’S ENERGY STATUS (2024–25) Coal Dependence Coal accounts for over half of India’s total energy use. 75% of electricity was coal-generated in 2024. Domestic coal production is increasing, not declining. Renewables Renewables (wind, solar, hydro, nuclear) = ~50% of installed capacity, but only 20% of actual generation. Growth strong but inadequate to replace coal in dispatch. CHILE’S EXPERIENCE: WHAT DID IT DO DIFFERENTLY? Key Actions (2014–24) Carbon tax: USD 5 per tonne of CO₂ in 2014. Strict emission norms: raised coal plant compliance costs by 30%. Competitive solar/wind auctions lowered renewable tariffs. Large-scale energy storage rollout for grid stability. Commitment to phase out all coal by 2040. Outcomes Coal generation dropped from 43.6% → 17.5% (2016–24). Renewables > 60% of energy mix. Worker transition aided by: diversified economy strong renewable industry supportive political environment WHY INDIA’S TRANSITION IS MORE COMPLEX ? Coal’s share far higher than Chile → more plants to retire. Millions depend on coal economy in Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Odisha, West Bengal → risk of social disruption. Fewer alternative industries in coal districts. Grid integration challenges → renewables intermittent; storage insufficient. Political economy resistance due to tariffs, subsidies, and state-owned coal interests. WHY COAL PHASEOUT IS A “NO REGRETS” POLICY ? A. Economic Loss Climate change could cause 3–10% GDP loss by 2100 due to heat stress & productivity decline. B. Health Impact A 1 GW increase in coal capacity → 14% rise in infant mortality in nearby districts. Also contributes to PM2.5, respiratory diseases, and chronic illness. C. Climate Leadership Without a coal exit plan, India’s renewable achievements lack credibility in global negotiations. Three Key Thrust Areas 1. Physical Transition Remove oldest & most polluting units on priority. Cancel new coal approvals. Replace coal output with firm renewable power + storage. Scale up electrification of transport, industry, households. 2. Market & Regulatory Reform Introduce carbon pricing. Remove coal subsidies & cross-subsidies. Implement clean dispatch rules (renewables-first). Reform procurement contracts to incentivise RE+storage. 3. Social Protection & Just Transition Reskilling, alternative livelihoods, and robust worker support. Set up a dedicated transition fund – e.g., Green Energy Transition India Fund. Use District Mineral Foundation (DMF) for industry diversification in coal regions. FINANCE FOR COAL PHASEOUT Needs blended finance: Public funds → social welfare, worker protection. Private capital → renewable infrastructure, battery storage, green hydrogen. International climate finance flows crucial. DMF + CSR + sovereign green bonds can support district-level transition. CONCLUSION India’s fall in the CCPI rankings highlights a structural contradiction: rapid renewable expansion without a parallel coal exit strategy. The Chile experience demonstrates that coal-dependent economies can transition if supported by decisive policy, market reform, carbon pricing, and worker protection. For India, the challenge is larger but the imperative is unavoidable — climate losses, health impacts, and economic risks make coal phaseout a no-regrets pathway. A credible transition roadmap, with timelines, financing mechanisms, regulatory reforms, and Just Transition policies, is essential to align India’s growth trajectory with its net-zero ambitions and global climate responsibility.

Facebook Instagram YouTube LinkedIn TelegramGroup Website TelegramChat
Terms and Conditions Privacy Refund Policy Learning Management System by Testpress